Advertisement
CCK vs SLGN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Silgan Holdings (SLGN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Crown Holdings (CCK) and Silgan Holdings (SLGN) operate in the metal packaging sector, with CCK emphasizing beverage cans and SLGN focusing on a broader mix including food containers and closures.
- Over recent weeks, both stocks have shown resilience amid broader market volatility, with SLGN posting a year-to-date return of approximately 14.11% compared to the S&P 500's 10.62%.
- CCK has demonstrated stronger longer-term outperformance in certain multi-year periods relative to SLGN, though recent 1-year returns for SLGN stand around 13.97%.
- Sector exposure to consumer staples and industrial demand provides both companies with defensive characteristics, tempered by raw material cost fluctuations.
- Upcoming earnings, including SLGN's second-quarter results scheduled for late July, represent near-term catalysts that could influence relative momentum.
- Market sentiment remains measured for both, with emphasis on operational efficiency and pricing power in a competitive packaging landscape.
Introduction
Investors and traders evaluating packaging industry exposure often compare Crown Holdings (CCK) and Silgan Holdings (SLGN) due to their overlapping yet distinct business models within metal and rigid container markets. This analysis examines their recent performance, operational profiles, and positioning amid evolving economic conditions. The comparison suits those seeking sector-specific insights into relative stability, growth drivers, and risk profiles without favoring one equity over the other. Data draws from established financial platforms to highlight observable trends over recent market activity.
Crown Holdings (CCK) Overview and Recent Performance
Crown Holdings (CCK) manufactures metal packaging primarily for beverage and food applications, serving global consumer and industrial clients. In recent market activity, the stock has reflected steady demand for sustainable packaging solutions, with revenue reported at $3.26 billion in one quarterly update showing year-over-year growth. Broader performance metrics indicate CCK has maintained competitive positioning, contributing to outperformance versus certain peers over extended periods. Sentiment has been supported by operational adjustments and volume trends in key end-markets, though exposure to commodity prices introduces variability. Recent weeks have seen measured price behavior consistent with sector peers navigating supply chain and inflationary pressures.
Silgan Holdings (SLGN) Overview and Recent Performance
Silgan Holdings (SLGN) produces metal, plastic, and closure products for food, beverage, and personal care sectors, offering diversified end-market exposure. Recent market activity shows the stock delivering a year-to-date return of 14.11%, surpassing the S&P 500 benchmark of 10.62%, while its 1-year return reached approximately 13.97%. Earnings release for the second quarter of 2026 is anticipated on July 29, providing a focal point for investor attention. Performance has been influenced by volume stability and pricing discipline amid fluctuating input costs. In recent weeks, SLGN has exhibited resilience, aligning with defensive characteristics of the packaging space despite broader equity market fluctuations.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that highlights select AI trading bots from a library of hundreds designed to trade thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions, including trend consistency and statistical robustness, earn placement in this focused listing. Available bots span varied styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance ranges, with many tracking metrics such as win rates, drawdowns, and trade frequency across diverse asset sets. Users can explore these options to identify automated approaches suited to individual risk parameters and market outlooks.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both companies share metal packaging roots yet differ in diversification: CCK concentrates more on beverage cans while SLGN incorporates broader plastic and closure lines, potentially moderating sector-specific risks. Growth drivers center on sustainability trends and consumer packaged goods demand for each, with CCK showing historical multi-year annualized returns around 8.40% versus SLGN's 6.98% in one long-term analysis. Recent momentum favors relative stability for both amid staples exposure, though SLGN's upcoming earnings provide a distinct near-term differentiator. Risk factors include raw material volatility and macroeconomic sensitivity, with market sentiment reflecting cautious optimism tied to volume trends rather than aggressive expansion. Trade-offs involve CCK's scale in core segments versus SLGN's product breadth for portfolio balance.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative positioning within the packaging sector, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to SLGN due to its year-to-date outperformance against benchmarks and upcoming earnings catalyst. CCK retains appeal through longer-term resilience metrics. This assessment reflects data-driven pattern recognition rather than definitive forecasts and should be weighed alongside individual research.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCK is a Buy and SLGN is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLGN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CCK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SLGN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLGN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SLGN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CCK (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а +2.86% price change this week, while SLGN (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -6.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCK is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
SLGN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Containers/Packaging (+0.64% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| CCK | SLGN | CCK / SLGN | |
| Capitalization | 12.9B | 4.34B | 297% |
| EBITDA | 2.02B | 918M | 220% |
| Gain YTD | 17.100 | 6.772 | 253% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.03 | 16.10 | 106% |
| Revenue | 12.7B | 6.58B | 193% |
| Total Cash | 584M | 435M | 134% |
| Total Debt | 6.47B | 4.66B | 139% |
CCK | SLGN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SLGN's Valuation (31) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as CCK (45). This means that SLGN’s stock grew similarly to CCK’s over the last 12 months.
CCK's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SLGN (84). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
CCK's SMR Rating (37) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SLGN (63). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
CCK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SLGN (46). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
CCK's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SLGN (78). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
| CCK | SLGN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 59% | 8 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 45% |
Advertisement
CCK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCK has been loosely correlated with BALL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCK jumps, then BALL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCK | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| BALL - CCK | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| AVY - CCK | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| SLGN - CCK | 59% Loosely correlated | -11.16% | ||
| GEF - CCK | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.62% | ||
| AMCR - CCK | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||
SLGN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLGN has been loosely correlated with GEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLGN jumps, then GEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLGN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLGN | 100% | -11.16% | ||
| GEF - SLGN | 60% Loosely correlated | +4.62% | ||
| CCK - SLGN | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| AVY - SLGN | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| BALL - SLGN | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| OI - SLGN | 53% Loosely correlated | -15.01% | ||
More | ||||