Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs SOXQ
SMH vs SOXQ Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs SOXQ
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$278.84
Change+$0.42 (+0.15%)
Volume$40.9K
Net Assets25.99B
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
Price$43.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.81K
Net Assets508.58M
SMH vs SOXQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. SOXQ commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Buy and SOXQ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 26B vs. SOXQ (509M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than SOXQ: SMH (14.969) vs SOXQ (11.711). SMH was incepted earlier than SOXQ: SMH (14 years) vs SOXQ (4 years). SOXQ (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). SOXQ has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SMH | SOXQ | SMH / SOXQ | |
| Gain YTD | 14.969 | 11.711 | 128% |
| Net Assets | 26B | 509M | 5,108% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.19 | 184% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 22.00 | 68% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.71 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | SOXQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +2.04% | ||
More | ||||
SOXQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXQ has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXQ jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOXQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOXQ | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| KLAC - SOXQ | 91% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| LRCX - SOXQ | 90% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| AMAT - SOXQ | 88% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| ASML - SOXQ | 84% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| MPWR - SOXQ | 83% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||