It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
STC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
STC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
STC (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +4.25% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +9.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.92%.
STC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
UFCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
STC | UFCS | STC / UFCS | |
Capitalization | 1.77B | 550M | 322% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 1.813 | 3.235 | 56% |
P/E Ratio | 57.68 | 41.53 | 139% |
Revenue | 2.26B | 1.1B | 206% |
Total Cash | 272M | 102M | 267% |
Total Debt | 581M | 50M | 1,162% |
STC | UFCS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STC's Valuation (31) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (41) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that STC’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.
STC's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that STC’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.
UFCS's SMR Rating (78) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as STC (87) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to STC’s over the last 12 months.
UFCS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as STC (52) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to STC’s over the last 12 months.
UFCS's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as STC (94) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to STC’s over the last 12 months.
STC | UFCS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 1 day ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 7 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STC has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STC jumps, then L could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
STC | 100% | -0.31% | ||
L - STC | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
HMN - STC | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.50% | ||
KMPR - STC | 48% Loosely correlated | +4.54% | ||
UFCS - STC | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
MKL - STC | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.93% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been closely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UFCS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UFCS | 100% | +1.11% | ||
SAFT - UFCS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
CINF - UFCS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
L - UFCS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
AFG - UFCS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
THG - UFCS | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.29% | ||
More |