Advertisement
SLGN vs TRS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLGN is a Buy and TRS is a StrongBuy.
SLGN | TRS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SLGN's Valuation (28) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as TRS (53) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that SLGN’s stock grew similarly to TRS’s over the last 12 months.
TRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as SLGN (100) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that TRS’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
TRS's SMR Rating (15) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLGN (65) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that TRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
TRS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as SLGN (73) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that TRS’s stock grew similarly to SLGN’s over the last 12 months.
SLGN's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRS (95) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that SLGN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRS’s over the last 12 months.
| SLGN | TRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 49% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 5 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 67% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SLGN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TRS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SLGN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SLGN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SLGN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TRS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
SLGN (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -6.71% price change this week, while TRS (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +2.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
SLGN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
TRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Containers/Packaging (-1.17% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XRP | 17.09 | 0.38 | +2.27% |
| Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP) | |||
| AGRH | 26.21 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Interest Rate Hedged US Aggregate | |||
| DDFL | 21.60 | -0.04 | -0.18% |
| Innovator July Trust Units (DDFL) | |||
| MLPX | 72.04 | -0.43 | -0.59% |
| Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) | |||
| UTSL | 29.01 | -0.93 | -3.11% |
| Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X ETF (UTSL) | |||
SLGN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLGN has been loosely correlated with CCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLGN jumps, then CCK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLGN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLGN | 100% | -4.58% | ||
| CCK - SLGN | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| BALL - SLGN | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| SW - SLGN | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| AMCR - SLGN | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| OI - SLGN | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.46% | ||
More | ||||
TRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRS has been loosely correlated with PKG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRS jumps, then PKG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRS | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| PKG - TRS | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| SLGN - TRS | 35% Loosely correlated | -4.58% | ||
| CCK - TRS | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| AMBP - TRS | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| GEF - TRS | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
More | ||||