ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) represent distinct leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) strategies targeting amplified daily returns from major U.S. equity benchmarks. They do not compete directly but serve as alternative vehicles for investors seeking leveraged exposure within the same broad goal of enhanced equity participation. SSO provides 2x leverage on the diversified S&P 500, while TQQQ applies 3x leverage to the technology- and growth-oriented Nasdaq-100. This comparison highlights structural differences that influence their behavior across market cycles.
ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund typically holds a combination of swaps, futures, and other derivatives to achieve leverage, resulting in effective exposure to roughly 500 underlying holdings mirroring the index. Top holdings reflect S&P 500 weights, led by companies such as NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corp. Sector allocations include technology at approximately 39%, financial services at 11%, and communication services at 11%. The net expense ratio is 0.87%. As a passive leveraged ETF, it resets exposure daily and emphasizes broad-market beta rather than active security selection.
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund uses swaps and derivatives to deliver leverage on approximately 100 large non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq. Top underlying holdings emphasize growth names including NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc., and Tesla Inc. Sector allocations show pronounced concentration, with technology at approximately 54% and communication services at 16%. The net expense ratio is 0.82%. Like SSO, it is a passive leveraged product with daily resets, but its higher leverage and narrower index produce greater sensitivity to technology and growth trends.
Both ETFs operate within the U.S. large-cap equity environment, influenced by technology innovation, artificial intelligence adoption, and macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and corporate earnings growth. The Nasdaq-100 and S&P 500 have benefited from capital flows into growth-oriented sectors amid ongoing digital transformation. Regulatory developments around technology competition and potential shifts in monetary policy remain key variables. Sector risks include valuation compression in high-multiple technology names and broader market volatility tied to economic data releases. These dynamics affect leveraged products through amplified exposure to both upside momentum and downside corrections in their respective benchmarks.
In recent market cycles, TQQQ has exhibited higher volatility due to its 3x leverage and concentrated technology exposure, leading to more pronounced moves during sector rotations favoring or against growth stocks. SSO, with 2x leverage on a broader index, has provided more moderated amplification of overall market returns, showing relatively lower sensitivity to individual sector swings. Performance differences stem from the underlying indices’ composition, with TQQQ benefiting more from earnings strength in technology leaders and SSO capturing diversified participation across value and growth segments. Relative positioning favors SSO for investors prioritizing balance and TQQQ for those targeting higher-beta technology momentum.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.
Based on observable factors including structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, trend consistency, sector momentum, and risk exposure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Its lower expense ratio, elevated leverage, and alignment with prevailing technology sector momentum support this probabilistic assessment relative to the more diversified but lower-leverage ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO).
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| SSO | TQQQ | SSO / TQQQ | |
| Gain YTD | 12.952 | 41.431 | 31% |
| Net Assets | 7.68B | 39B | 20% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.82 | 106% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 25.00 | 16% |
| Yield | 0.61 | 0.37 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| SSO | TQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ITOL | 26.57 | N/A | N/A |
| Tema International Durable Quality ETF | |||
| DSEP | 47.10 | -0.22 | -0.46% |
| FT Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Sep | |||
| KOOL | 14.20 | -0.25 | -1.72% |
| North Shore Equity Rotation ETF | |||
| HBTA | 31.90 | -0.76 | -2.31% |
| Horizon Expedition Plus ETF | |||
| XNTK | 368.47 | -21.11 | -5.42% |
| State Street® SPDR® NYSE Technology ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TQQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TQQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TQQQ | 100% | -9.86% | ||
| LRCX - TQQQ | 72% Closely correlated | -9.33% | ||
| NVDA - TQQQ | 70% Closely correlated | -4.13% | ||
| KLAC - TQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | -9.17% | ||
| AMAT - TQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | -8.48% | ||
| ASML - TQQQ | 66% Closely correlated | -7.82% | ||
More | ||||