SQNS
Price
$3.48
Change
-$0.54 (-13.43%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
52.12M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VLN
Price
$2.11
Change
-$1.12 (-34.67%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
223.07M
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SQNS vs VLN

Header iconSQNS vs VLN Comparison
Open Charts SQNS vs VLNBanner chart's image
SQNS vs VLN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SQNS vs. VLN commentary
Jun 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SQNS is a StrongBuy and VLN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2026
Stock price -- (SQNS: $3.48 vs. VLN: $2.11)
Brand notoriety: SQNS and VLN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SQNS: 87% vs. VLN: 501%
Market capitalization -- SQNS: $52.12M vs. VLN: $223.07M
SQNS [@Semiconductors] is valued at $52.12M. VLN’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $223.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.97T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $187.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SQNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SQNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLN is a better buy in the long-term than SQNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SQNS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SQNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VLN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SQNS is a better buy in the short-term than VLN.

Price Growth

SQNS (@Semiconductors) experienced а -21.80% price change this week, while VLN (@Semiconductors) price change was -40.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -7.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +77.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

VLN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-7.85% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLN($223M) has a higher market cap than SQNS($52.1M). VLN YTD gains are higher at: 48.592 vs. SQNS (-22.494). VLN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -28.35M vs. SQNS (-31.81M). VLN has more cash in the bank: 92.6M vs. SQNS (10.6M). VLN has less debt than SQNS: VLN (8.24M) vs SQNS (50.6M). VLN has higher revenues than SQNS: VLN (70.6M) vs SQNS (25.2M).
SQNSVLNSQNS / VLN
Capitalization52.1M223M23%
EBITDA-31.81M-28.35M112%
Gain YTD-22.49448.592-46%
P/E Ratio0.30N/A-
Revenue25.2M70.6M36%
Total Cash10.6M92.6M11%
Total Debt50.6M8.24M614%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQNS: Fundamental Ratings
SQNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SQNSVLN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SQNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VARCX10.56-0.01
-0.09%
First Trust Merger Arbitrage Cl C
JHERX15.05-0.23
-1.51%
JHancock Equity Income C
JMCCX59.93-0.94
-1.54%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity C
WLCVX23.66-0.40
-1.66%
Wilshire Large Company Value Instl
UIVNX12.34-0.25
-1.99%
MFS Intrinsic Equity R2

SQNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SQNS and POET have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SQNS and POET's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQNS
1D Price
Change %
SQNS100%
-13.43%
POET - SQNS
27%
Poorly correlated
-23.36%
VLN - SQNS
25%
Poorly correlated
-34.67%
DVLT - SQNS
25%
Poorly correlated
-8.01%
COHU - SQNS
25%
Poorly correlated
-10.86%
NVTS - SQNS
24%
Poorly correlated
-18.23%
More

VLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLN has been loosely correlated with CEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VLN jumps, then CEVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLN
1D Price
Change %
VLN100%
-34.67%
CEVA - VLN
43%
Loosely correlated
-12.11%
MRAM - VLN
41%
Loosely correlated
-16.75%
VSH - VLN
40%
Loosely correlated
-10.16%
AIP - VLN
38%
Loosely correlated
-7.82%
SYNA - VLN
38%
Loosely correlated
-12.98%
More