Advertisement
SONM vs UTSI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SONM is a Hold and UTSI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SONM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUTSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SONM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UTSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SONM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTSI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SONM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UTSI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SONM (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -6.92% price change this week, while UTSI (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -3.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +9.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.21%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -6.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.28%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+9.67% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Telecommunications Equipment (-6.52% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
| SONM | UTSI | SONM / UTSI | |
| Capitalization | 4.81M | 22.3M | 22% |
| EBITDA | -6.15M | -7.69M | 80% |
| Gain YTD | 2.540 | -7.480 | -34% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 9.79M | - |
| Total Cash | 1.2M | 40.5M | 3% |
| Total Debt | 1.07M | 1.11M | 97% |
SONM | UTSI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UTSI's Valuation (13) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SONM (67). This means that UTSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than SONM’s over the last 12 months.
UTSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as SONM (100). This means that UTSI’s stock grew similarly to SONM’s over the last 12 months.
UTSI's SMR Rating (95) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as SONM (100). This means that UTSI’s stock grew similarly to SONM’s over the last 12 months.
SONM's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as UTSI (70). This means that SONM’s stock grew similarly to UTSI’s over the last 12 months.
SONM's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTSI (100). This means that SONM’s stock grew significantly faster than UTSI’s over the last 12 months.
| SONM | UTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 12 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | N/A |
Advertisement
SONM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SONM and CIEN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SONM and CIEN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SONM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONM | 100% | -6.10% | ||
| CIEN - SONM | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.84% | ||
| GPRO - SONM | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.44% | ||
| LITE - SONM | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
| AUDC - SONM | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| CSCO - SONM | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
More | ||||
UTSI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UTSI and LTRX have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UTSI and LTRX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UTSI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTSI | 100% | +4.91% | ||
| LTRX - UTSI | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
| BKTI - UTSI | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| SONM - UTSI | 8% Poorly correlated | -6.10% | ||
| OCC - UTSI | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.91% | ||
| CMTL - UTSI | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
More | ||||