SSO
Price
$65.07
Change
-$0.21 (-0.32%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.68B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TQQQ
Price
$73.25
Change
-$1.19 (-1.60%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
39.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SSO vs TQQQ

SSO vs TQQQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) vs. ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ)

Key Takeaways

  • ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) delivers 2x daily exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) provides 3x daily exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, resulting in significantly different risk and return profiles.
  • SSO offers broader diversification across approximately 500 large- and mid-cap U.S. companies, whereas TQQQ concentrates on 100 large non-financial Nasdaq-listed firms with heavier technology weighting.
  • Both ETFs employ leveraged strategies with daily resets, making them suitable primarily for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold portfolios due to compounding effects.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.87% for SSO and 0.82% for TQQQ, reflecting the structural costs of leverage implementation via swaps and derivatives.
  • Sector allocations differ markedly, with SSO featuring balanced exposure (technology around 39%) compared to TQQQ’s technology-dominant profile (around 54%).
  • Structural characteristics position SSO for market-wide amplification and TQQQ for amplified growth-sector beta within similar investor objectives of enhanced equity exposure.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) represent distinct leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) strategies targeting amplified daily returns from major U.S. equity benchmarks. They do not compete directly but serve as alternative vehicles for investors seeking leveraged exposure within the same broad goal of enhanced equity participation. SSO provides 2x leverage on the diversified S&P 500, while TQQQ applies 3x leverage to the technology- and growth-oriented Nasdaq-100. This comparison highlights structural differences that influence their behavior across market cycles.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund typically holds a combination of swaps, futures, and other derivatives to achieve leverage, resulting in effective exposure to roughly 500 underlying holdings mirroring the index. Top holdings reflect S&P 500 weights, led by companies such as NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corp. Sector allocations include technology at approximately 39%, financial services at 11%, and communication services at 11%. The net expense ratio is 0.87%. As a passive leveraged ETF, it resets exposure daily and emphasizes broad-market beta rather than active security selection.

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) Overview

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund uses swaps and derivatives to deliver leverage on approximately 100 large non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq. Top underlying holdings emphasize growth names including NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc., and Tesla Inc. Sector allocations show pronounced concentration, with technology at approximately 54% and communication services at 16%. The net expense ratio is 0.82%. Like SSO, it is a passive leveraged product with daily resets, but its higher leverage and narrower index produce greater sensitivity to technology and growth trends.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the U.S. large-cap equity environment, influenced by technology innovation, artificial intelligence adoption, and macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and corporate earnings growth. The Nasdaq-100 and S&P 500 have benefited from capital flows into growth-oriented sectors amid ongoing digital transformation. Regulatory developments around technology competition and potential shifts in monetary policy remain key variables. Sector risks include valuation compression in high-multiple technology names and broader market volatility tied to economic data releases. These dynamics affect leveraged products through amplified exposure to both upside momentum and downside corrections in their respective benchmarks.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, TQQQ has exhibited higher volatility due to its 3x leverage and concentrated technology exposure, leading to more pronounced moves during sector rotations favoring or against growth stocks. SSO, with 2x leverage on a broader index, has provided more moderated amplification of overall market returns, showing relatively lower sensitivity to individual sector swings. Performance differences stem from the underlying indices’ composition, with TQQQ benefiting more from earnings strength in technology leaders and SSO capturing diversified participation across value and growth segments. Relative positioning favors SSO for investors prioritizing balance and TQQQ for those targeting higher-beta technology momentum.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, trend consistency, sector momentum, and risk exposure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Its lower expense ratio, elevated leverage, and alignment with prevailing technology sector momentum support this probabilistic assessment relative to the more diversified but lower-leverage ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO).

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SSO vs. TQQQ commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSO is a Hold and TQQQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TQQQ has more net assets: 39B vs. SSO (7.68B). TQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than SSO: TQQQ (41.431) vs SSO (12.952). SSO was incepted earlier than TQQQ: SSO (20 years) vs TQQQ (16 years). TQQQ (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than SSO (0.87). TQQQ has a higher turnover SSO (4.00) vs SSO (4.00).
SSOTQQQSSO / TQQQ
Gain YTD12.95241.43131%
Net Assets7.68B39B20%
Total Expense Ratio0.870.82106%
Turnover4.0025.0016%
Yield0.610.37165%
Fund Existence20 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSOTQQQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITOL26.57N/A
N/A
Tema International Durable Quality ETF
DSEP47.10-0.22
-0.46%
FT Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Sep
KOOL14.20-0.25
-1.72%
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
HBTA31.90-0.76
-2.31%
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF
XNTK368.47-21.11
-5.42%
State Street® SPDR® NYSE Technology ETF

TQQQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TQQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TQQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TQQQ
1D Price
Change %
TQQQ100%
-9.86%
LRCX - TQQQ
72%
Closely correlated
-9.33%
NVDA - TQQQ
70%
Closely correlated
-4.13%
KLAC - TQQQ
68%
Closely correlated
-9.17%
AMAT - TQQQ
67%
Closely correlated
-8.48%
ASML - TQQQ
66%
Closely correlated
-7.82%
More