Advertisement
SLGN vs SON
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLGN is a Hold and SON is a StrongBuy.
| SLGN | SON | SLGN / SON | |
| Capitalization | 4.08B | 4.73B | 86% |
| EBITDA | 909M | 1.54B | 59% |
| Gain YTD | -2.800 | 12.870 | -22% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.15 | 7.39 | 205% |
| Revenue | 6.68B | 7.46B | 90% |
| Total Cash | 352M | 169M | 208% |
| Total Debt | 4.83B | 4.71B | 103% |
SLGN | SON | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SON's Valuation (10) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SLGN (28). This means that SON’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
SLGN's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SON (100). This means that SLGN’s stock grew similarly to SON’s over the last 12 months.
SON's SMR Rating (49) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SLGN (65). This means that SON’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
SON's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SLGN (69). This means that SON’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
SLGN's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SON (99). This means that SLGN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SON’s over the last 12 months.
| SLGN | SON | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 23 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SLGN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SON’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SLGN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SON’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SLGN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SON’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SLGN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SLGN (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -6.19% price change this week, while SON (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -7.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
SLGN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
SON is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Containers/Packaging (-4.47% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INDL | 43.09 | 0.84 | +1.99% |
| Direxion Daily MSCI India Bull 2x ETF | |||
| FYLD | 41.03 | 0.30 | +0.74% |
| Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
| PSLV | 20.95 | 0.06 | +0.29% |
| Sprott Physical Silver Trust | |||
| MUNA | 99.69 | N/A | N/A |
| Northern Trust 2030 Tx-Exm Dis Lddr ETF | |||
| IG | 19.92 | -0.02 | -0.10% |
| Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF | |||
SLGN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLGN has been loosely correlated with CCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLGN jumps, then CCK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLGN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLGN | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| CCK - SLGN | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| SW - SLGN | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| BALL - SLGN | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| AMCR - SLGN | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| OI - SLGN | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
More | ||||
SON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SON has been loosely correlated with GEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SON jumps, then GEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SON | 100% | -1.22% | ||
| GEF - SON | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| AMCR - SON | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| CCK - SON | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| SLGN - SON | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| SW - SON | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.39% | ||
More | ||||