Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SLMCX vs WFSTX
SLMCX vs WFSTX Comparison
Open Charts SLMCX vs WFSTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$155.66
Change+$2.00 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.86B
Allspring Innovation Fund -
Price$12.63
Change+$0.09 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets422.35M
SLMCX vs WFSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLMCX vs. WFSTX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLMCX is a Buy and WFSTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. WFSTX (422M). SLMCX (0.00) and WFSTX (0.00) have matching dividends . SLMCX was incepted earlier than WFSTX: SLMCX (42 years) vs WFSTX (25 years). WFSTX (1.30) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.18). WFSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. SLMCX (33.00). SLMCX (6%) and WFSTX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. WFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: WFSTX (1000) vs SLMCX (2000). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.74 vs. WFSTX (2.79). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 71.51 vs. WFSTX (-29.27).
| SLMCX | WFSTX | SLMCX / WFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.22 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.30 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.511 | 7.547 | 312% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 422M | 4,005% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.74 | 2.79 | 744% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.73 | 11.17 | 597% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.51 | -29.27 | -244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.47 | 20.81 | 834% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement