Investors comparing momentum-focused and broad-market strategies often evaluate Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) to align portfolios with specific risk and return objectives. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they represent complementary approaches to U.S. equity exposure. SPMO applies a momentum factor overlay on large-cap stocks, while VTI delivers comprehensive market representation. The comparison helps investors understand trade-offs between concentrated factor exposure and broad diversification in today’s market environment.
SPMO seeks to track the S&P 500 Momentum Index, which selects approximately 100 stocks from the S&P 500 with the highest momentum scores based on recent price performance adjusted for volatility. The ETF holds roughly 100 securities and is rebalanced periodically to maintain alignment with the index methodology. Top holdings typically include technology leaders such as Micron Technology and NVIDIA, contributing to significant sector allocations in information technology (often exceeding 50%), industrials, and communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.13%. As a passive, factor-based ETF, SPMO distinguishes itself through systematic momentum selection rather than market-cap weighting, resulting in a more concentrated and potentially higher-volatility profile.
VTI seeks to track the CRSP US Total Market Index, which represents nearly 100% of the investable U.S. equity market, including large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap stocks. The ETF holds approximately 3,500 securities using a sampling approach to replicate index characteristics. Top holdings include major companies such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet, though no single position dominates due to the broad construction. Sector allocations reflect the overall market, with balanced exposure across technology, financials, healthcare, and consumer sectors. The expense ratio is 0.03%. VTI operates as a passive, market-cap-weighted ETF designed for comprehensive diversification and low-cost core equity exposure.
The U.S. equity market continues to experience sector rotation driven by earnings growth in technology, artificial intelligence advancements, and shifting interest-rate expectations. Capital flows have favored high-momentum names in recent market cycles, while broader market participants benefit from participation across market-capitalization segments. Regulatory developments around technology and antitrust remain relevant, alongside macroeconomic factors such as inflation trends and corporate earnings resilience. Risks include potential momentum reversals in concentrated sectors and valuation pressures across the broader market during periods of economic uncertainty.
In recent weeks and months, SPMO’s momentum-driven selection has positioned it to capture outsized gains from strong-performing large-cap stocks during favorable market cycles, though it may experience sharper drawdowns during rotations away from momentum leaders. VTI’s broad diversification has delivered more stable participation across market segments, with lower sensitivity to individual sector swings. Relative positioning highlights SPMO’s higher beta to momentum factors versus VTI’s closer alignment with overall market returns. Both have navigated earnings cycles and macro shifts, but SPMO’s concentrated holdings amplify exposure to volatility differences compared with VTI’s comprehensive market representation.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor VTI for its superior cost efficiency, extensive diversification across thousands of holdings, and consistent broad-market participation with lower relative risk exposure. SPMO offers compelling momentum-driven positioning for investors seeking factor exposure, yet its higher expense ratio and concentrated holdings introduce greater volatility. The probabilistic preference leans toward VTI for core portfolio allocation in most market environments due to its durable low-cost and diversified profile.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| SPMO | VTI | SPMO / VTI | |
| Gain YTD | 21.261 | 8.406 | 253% |
| Net Assets | 20.4B | 2.31T | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 0.03 | 433% |
| Turnover | 44.00 | 3.00 | 1,467% |
| Yield | 0.67 | 1.01 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| SPMO | VTI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 19 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMO has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMO jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPMO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPMO | 100% | -5.59% | ||
| LRCX - SPMO | 69% Closely correlated | -9.85% | ||
| AVGO - SPMO | 66% Closely correlated | -7.92% | ||
| KLAC - SPMO | 64% Loosely correlated | -9.47% | ||
| AMAT - SPMO | 64% Loosely correlated | -9.71% | ||
| ETN - SPMO | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.42% | ||
More | ||||