CMG
Price
$37.22
Change
-$1.30 (-3.37%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
47.19B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SG
Price
$6.45
Change
-$0.10 (-1.53%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
766.44M
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMG vs SG

CMG vs SG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) vs. Sweetgreen (SG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) operates as a scaled, profitable fast-casual restaurant chain with annual revenue exceeding $11 billion, while Sweetgreen (SG) remains a smaller growth-stage salad concept with revenue near $680 million and ongoing net losses.
  • Recent market activity shows CMG shares trading near $32 amid preparation for second-quarter results, reflecting broader sector pressures and a year-to-date decline of approximately 14%.
  • SG shares have exhibited higher volatility, recently hovering near $6 following swings tied to produce-related concerns and operational updates, with elevated short interest above 20%.
  • CMG benefits from established brand strength, consistent profitability, and lower beta around 0.93, contrasting with SG's higher beta of 2.17 and focus on menu innovation and automation.
  • Both companies face consumer spending sensitivity in the fast-casual sector, though CMG's balance sheet supports share repurchases while SG has pursued liquidity measures.
  • Relative positioning favors CMG for stability-oriented strategies, while SG offers higher-risk exposure to potential turnaround catalysts.

Introduction

This comparison examines Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) and Sweetgreen (SG), two publicly traded companies in the fast-casual restaurant sector. The analysis highlights differences in scale, financial profiles, and recent market behavior to assist investors and traders evaluating relative performance and positioning. Portfolio managers seeking established cash-flow generators and growth-oriented traders monitoring turnaround potential may find the side-by-side review relevant for assessing sector exposure and risk-adjusted opportunities in the current environment.

CMG Overview and Recent Performance

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) operates a large network of fast-casual restaurants specializing in customizable Mexican-inspired meals. The company maintains a market capitalization in the range of $44 billion and generates consistent operating cash flow supported by its scale. In recent weeks, shares have traded near $32, reflecting a year-to-date decline of about 14% amid broader market conditions and sector headwinds. Key influences on sentiment include anticipation of second-quarter 2026 earnings scheduled for July 29, alongside news of international expansion into markets such as Mexico. Performance has shown modest resilience on select positive developments, though overall momentum remains tempered by input cost pressures and consumer spending patterns.

SG Overview and Recent Performance

Sweetgreen (SG) operates a chain of fast-casual salad restaurants emphasizing fresh, plant-forward menu items and technology-driven operations. The company holds a market capitalization near $800 million and continues to focus on scaling while reporting net losses. Recent market activity has featured notable volatility, with shares trading around $6 following swings associated with produce supply concerns and menu innovations such as limited-time offerings. Year-to-date performance includes periods of gains offset by pullbacks, with same-store sales trends from the first quarter showing declines. Sentiment has been shaped by operational updates and broader industry challenges, resulting in elevated trading volume on both positive and negative news.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section. Available bots encompass a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many targeting specific equity sets and exhibiting varied win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles typically spanning double-digit annualized figures in optimized configurations. Users can review detailed metrics to identify bots suited to individual objectives. Explore the curated selection at Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) and Sweetgreen (SG) differ markedly in business model and scale. CMG benefits from a mature, profitable platform with diversified geographic reach and strong brand recognition, supporting disciplined capital returns such as buybacks. SG emphasizes technology integration, menu experimentation, and a smaller footprint, positioning it for potential higher growth but exposing it to execution risks during the path to profitability. Recent momentum shows CMG maintaining relatively steadier trading ranges compared with SG’s sharper swings. Risk factors for CMG center on margin compression from costs, while SG contends with higher volatility and short interest. Sector exposure overlaps in consumer discretionary dining, yet CMG’s lower beta offers more defensive characteristics versus SG’s amplified sensitivity to market moves. Market sentiment reflects greater stability around the larger operator amid ongoing economic uncertainty.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, financial stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probabilistic favorability to Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) over Sweetgreen (SG). The assessment emphasizes CMG’s established profitability, lower volatility profile, and stronger balance sheet as providing a more consistent foundation for trend-following approaches. While SG presents legitimate catalysts through operational initiatives, its negative earnings trajectory and elevated risk metrics introduce greater uncertainty that algorithmic models typically weigh more conservatively. This relative preference remains dynamic and subject to shifts in earnings momentum or technical signals.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CMG vs. SG commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a StrongBuy and SG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CMG: $37.22 vs. SG: $6.45)
Brand notoriety: CMG: Notable vs. SG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 71% vs. SG: 57%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $47.19B vs. SG: $766.44M
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $47.19B. SG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $766.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $192.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the long-term than SG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the short-term than SG.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а +17.08% price change this week, while SG (@Restaurants) price change was +7.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +4.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

SG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+4.07% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($47.2B) has a higher market cap than SG($766M). SG has higher P/E ratio than CMG: SG (53.75) vs CMG (34.46). CMG YTD gains are higher at: 0.595 vs. SG (-4.586). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.3B vs. SG (92.6M). CMG has more cash in the bank: 672M vs. SG (157M). SG has less debt than CMG: SG (356M) vs CMG (5.42B). CMG has higher revenues than SG: CMG (12.4B) vs SG (675M).
CMGSGCMG / SG
Capitalization47.2B766M6,162%
EBITDA2.3B92.6M2,481%
Gain YTD0.595-4.586-13%
P/E Ratio34.4653.7564%
Revenue12.4B675M1,837%
Total Cash672M157M428%
Total Debt5.42B356M1,522%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs SG: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
SG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8662
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
2088
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4965
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6260
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMG's Valuation (83) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (97) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SG (88) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew significantly faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (65) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SG's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as CMG (62) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WPCSX42.650.77
+1.84%
AB Concentrated Growth C
FBALX34.910.17
+0.49%
Fidelity Balanced
RGESX12.370.05
+0.41%
Russell Inv Global Equity S
SMVFX12.470.03
+0.24%
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity C
TCBIX9.58-0.01
-0.10%
Covered Bridge I

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
-3.37%
FRSH - CMG
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
SG - CMG
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
CAVA - CMG
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
BJRI - CMG
44%
Loosely correlated
-8.96%
CAKE - CMG
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
-1.53%
CMG - SG
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.37%
CAVA - SG
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
FRSH - SG
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
BROS - SG
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
BJRI - SG
41%
Loosely correlated
-8.96%
More