SG
Price
$6.45
Change
-$0.10 (-1.53%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
766.44M
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WEN
Price
$7.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.4B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SG vs WEN

SG vs WEN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SG vs. WEN commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SG is a Hold and WEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (SG: $6.45 vs. WEN: $7.36)
Brand notoriety: SG and WEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SG: 57% vs. WEN: 22%
Market capitalization -- SG: $766.44M vs. WEN: $1.4B
SG [@Restaurants] is valued at $766.44M. WEN’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $192.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWEN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WEN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WEN is a better buy in the long-term than SG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WEN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the short-term than WEN.

Price Growth

SG (@Restaurants) experienced а +7.50% price change this week, while WEN (@Restaurants) price change was +5.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +4.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

SG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

WEN is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+4.07% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WEN($1.4B) has a higher market cap than SG($766M). SG has higher P/E ratio than WEN: SG (53.75) vs WEN (9.56). SG YTD gains are higher at: -4.586 vs. WEN (-8.333). WEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 511M vs. SG (92.6M). WEN has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. SG (157M). SG has less debt than WEN: SG (356M) vs WEN (4.12B). WEN has higher revenues than SG: WEN (2.19B) vs SG (675M).
SGWENSG / WEN
Capitalization766M1.4B55%
EBITDA92.6M511M18%
Gain YTD-4.586-8.33355%
P/E Ratio53.759.56562%
Revenue675M2.19B31%
Total Cash157M299M53%
Total Debt356M4.12B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SG vs WEN: Fundamental Ratings
SG
WEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8811
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6061
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WEN's Valuation (5) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SG (97) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WEN’s stock grew significantly faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

WEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WEN’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

WEN's SMR Rating (11) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SG (88) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WEN’s stock grew significantly faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

WEN's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (65) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WEN’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SG's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as WEN (61) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to WEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGWEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WPCSX42.650.77
+1.84%
AB Concentrated Growth C
FBALX34.910.17
+0.49%
Fidelity Balanced
RGESX12.370.05
+0.41%
Russell Inv Global Equity S
SMVFX12.470.03
+0.24%
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity C
TCBIX9.58-0.01
-0.10%
Covered Bridge I

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
-1.53%
CMG - SG
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.37%
CAVA - SG
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
FRSH - SG
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
BROS - SG
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
BJRI - SG
41%
Loosely correlated
-8.96%
More

WEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEN has been loosely correlated with JACK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WEN jumps, then JACK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WEN
1D Price
Change %
WEN100%
N/A
JACK - WEN
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
FRSH - WEN
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
DIN - WEN
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
DAVE - WEN
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
SG - WEN
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
More