SEIC
Price
$88.19
Change
-$0.62 (-0.70%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
10.9B
67 days until earnings call
VINP
Price
$10.16
Change
-$0.17 (-1.65%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
642.57M
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SEIC vs VINP

Header iconSEIC vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts SEIC vs VINPBanner chart's image
SEI Investments
Price$88.19
Change-$0.62 (-0.70%)
Volume$750.97K
Capitalization10.9B
Vinci Compass Investments
Price$10.16
Change-$0.17 (-1.65%)
Volume$28.6K
Capitalization642.57M
SEIC vs VINP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SEIC vs. VINP commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEIC is a Hold and VINP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (SEIC: $88.19 vs. VINP: $10.16)
Brand notoriety: SEIC and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SEIC: 88% vs. VINP: 56%
Market capitalization -- SEIC: $10.9B vs. VINP: $642.57M
SEIC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $10.9B. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $642.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SEIC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SEIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the long-term than VINP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SEIC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SEIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the short-term than VINP.

Price Growth

SEIC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.79% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

VINP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.96% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEIC($10.9B) has a higher market cap than VINP($643M). VINP has higher P/E ratio than SEIC: VINP (20.60) vs SEIC (16.58). SEIC YTD gains are higher at: 7.538 vs. VINP (4.093). SEIC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 957M vs. VINP (244M). VINP has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. SEIC (778M). SEIC has less debt than VINP: SEIC (29M) vs VINP (942M). SEIC has higher revenues than VINP: SEIC (2.21B) vs VINP (791M).
SEICVINPSEIC / VINP
Capitalization10.9B643M1,695%
EBITDA957M244M392%
Gain YTD7.5384.093184%
P/E Ratio16.5820.6080%
Revenue2.21B791M279%
Total Cash778M1.65B47%
Total Debt29M942M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SEICVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APAYX11.250.02
+0.18%
Integrity Dividend Summit A
FTAEX14.00N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Total Intl Equity A
LAFTX20.41N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Affiliated R5
TRGVX19.60N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Glbl Val Eq
MUEVX40.10-0.14
-0.35%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity R6

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with PAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then PAX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
-1.65%
PAX - VINP
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
BN - VINP
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
SEIC - VINP
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
BAM - VINP
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
TROW - VINP
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
More