SU
Price
$34.96
Change
+$0.71 (+2.07%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
48.23B
72 days until earnings call
XOM
Price
$107.31
Change
+$1.24 (+1.17%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
461.22B
74 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SU vs XOM

Header iconSU vs XOM Comparison
Open Charts SU vs XOMBanner chart's image
Suncor Energy
Price$34.96
Change+$0.71 (+2.07%)
Volume$4.91M
Capitalization48.23B
Exxon Mobil
Price$107.31
Change+$1.24 (+1.17%)
Volume$10.99M
Capitalization461.22B
SU vs XOM Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SU vs. XOM commentary
May 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SU is a Buy and XOM is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2025
Stock price -- (SU: $34.96 vs. XOM: $107.31)
Brand notoriety: SU and XOM are both notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SU: 92% vs. XOM: 60%
Market capitalization -- SU: $48.23B vs. XOM: $461.22B
SU [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $48.23B. XOM’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $461.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXOM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XOM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the long-term than XOM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XOM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XOM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XOM is a better buy in the short-term than SU.

Price Growth

SU (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -3.02% price change this week, while XOM (@Integrated Oil) price change was +1.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

SU is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

XOM is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+1.64% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOM($461B) has a higher market cap than SU($48.2B). XOM has higher P/E ratio than SU: XOM (13.16) vs SU (7.96). XOM YTD gains are higher at: 0.651 vs. SU (-2.018). XOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74.3B vs. SU (17.8B). XOM has more cash in the bank: 31.5B vs. SU (1.73B). SU has less debt than XOM: SU (15.4B) vs XOM (41.6B). XOM has higher revenues than SU: XOM (335B) vs SU (52.2B).
SUXOMSU / XOM
Capitalization48.2B461B10%
EBITDA17.8B74.3B24%
Gain YTD-2.0180.651-310%
P/E Ratio7.9613.1661%
Revenue52.2B335B16%
Total Cash1.73B31.5B5%
Total Debt15.4B41.6B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SU vs XOM: Fundamental Ratings
SU
XOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3424
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
316
SMR RATING
1..100
5655
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3549
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SU's Valuation (34) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XOM (88). This means that SU’s stock grew somewhat faster than XOM’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (31). This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's SMR Rating (55) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (56). This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (59). This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

SU's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as XOM (49). This means that SU’s stock grew similarly to XOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUXOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COLM66.081.43
+2.21%
Columbia Sportswear Company
NEM53.981.15
+2.18%
Newmont Corp
REFI14.970.12
+0.81%
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance
KIRK1.18-0.01
-0.84%
Kirkland's
APLD5.39-0.11
-2.00%
Applied Digital Corp

XOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOM has been closely correlated with CVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOM jumps, then CVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOM
1D Price
Change %
XOM100%
+1.17%
CVX - XOM
82%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
SU - XOM
77%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
SHEL - XOM
76%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
IMO - XOM
72%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
CVE - XOM
71%
Closely correlated
+3.76%
More