Ad is loading...
SLMCX vs WFSTX
SLMCX vs WFSTX Comparison
Open Charts SLMCX vs WFSTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$111.35
Change+$0.69 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
Allspring Innovation Fund -
Price$11.79
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets412.49M
SLMCX vs WFSTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLMCX vs. WFSTX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLMCX is a Buy and WFSTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. WFSTX (412M). SLMCX (0.00) and WFSTX (0.00) have matching dividends . SLMCX was incepted earlier than WFSTX: SLMCX (42 years) vs WFSTX (25 years). WFSTX (1.30) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.18). WFSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. SLMCX (39.00). SLMCX (6%) and WFSTX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. WFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: WFSTX (1000) vs SLMCX (2000). WFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.71 vs. SLMCX (-7.40). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.78 vs. WFSTX (-19.08).
| SLMCX | WFSTX | SLMCX / WFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.22 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.30 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.498 | 1.115 | -942% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 412M | 3,010% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.40 | 4.71 | -157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.51 | 3.06 | 376% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.78 | -19.08 | -240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.08 | 8.26 | 1,054% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...