AMBP
Price
$4.31
Change
-$0.14 (-3.15%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.66B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRS
Price
$39.47
Change
+$0.27 (+0.69%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.41B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBP vs TRS

AMBP vs TRS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBP vs. TRS commentary
Sep 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBP is a Buy and TRS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TRS: Fundamental Ratings
TRS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBPTRS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2026
Stock price -- (AMBP: $4.31 vs. TRS: $39.47)
Brand notoriety: AMBP and TRS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBP: 69% vs. TRS: 120%
Market capitalization -- AMBP: $2.66B vs. TRS: $1.41B
AMBP [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $2.66B. TRS’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $1.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $6.74K to $66.8B. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $6.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while TRS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMBP is a better buy in the long-term than TRS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TRS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRS is a better buy in the short-term than AMBP.

Price Growth

AMBP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -8.30% price change this week, while TRS (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +2.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

TRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-1.17% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

View a ticker or compare two or three
AMBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBB23.710.06
+0.26%
ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB)
PCPI50.120.05
+0.10%
PIMCO Inflation PLUS Active ETF (PCPI)
CSHP99.610.01
+0.01%
iShares Dynamic Short-Term Active ETF (CSHP)
VIOV111.62-0.30
-0.27%
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV)
AUSM24.83-0.11
-0.44%
Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM)

TRS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRS has been loosely correlated with PKG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRS jumps, then PKG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRS
1D Price
Change %
TRS100%
+0.69%
PKG - TRS
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
SLGN - TRS
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.58%
CCK - TRS
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.67%
AMBP - TRS
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
GEF - TRS
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
More