SU
Price
$33.88
Change
-$0.31 (-0.91%)
Updated
Sep 22, 6:59 PM EST
39 days until earnings call
XOM
Price
$114.97
Change
+$0.21 (+0.18%)
Updated
Sep 22, 6:59 PM EST
41 days until earnings call

Compare trend and price SU vs XOM

Header iconSU vs XOM Comparison
Open Charts SU vs XOMBanner chart's image
Suncor Energy
Price$33.88
Change-$0.31 (-0.91%)
Volume$1.38M
CapitalizationN/A
Exxon Mobil
Price$114.97
Change+$0.21 (+0.18%)
Volume$4.52M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
SU vs XOM Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
SU vs. XOM commentary
Sep 23, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SU is a StrongSell and XOM is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 23, 2023
Stock price -- (SU: $33.88 vs. XOM: $114.94)
Brand notoriety: SU and XOM are both notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SU: 151% vs. XOM: 88%
Market capitalization -- SU: $44.49B vs. XOM: $457.49B
SU [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $44.49B. XOM’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $457.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $457.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $59.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXOM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SU and XOM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XOM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XOM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the short-term than XOM.

Price Growth

SU (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -3.45% price change this week, while XOM (@Integrated Oil) price change was -1.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

SU is expected to report earnings on Nov 01, 2023.

XOM is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-1.01% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for SU with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for XOM with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOM($457B) has a higher market cap than SU($44.5B). SU has higher P/E ratio than XOM: SU (9.93) vs XOM (9.18). XOM (6.788) and SU (6.776) have similar YTD gains . XOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 92.7B vs. SU (18.8B). XOM has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. SU (2.61B). SU has less debt than XOM: SU (17B) vs XOM (41.5B). XOM has higher revenues than SU: XOM (364B) vs SU (57.1B).
SUXOMSU / XOM
Capitalization44.5B457B10%
EBITDA18.8B92.7B20%
Gain YTD6.7766.788100%
P/E Ratio9.939.18108%
Revenue57.1B364B16%
Total Cash2.61B29.5B9%
Total Debt17B41.5B41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SU vs XOM: Fundamental Ratings
SU
XOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8081
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
5736
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4113
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1965
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SU's Valuation (46) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XOM (81). This means that SU’s stock grew somewhat faster than XOM’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for SU (100). This means that XOM’s stock grew significantly faster than SU’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's SMR Rating (36) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (57). This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (41). This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

SU's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XOM (65). This means that SU’s stock grew somewhat faster than XOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUXOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AOSL29.631.05
+3.67%
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited
INTT14.930.14
+0.95%
inTEST Corp
CBIO0.49N/A
-0.57%
Catalyst Biosciences
ES62.58-0.76
-1.19%
Eversource Energy
BHC8.22-0.17
-2.03%
Bausch Health Companies

SU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SU has been closely correlated with CVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SU jumps, then CVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SU
1D Price
Change %
SU100%
-0.91%
CVE - SU
85%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
IMO - SU
82%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
CVX - SU
80%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
XOM - SU
79%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
SHEL - SU
76%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
More

XOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOM has been closely correlated with CVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOM jumps, then CVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOM
1D Price
Change %
XOM100%
+0.16%
CVX - XOM
88%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
SU - XOM
80%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
CVE - XOM
78%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
IMO - XOM
77%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
BP - XOM
77%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
More