SII
Price
$116.89
Change
-$0.71 (-0.60%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.02B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WT
Price
$22.82
Change
+$0.12 (+0.53%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.44B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SII vs WT

SII vs WT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SII vs. WT commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SII is a Hold and WT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (SII: $117.60 vs. WT: $22.70)
Brand notoriety: SII: Not notable vs. WT: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SII: 57% vs. WT: 43%
Market capitalization -- SII: $3.02B vs. WT: $3.44B
SII [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.02B. WT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $183.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $10.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SII’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SII’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the long-term than SII.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SII’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SII’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the short-term than SII.

Price Growth

SII (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.71% price change this week, while WT (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

SII is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

WT is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.41% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WT($3.44B) has a higher market cap than SII($3.02B). WT has higher P/E ratio than SII: WT (41.27) vs SII (28.82). WT YTD gains are higher at: 87.118 vs. SII (20.769). WT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 179M vs. SII (120M). SII has more cash in the bank: 175M vs. WT (106M). SII has less debt than WT: SII (18.7M) vs WT (1.2B). WT has higher revenues than SII: WT (610M) vs SII (369M).
SIIWTSII / WT
Capitalization3.02B3.44B88%
EBITDA120M179M67%
Gain YTD20.76987.11824%
P/E Ratio28.8241.2770%
Revenue369M610M60%
Total Cash175M106M165%
Total Debt18.7M1.2B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SII vs WT: Fundamental Ratings
SII
WT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2885
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
385
SMR RATING
1..100
4150
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6426
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SII's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as WT (87) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to WT’s over the last 12 months.

WT's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SII (38) in the null industry. This means that WT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as WT (50) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to WT’s over the last 12 months.

WT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SII (45) in the null industry. This means that WT’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

WT's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SII (64) in the null industry. This means that WT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SII’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SIIWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OKTG35.253.28
+10.25%
Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF
HOMZ47.010.65
+1.40%
The Hoya Capital Housing ETF
IBD23.680.03
+0.15%
Inspire Corporate Bond ETF
YBTC17.40-0.01
-0.06%
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Cll Strat ETF
XSMO88.75-0.61
-0.68%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF

SII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SII has been loosely correlated with VINP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SII jumps, then VINP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SII
1D Price
Change %
SII100%
-0.12%
VINP - SII
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
WT - SII
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
IVZ - SII
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
BLK - SII
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
HASI - SII
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More

WT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WT has been loosely correlated with VRTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WT jumps, then VRTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WT
1D Price
Change %
WT100%
-0.13%
VRTS - WT
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
BEN - WT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
IVZ - WT
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.60%
APAM - WT
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
BBUC - WT
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
More