Advertisement
CCK vs SLGN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Silgan Holdings (SLGN) Stock Comparison
1) Key Takeaways
- CCK (Crown Holdings) and SLGN (Silgan Holdings) are both major rigid-packaging suppliers, but they skew toward different end markets: beverage cans versus food, closures, and dispensing products.
- CCK has delivered stronger recent momentum, with double-digit sales growth and a full-year earnings outlook near the top of its raised guidance range.
- SLGN's recent story has been driven by a transformational $3.4 billion acquisition of Trivium Packaging, which lifted shares but also adds integration risk and a longer timeline to completion (mid-2027).
- Both companies are navigating raw-material cost inflation, but CCK has been more successful at offsetting it with volume growth.
- Relative performance and market positioning differ meaningfully: CCK trades near multi-year highs, while SLGN has lagged and trades well below its 52-week high.
2) Introduction
Investors comparing CCK and SLGN are effectively comparing two different corners of the global packaging industry. Crown Holdings is the world's leading supplier of aluminum beverage cans, while Silgan Holdings is a diversified producer of metal containers, closures, and dispensing systems for food, beverage, and personal-care markets. Both are defensive, consumer-linked industrial businesses, yet their growth drivers, recent catalysts, and relative performance have diverged in recent months. This stock comparison is most relevant for investors weighing cyclical exposure, acquisition-driven growth versus organic volume growth, and how each company manages cost inflation in the current market environment.
3) CCK Overview and Recent Performance
CCK (Crown Holdings) is a global leader in rigid packaging, best known for its aluminum beverage cans serving consumer marketing companies worldwide, alongside transit and protective packaging operations. In recent weeks, the company reported strong third-quarter results, with net sales rising roughly 16% year over year to $3.71 billion, supported by a 6% increase in global beverage can volumes. Adjusted earnings per share came in ahead of consensus estimates.
Despite the top- and bottom-line beats, shares slipped on the company's fourth-quarter guidance, which landed below analyst expectations, reflecting continued raw-material cost inflation and a moderation in volume growth. Over the trailing twelve months, however, CCK has meaningfully outperformed, gaining more than 20%, as robust North American and European beverage demand and aggressive share repurchases supported sentiment. The company raised its full-year adjusted earnings outlook earlier in the year and maintained a net leverage ratio near 2.5 times adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization).
4) SLGN Overview and Recent Performance
SLGN (Silgan Holdings) is a diversified rigid-packaging manufacturer serving food, beverage, personal care, healthcare, and home products markets. Its businesses span metal containers, dispensing and specialty closures, and custom plastic containers. Recent market activity has been dominated by a single catalyst: the announcement of an agreement to acquire Trivium Packaging for approximately $3.4 billion, in partnership with private-equity firm American Industrial Partners (AIP).
Under the deal, SLGN will combine its metal container and flat-cap closures businesses with Trivium into a new entity, retaining a 60% controlling stake while receiving roughly $2.3 billion in cash proceeds to reduce debt. Shares rallied sharply on the news, though the transaction is not expected to close until mid-2027 and remains subject to regulatory approvals. In contrast to CCK, SLGN has lagged the broader market over the past year, and its fundamentals have faced pressure from softer volumes in certain categories and higher input costs, even as management reaffirmed full-year guidance.
5) Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a systematic, data-driven edge in comparing names like CCK and SLGN, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of its most relevant automated strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and target ticker sets. Because not every bot suits every market regime, only the strongest and most appropriate performers for current conditions are featured in the Trending AI Robots section. The bots vary widely across win rates, trade frequency, and drawdown profiles, allowing users to filter by the characteristics that match their own risk tolerance. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help investors move from static comparison to an actively managed, algorithm-driven perspective.
6) Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between CCK and SLGN lies in their growth models. Crown Holdings leans heavily on organic beverage-can volumes, a business enjoying structural tailwinds as aluminum cans gain share in sustainability-conscious markets. Silgan, by comparison, is pursuing growth through a major merger-and-acquisition (M&A) transaction, which promises long-term earnings accretion but introduces near-term execution and integration risk.
From a momentum standpoint, CCK has been the stronger performer, supported by rising volumes and shareholder returns. SLGN has faced a softer fundamental backdrop, with mixed volumes and margin pressure across segments, though the Trivium deal has reinvigorated sentiment. Sector exposure also differs: CCK is heavily tied to beverage consumption cycles, while SLGN's food, fragrance, and dispensing businesses are more defensive but have shown uneven demand. On risk, both companies are sensitive to aluminum, steel, and resin costs, but CCK's superior volume growth has given it more room to absorb inflation.
7) Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative positioning, and the quality of recent catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely favor CCK in the current environment. Crown Holdings demonstrates more consistent positive momentum, stronger organic volume growth, and a clearer path to near-term earnings visibility. While SLGN's Trivium acquisition is strategically compelling, its benefits are not expected to materialize fully until 2027 and beyond, adding uncertainty that momentum-oriented models tend to discount. That said, this assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive: a shift in raw-material costs, integration execution, or demand trends could quickly alter the relative outlook for either name.
8) Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCK is a Hold and SLGN is a StrongBuy.
Momentum Indicator for CCK turns positive, indicating new upward trend
CCK saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 84 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 54 of the 84 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 64%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CCK just turned positive on October 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where CCK's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 53 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
CCK moved above its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for CCK crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 6 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 46%.
Following a +4.46% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CCK advanced for three days, in 186 of 315 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CCK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.
CCK broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CCK entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 14 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CCK’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 74 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.409) is normal, around the industry mean (1.311). P/E Ratio (16.627) is within average values for comparable stocks, (16.417). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.637) is also within normal values, averaging (1.023). Dividend Yield (0.012) settles around the average of (0.033) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.956) is also within normal values, averaging (1.259).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CCK’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock better than average.
SLGN's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SLGN turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where SLGN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 30 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on SLGN as a result. In 51 of 91 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
SLGN moved above its 50-day moving average on October 19, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +6.91% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SLGN advanced for three days, in 159 of 330 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 48%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for SLGN moved out of overbought territory on October 21, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 38 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 19 of the 38 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 50%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 7 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 50-day moving average for SLGN moved below the 200-day moving average on September 24, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SLGN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
SLGN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for SLGN entered a downward trend on October 14, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. SLGN’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 63 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.730) is normal, around the industry mean (1.267). P/E Ratio (15.278) is within average values for comparable stocks, (16.383). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.789) is also within normal values, averaging (1.023). Dividend Yield (0.022) settles around the average of (0.033) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.612) is also within normal values, averaging (1.259).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 90 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. SLGN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 84, placing this stock worse than average.
CCK | SLGN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SLGN's Valuation (63) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as CCK (74). This means that SLGN’s stock grew similarly to CCK’s over the last 12 months.
CCK's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SLGN (90). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
CCK's SMR Rating (35) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SLGN (65). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
CCK's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SLGN (54). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
CCK's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SLGN (38). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
| CCK | SLGN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 2 days ago 43% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SLGN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SLGN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLGN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SLGN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CCK (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а +4.61% price change this week, while SLGN (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +8.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCK is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2027.
SLGN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Containers/Packaging (+2.42% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
Advertisement
CCK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCK has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCK jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCK | 100% | +2.62% | ||
| AMCR - CCK | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| GEF - CCK | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| AMBP - CCK | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.05% | ||
| SON - CCK | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| SW - CCK | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
More | ||||
SLGN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLGN has been loosely correlated with BALL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLGN jumps, then BALL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLGN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLGN | 100% | -2.36% | ||
| BALL - SLGN | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| AMCR - SLGN | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| SW - SLGN | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| OI - SLGN | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| AVY - SLGN | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FTHF | 46.56 | 0.45 | +0.98% |
| First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) | |||
| RJMI | 24.35 | 0.05 | +0.22% |
| RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF (RJMI) | |||
| EQWL | 132.13 | 0.29 | +0.22% |
| Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) | |||
| IBHH | 23.15 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) | |||
| FLDZ | 26.03 | N/A | N/A |
| TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF (FLDZ) | |||