SPMO
Price
$144.28
Change
-$8.55 (-5.59%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
20.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VTI
Price
$363.38
Change
-$10.00 (-2.68%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
2.31T
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SPMO vs VTI

Header iconSPMO vs VTI Comparison
Open Charts SPMO vs VTIBanner chart's image
SPMO vs VTI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) vs. Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI)

Key Takeaways

  • SPMO targets the top momentum stocks within the S&P 500 using a rules-based factor strategy, while VTI provides broad, market-cap-weighted exposure to the entire U.S. equity market.
  • SPMO holds approximately 100 securities with concentrated exposure to high-momentum names, whereas VTI holds over 3,500 stocks across large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap segments for maximum diversification.
  • SPMO carries a higher expense ratio of 0.13% compared with VTI’s 0.03%, reflecting the active rebalancing required for momentum selection versus VTI’s passive indexing approach.
  • SPMO exhibits greater sector concentration in technology and higher volatility tied to momentum cycles, while VTI offers balanced sector exposure and lower relative volatility through broad market participation.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and listed on major U.S. exchanges, yet they serve distinct roles: SPMO for investors seeking factor-driven outperformance and VTI for core, low-cost market beta.
  • In the current environment of sector rotation and earnings momentum, SPMO’s concentrated holdings may amplify gains or losses relative to VTI’s diversified profile during recent market cycles.

Introduction

Investors comparing momentum-focused and broad-market strategies often evaluate Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) to align portfolios with specific risk and return objectives. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they represent complementary approaches to U.S. equity exposure. SPMO applies a momentum factor overlay on large-cap stocks, while VTI delivers comprehensive market representation. The comparison helps investors understand trade-offs between concentrated factor exposure and broad diversification in today’s market environment.

Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) Overview

SPMO seeks to track the S&P 500 Momentum Index, which selects approximately 100 stocks from the S&P 500 with the highest momentum scores based on recent price performance adjusted for volatility. The ETF holds roughly 100 securities and is rebalanced periodically to maintain alignment with the index methodology. Top holdings typically include technology leaders such as Micron Technology and NVIDIA, contributing to significant sector allocations in information technology (often exceeding 50%), industrials, and communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.13%. As a passive, factor-based ETF, SPMO distinguishes itself through systematic momentum selection rather than market-cap weighting, resulting in a more concentrated and potentially higher-volatility profile.

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) Overview

VTI seeks to track the CRSP US Total Market Index, which represents nearly 100% of the investable U.S. equity market, including large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap stocks. The ETF holds approximately 3,500 securities using a sampling approach to replicate index characteristics. Top holdings include major companies such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet, though no single position dominates due to the broad construction. Sector allocations reflect the overall market, with balanced exposure across technology, financials, healthcare, and consumer sectors. The expense ratio is 0.03%. VTI operates as a passive, market-cap-weighted ETF designed for comprehensive diversification and low-cost core equity exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. equity market continues to experience sector rotation driven by earnings growth in technology, artificial intelligence advancements, and shifting interest-rate expectations. Capital flows have favored high-momentum names in recent market cycles, while broader market participants benefit from participation across market-capitalization segments. Regulatory developments around technology and antitrust remain relevant, alongside macroeconomic factors such as inflation trends and corporate earnings resilience. Risks include potential momentum reversals in concentrated sectors and valuation pressures across the broader market during periods of economic uncertainty.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, SPMO’s momentum-driven selection has positioned it to capture outsized gains from strong-performing large-cap stocks during favorable market cycles, though it may experience sharper drawdowns during rotations away from momentum leaders. VTI’s broad diversification has delivered more stable participation across market segments, with lower sensitivity to individual sector swings. Relative positioning highlights SPMO’s higher beta to momentum factors versus VTI’s closer alignment with overall market returns. Both have navigated earnings cycles and macro shifts, but SPMO’s concentrated holdings amplify exposure to volatility differences compared with VTI’s comprehensive market representation.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor VTI for its superior cost efficiency, extensive diversification across thousands of holdings, and consistent broad-market participation with lower relative risk exposure. SPMO offers compelling momentum-driven positioning for investors seeking factor exposure, yet its higher expense ratio and concentrated holdings introduce greater volatility. The probabilistic preference leans toward VTI for core portfolio allocation in most market environments due to its durable low-cost and diversified profile.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SPMO vs. VTI commentary
Jun 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPMO is a Hold and VTI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTI has more net assets: 2.31T vs. SPMO (20.4B). SPMO has a higher annual dividend yield than VTI: SPMO (21.261) vs VTI (8.406). SPMO was incepted earlier than VTI: SPMO (11 years) vs VTI (25 years). VTI (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than SPMO (0.13). SPMO has a higher turnover VTI (3.00) vs VTI (3.00).
SPMOVTISPMO / VTI
Gain YTD21.2618.406253%
Net Assets20.4B2.31T1%
Total Expense Ratio0.130.03433%
Turnover44.003.001,467%
Yield0.671.0167%
Fund Existence11 years25 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPMOVTI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPMO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VTI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBSX27.091.43
+5.59%
Regan Fixed Rate Mbs ETF
DGZ5.730.12
+2.19%
DB Gold Short ETN
VCRB76.64-0.31
-0.40%
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
SEPW33.13-0.14
-0.42%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF
EIM9.70-0.06
-0.61%
Eaton Vance Municipal

SPMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMO has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMO jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPMO
1D Price
Change %
SPMO100%
-5.59%
LRCX - SPMO
69%
Closely correlated
-9.85%
AVGO - SPMO
66%
Closely correlated
-7.92%
KLAC - SPMO
64%
Loosely correlated
-9.47%
AMAT - SPMO
64%
Loosely correlated
-9.71%
ETN - SPMO
63%
Loosely correlated
-5.42%
More