SLVM
Price
$43.33
Change
-$1.35 (-3.02%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.75B
82 days until earnings call
WBNEF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.07 (+87.50%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLVM vs WBNEF

Header iconSLVM vs WBNEF Comparison
Open Charts SLVM vs WBNEFBanner chart's image
Sylvamo
Price$43.33
Change-$1.35 (-3.02%)
Volume$351.3K
Capitalization1.75B
Westbond Enterprises
Price$0.15
Change+$0.07 (+87.50%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization3.11M
SLVM vs WBNEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLVM vs. WBNEF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLVM is a Hold and WBNEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (SLVM: $43.33 vs. WBNEF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: SLVM and WBNEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLVM: 104% vs. WBNEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SLVM: $1.75B vs. WBNEF: $3.11M
SLVM [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $1.75B. WBNEF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $3.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLVM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWBNEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLVM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WBNEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SLVM and WBNEF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLVM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLVM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +7.25% price change this week, while WBNEF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLVM is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-0.73% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVM($1.75B) has a higher market cap than WBNEF($3.11M). WBNEF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SLVM (-43.933). SLVM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 589M vs. WBNEF (1.18M). WBNEF has less debt than SLVM: WBNEF (1.88M) vs SLVM (817M). SLVM has higher revenues than WBNEF: SLVM (3.69B) vs WBNEF (9.05M).
SLVMWBNEFSLVM / WBNEF
Capitalization1.75B3.11M56,274%
EBITDA589M1.18M49,789%
Gain YTD-43.9330.000-
P/E Ratio8.33N/A-
Revenue3.69B9.05M40,780%
Total CashN/A51.9K-
Total Debt817M1.88M43,434%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLVMWBNEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLVX2.08N/A
N/A
HilleVax
DFH28.00-0.04
-0.14%
Dream Finders Homes
PAVM0.45-0.01
-1.40%
PAVmed
PNR104.98-1.65
-1.55%
Pentair plc
SKYT11.41-0.40
-3.39%
SkyWater Technology

SLVM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVM and MERC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVM and MERC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVM
1D Price
Change %
SLVM100%
-3.02%
MERC - SLVM
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
MAGN - SLVM
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
MATV - SLVM
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
SEOAY - SLVM
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
CLW - SLVM
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
More

WBNEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WBNEF and SEOJF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WBNEF and SEOJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBNEF
1D Price
Change %
WBNEF100%
N/A
SEOJF - WBNEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVM - WBNEF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.02%
HLMMF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNODF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NIJPF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More