SMN
Price
$19.44
Change
-$0.70 (-3.48%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
3.92M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSLQ
Price
$18.68
Change
-$2.22 (-10.62%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
135.14M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMN vs TSLQ

SMN vs TSLQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares UltraShort Materials (SMN) vs. Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ)

Key Takeaways

  • SMN and TSLQ are both leveraged inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs) seeking daily results equal to twice the inverse (-2x) of their respective benchmarks, but they target entirely different exposures: a broad basic materials sector index versus a single technology stock.
  • SMN provides -2x daily exposure to the S&P Materials Select Sector Index through swap agreements, offering diversified sector-level inverse positioning with a net expense ratio of 0.95%.
  • TSLQ delivers -2x daily exposure specifically to Tesla Inc. (TSLA) via swaps and is actively managed with a net expense ratio of 1.17%.
  • Structural differences include SMN’s multi-company index tracking versus TSLQ’s concentrated single-name focus, leading to distinct risk profiles, volatility patterns, and rebalancing requirements typical of leveraged products.
  • Both ETFs suit short-term tactical strategies rather than long-term holdings due to daily reset mechanics, compounding effects, and potential for significant deviation from target multiples over longer periods.
  • Cost structures and liquidity profiles reflect their specialized inverse leveraged nature, with SMN generally offering slightly lower fees while TSLQ provides targeted exposure to one of the market’s most volatile large-cap names.

Introduction

ProShares UltraShort Materials (SMN) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) represent two specialized leveraged inverse strategies that appeal to investors seeking short-term downside protection or tactical bets. They do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they offer alternative exposure within the broader universe of inverse products—one tied to cyclical materials sector dynamics and the other to a single high-volatility growth stock. This comparison highlights how structural features, benchmark choices, and risk characteristics differentiate these vehicles for investors evaluating sector versus single-name inverse opportunities in the current market environment.

ProShares UltraShort Materials (SMN) Overview

ProShares UltraShort Materials (SMN) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times the inverse (-2x) of the daily performance of the S&P Materials Select Sector Index. The fund is passively managed and achieves its objective primarily through total return swap agreements rather than direct short positions in individual securities. It holds no traditional equity positions; exposure is implemented via derivatives on the materials sector index, resulting in effectively broad diversification across numerous companies in the basic materials space. The net expense ratio stands at 0.95%. SMN is structured as an open-end fund with daily rebalancing inherent to its leveraged daily target mandate. Its liquidity profile is modest, consistent with many niche leveraged products, and it has operated since 2007.

Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) Overview

Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times the inverse (-2x) of the daily performance of Tesla Inc. (TSLA) common shares. The strategy relies on swap agreements and other derivatives to deliver the targeted inverse exposure, with at least 80% of assets typically allocated to instruments providing this inverse leverage. TSLQ maintains no diversified holdings beyond its Tesla-focused derivatives positions. The net expense ratio is 1.17%. Launched in 2022, the fund features daily resets typical of leveraged products and carries structural characteristics suited to short-term trading rather than extended holding periods.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The materials sector tracked by SMN encompasses companies involved in chemicals, metals, mining, and construction materials, which are sensitive to global industrial demand, commodity price fluctuations, and economic growth cycles. Meanwhile, Tesla Inc. (TSLA) operates at the intersection of electric vehicles, energy storage, and autonomous technology, influenced by regulatory shifts in emissions standards, battery supply chains, interest rate environments, and competitive dynamics in the automotive and clean energy spaces. Both ETFs operate against a backdrop of evolving macroeconomic conditions, including potential changes in trade policies, energy costs, and sector-specific capital expenditure trends that can drive volatility in materials equities and individual technology names alike.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SMN’s performance has been driven by movements in the broad materials sector, reflecting rotations tied to industrial production data, commodity trends, and global supply chain developments. TSLQ’s results have responded more directly to company-specific factors affecting Tesla Inc. (TSLA), such as earnings reports, production milestones, and shifts in investor sentiment toward growth stocks. The single-name concentration in TSLQ typically produces higher day-to-day volatility compared with SMN’s sector-level diversification. Relative positioning favors SMN for investors seeking broad inverse materials exposure and TSLQ for those targeting precise short-term views on one volatile equity, with both exhibiting the amplified daily moves and potential tracking divergence characteristic of -2x products over multi-week or multi-month horizons.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor ProShares UltraShort Materials (SMN) over Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) with moderate probability. The preference stems from SMN’s modestly lower net expense ratio, broader diversification across the materials sector, and longer operating history, which together suggest more consistent structural characteristics for inverse sector exposure. TSLQ’s concentrated single-stock mandate introduces higher idiosyncratic risk, though it may appeal in scenarios with strong Tesla Inc. (TSLA)-specific downside conviction. Investors should evaluate these factors against their own objectives and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SMN vs. TSLQ commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMN is a Hold and TSLQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSLQ has more net assets: 135M vs. SMN (3.92M). TSLQ has a higher annual dividend yield than SMN: TSLQ (15.088) vs SMN (-25.454). SMN was incepted earlier than TSLQ: SMN (19 years) vs TSLQ (4 years). SMN (0.95) has a lower expense ratio than TSLQ (1.17).
SMNTSLQSMN / TSLQ
Gain YTD-25.45415.088-169%
Net Assets3.92M135M3%
Total Expense Ratio0.951.1781%
TurnoverN/AN/A-
Yield3.6011.5631%
Fund Existence19 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMNTSLQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSLQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRRSX16.380.20
+1.24%
Franklin Real Estate Securities C
PGIEX35.37-0.04
-0.11%
Putnam Focused Equity C
EMCCX64.92-0.35
-0.54%
Empiric Class C
ACFCX75.67-0.92
-1.20%
American Century Focused Dynamic Gr R
OPOCX129.46-4.47
-3.34%
Invesco Discovery A