AMBP
Price
$5.32
Change
-$0.04 (-0.75%)
Updated
Aug 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.18B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRS
Price
$39.57
Change
+$0.19 (+0.48%)
Updated
Aug 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.42B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBP vs TRS

AMBP vs TRS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBP vs. TRS commentary
Aug 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBP is a StrongBuy and TRS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2026
Stock price -- (AMBP: $5.32 vs. TRS: $39.57)
Brand notoriety: AMBP and TRS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBP: 73% vs. TRS: 121%
Market capitalization -- AMBP: $3.18B vs. TRS: $1.42B
AMBP [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $3.18B. TRS’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $1.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $7.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMBP and TRS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRS is a better buy in the short-term than AMBP.

Price Growth

AMBP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а +1.92% price change this week, while TRS (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +2.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

TRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+2.63% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMBP($3.18B) has a higher market cap than TRS($1.42B). AMBP has higher P/E ratio than TRS: AMBP (106.40) vs TRS (18.94). AMBP YTD gains are higher at: 36.179 vs. TRS (11.957). AMBP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 717M vs. TRS (111M). TRS has less debt than AMBP: TRS (439M) vs AMBP (4.34B). AMBP has higher revenues than TRS: AMBP (5.99B) vs TRS (664M).
AMBPTRSAMBP / TRS
Capitalization3.18B1.42B224%
EBITDA717M111M646%
Gain YTD36.17911.957303%
P/E Ratio106.4018.94562%
Revenue5.99B664M902%
Total Cash189MN/A-
Total Debt4.34B439M990%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TRS: Fundamental Ratings
TRS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
18

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBPTRS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLMB23.38N/A
+0.02%
Franklin Municipal Green Bond ETF
IFLO37.71N/A
+0.01%
VictoryShares Intl Free Csh Flow ETF
GJS23.47N/A
N/A
Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities STRATS 2006-2 Goldman Sachs Group
CPNM26.94-0.02
-0.07%
Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Mar
CERY38.15-0.33
-0.86%
State StreetSPDRBbgEnhRlYldCmdStrNoK1ETF

AMBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBP has been loosely correlated with CCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBP jumps, then CCK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBP
1D Price
Change %
AMBP100%
-0.75%
CCK - AMBP
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
AMCR - AMBP
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
BALL - AMBP
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
AVY - AMBP
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.01%
SLGN - AMBP
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
More

TRS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRS has been loosely correlated with AMBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRS jumps, then AMBP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRS
1D Price
Change %
TRS100%
+0.48%
AMBP - TRS
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
PKG - TRS
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
GEF - TRS
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
SON - TRS
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.35%
CCK - TRS
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
More