Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMOG vs TAN
SMOG vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts SMOG vs TAN
SMOG vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMOG vs. TAN commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMOG is a Hold and TAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 1.59B vs. SMOG (135M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than SMOG: TAN (8.143) vs SMOG (7.128). SMOG was incepted earlier than TAN: SMOG (19 years) vs TAN (18 years). SMOG (0.64) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.70). TAN has a higher turnover SMOG (21.00) vs SMOG (21.00).
| SMOG | TAN | SMOG / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | 7.128 | 8.143 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 135M | 1.59B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.70 | 91% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 41.00 | 51% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMOG | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 5 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SMOG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMOG has been loosely correlated with FCEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMOG jumps, then FCEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMOG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMOG | 100% | -1.48% | ||
| FCEL - SMOG | 38% Loosely correlated | -9.27% | ||
| CHPT - SMOG | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.34% | ||
| ENIC - SMOG | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
| WKHS - SMOG | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| LAND - SMOG | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been loosely correlated with BEEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then BEEM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | -3.35% | ||
| BEEM - TAN | 49% Loosely correlated | -4.27% | ||
| FAST - TAN | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
| JKS - TAN | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.30% | ||
| DQ - TAN | 2% Poorly correlated | -6.21% | ||
| HASI - TAN | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||