SFBS
Price
$84.92
Change
-$0.43 (-0.50%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.64B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBSI
Price
$46.26
Change
+$0.11 (+0.24%)
Updated
Jul 14, 11:11 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.36B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFBS vs UBSI

SFBS vs UBSI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFBS vs. UBSI commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFBS is a StrongBuy and UBSI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (SFBS: $84.92 vs. UBSI: $46.15)
Brand notoriety: SFBS and UBSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFBS: 59% vs. UBSI: 56%
Market capitalization -- SFBS: $4.64B vs. UBSI: $6.36B
SFBS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.64B. UBSI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UBSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBSI is a better buy in the long-term than SFBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBSI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UBSI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the short-term than UBSI.

Price Growth

SFBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.28% price change this week, while UBSI (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 20, 2026.

UBSI is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBSI($6.36B) has a higher market cap than SFBS($4.64B). SFBS has higher P/E ratio than UBSI: SFBS (15.67) vs UBSI (12.93). UBSI YTD gains are higher at: 22.391 vs. SFBS (20.069). UBSI has more cash in the bank: 269M vs. SFBS (101M). SFBS has less debt than UBSI: SFBS (34.8M) vs UBSI (626M). UBSI has higher revenues than SFBS: UBSI (1.26B) vs SFBS (583M).
SFBSUBSISFBS / UBSI
Capitalization4.64B6.36B73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.06922.39190%
P/E Ratio15.6712.93121%
Revenue583M1.26B46%
Total Cash101M269M38%
Total Debt34.8M626M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFBS vs UBSI: Fundamental Ratings
SFBS
UBSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8644
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7445
SMR RATING
1..100
3224
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7059
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBSI's Valuation (39) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (88). This means that UBSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (74). This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's SMR Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (32). This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (47). This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (70). This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFBSUBSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNGE31.570.07
+0.21%
First Trust S-Network Strmng & Gmng ETF
RBLY13.76-0.06
-0.47%
Yieldmax Rblx Option Income Strategy ETF
AIEQ49.90-0.29
-0.59%
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF
ESGV132.52-1.27
-0.95%
Vanguard ESG US Stock ETF
WTAI41.59-2.20
-5.02%
WisdomTree Artfcl Intllgnc & Innvtn ETF

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
-0.50%
SFNC - SFBS
83%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
UBSI - SFBS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
TRMK - SFBS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
UCB - SFBS
80%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
CATY - SFBS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
More