SQM
Price
$43.68
Change
-$0.76 (-1.71%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
12.48B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SSL
Price
$5.48
Change
-$0.39 (-6.64%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.78B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SQM vs SSL

Header iconSQM vs SSL Comparison
Open Charts SQM vs SSLBanner chart's image
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$43.68
Change-$0.76 (-1.71%)
Volume$1.07M
Capitalization12.48B
Sasol
Price$5.48
Change-$0.39 (-6.64%)
Volume$1.46M
Capitalization3.78B
SQM vs SSL Comparison Chart in %
SQM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SQM vs. SSL commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SQM is a Hold and SSL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SQM: $43.68 vs. SSL: $5.48)
Brand notoriety: SQM and SSL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SQM: 84% vs. SSL: 113%
Market capitalization -- SQM: $12.48B vs. SSL: $3.78B
SQM [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $12.48B. SSL’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $211.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SQM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSSL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SQM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSL is a better buy in the long-term than SQM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SQM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SQM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SQM is a better buy in the short-term than SSL.

Price Growth

SQM (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +7.14% price change this week, while SSL (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -2.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

SQM is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

SSL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.39% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SQM($12.5B) has a higher market cap than SSL($3.78B). SQM has higher P/E ratio than SSL: SQM (26.13) vs SSL (9.03). SSL (20.175) and SQM (20.132) have similar YTD gains . SSL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.6B vs. SQM (937M). SSL has more cash in the bank: 46.7B vs. SQM (2.23B). SQM has less debt than SSL: SQM (4.74B) vs SSL (121B). SSL has higher revenues than SQM: SSL (249B) vs SQM (4.23B).
SQMSSLSQM / SSL
Capitalization12.5B3.78B331%
EBITDA937M35.6B3%
Gain YTD20.13220.175100%
P/E Ratio26.139.03289%
Revenue4.23B249B2%
Total Cash2.23B46.7B5%
Total Debt4.74B121B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM vs SSL: Fundamental Ratings
SQM
SSL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
105
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10065
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSL's Valuation (31) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SQM (82) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that SSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SQM’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as SSL (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew similarly to SSL’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's SMR Rating (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as SSL (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew similarly to SSL’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as SSL (48) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew similarly to SSL’s over the last 12 months.

SSL's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SQM (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that SSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SQM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SQMSSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SQM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XDQQ38.000.28
+0.74%
Innovator Gr 100 Acltd ETF™ Quarterly
MAGY55.750.10
+0.18%
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
MEAR50.440.04
+0.08%
iShares Short Maturity Muni Bd Act ETF
ERC9.30-0.08
-0.85%
Allspring Multi-Sector Income Fund
SATO27.31-0.69
-2.46%
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Eco ETF

SQM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQM
1D Price
Change %
SQM100%
-1.71%
ALB - SQM
77%
Closely correlated
-2.68%
OLN - SQM
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
HUN - SQM
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
DD - SQM
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
SXYAY - SQM
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
More

SSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSL has been loosely correlated with LXU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSL jumps, then LXU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSL
1D Price
Change %
SSL100%
-6.64%
LXU - SSL
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
DD - SSL
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
MEOH - SSL
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
REX - SSL
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
BASFY - SSL
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
More