TQQQ
Price
$74.39
Change
-$8.19 (-9.92%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:18 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
39.74B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
URTY
Price
$83.25
Change
-$2.59 (-3.02%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:19 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
377.53M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TQQQ vs URTY

TQQQ vs URTY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) vs. ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY)

Key Takeaways

  • Both TQQQ and URTY are 3x leveraged ETFs designed for daily performance targets, using derivatives like swaps for exposure, but TQQQ focuses on the tech-heavy Nasdaq-100 Index while URTY targets the diversified small-cap Russell 2000 Index.
  • TQQQ offers concentrated exposure to large-cap growth (e.g., NVDA, AAPL, MSFT), with ~54% in technology; URTY provides broader small-cap diversification across healthcare (~16%), financials (~16%), industrials (~18%), and technology (~17%).
  • TQQQ boasts superior liquidity with average daily volume exceeding 68 million shares and a tight 0.02% bid-ask spread, compared to URTY's ~842,000 shares and 0.05% spread.
  • TQQQ's net expense ratio is lower at 0.82% versus URTY's 0.95%, enhancing cost efficiency for its large-cap focus.
  • Both exhibit high volatility due to daily resets and leverage, unsuitable for long-term holding, but TQQQ benefits from mega-cap stability while URTY amplifies small-cap cyclical swings.
  • URTY shows stronger relative positioning in recent small-cap rotations, while TQQQ drives outsized gains in tech-led cycles.

Introduction

In the current market environment, TQQQ and URTY represent high-octane leveraged strategies for investors seeking amplified exposure to distinct equity segments. TQQQ triples the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index, dominated by technology mega-caps, while URTY leverages the Russell 2000 Index of small-cap stocks. Though not direct competitors, they offer alternative paths to equity upside: TQQQ for growth-oriented tech bets, URTY for cyclical small-cap plays. Amid ongoing sector rotation from large-cap tech to undervalued small caps, driven by interest rate dynamics and economic resilience, this ETF comparison highlights their structural differences, risk profiles, and positioning for tactical allocation in volatile conditions.

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) Overview

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times (3x) the Nasdaq-100 Index, a benchmark of 101 large non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq, heavily weighted toward technology leaders. Launched in 2010, this leveraged ETF employs derivatives such as swaps and futures contracts, alongside direct equity holdings and cash equivalents like money market ETFs for collateral. It holds approximately 122 securities, with top exposures including NVDA (~3.5%), AAPL (~2.9%), MSFT (~2.2%), and AMZN (~2.1%). Sector allocation emphasizes technology (54%), communication services (16%), and consumer cyclical (12%). The net expense ratio is 0.82% (gross 0.97%, with waiver through September 30, 2026), and it features exceptional liquidity with over 68 million average daily shares traded and a 0.02% median bid-ask spread. Daily rebalancing maintains leverage, making it ideal for short-term tactical trades but prone to compounding effects over longer horizons.

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) Overview

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) aims to deliver three times (3x) the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index, comprising roughly 2,000 small-cap U.S. stocks with an average market cap around $1.7 billion. Introduced in 2010, this fund uses swaps, futures, and financial instruments to achieve exposure, mirroring the index's broad diversification across nearly 1,940 holdings. Top index components include names like Bloom Energy Corp. and Fabrinet, with no single holding exceeding 1% for high diversification. Sector weights feature industrials (18%), technology (17%), healthcare (16%), and financial services (16%), reflecting small-cap cyclicality. The net expense ratio stands at 0.95% (gross 1.08%), with quarterly distributions and options availability. Liquidity is solid at ~842,000 average daily volume and 0.05% bid-ask spread, though lower than peers. Like TQQQ, daily resets amplify volatility, positioning it for short-term plays on small-cap momentum.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The broader equity landscape pits large-cap technology against small-cap cyclicals amid a "Great Rotation" in 2026. The Nasdaq-100, powering TQQQ, benefits from AI-driven growth in mega-caps but faces valuation pressures and profit-taking after multi-year rallies. Conversely, the Russell 2000, underlying URTY, thrives on domestic revenue exposure, lower interest rate sensitivity post-Fed pauses, and capital flows into undervalued names trading at ~18x forward P/E versus Nasdaq's premium multiples. Macro drivers like stable growth, low unemployment, and potential deregulation favor small caps' higher beta to economic cycles. Sector risks include tech's vulnerability to geopolitical tensions and capex demands, while small caps grapple with limited resources amid inflation or slowdowns. Recent capital rotations underscore small-cap resilience, with regulatory stability and earnings breadth supporting diversified exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, URTY has shown relative outperformance over TQQQ during small-cap rotations, amplified by 3x leverage amid rallies in rate-sensitive sectors like financials and industrials. Year-to-date, both delivered strong gains—TQQQ around 45%, URTY near 43%—but URTY captured upside from earnings cycles in cyclicals and sector breadth beyond tech. TQQQ excelled in prior tech-led cycles, magnifying Nasdaq momentum from NVDA and peers, yet exhibited deeper drawdowns in corrections due to concentration. Volatility profiles differ: TQQQ's ~50% annualized volatility ties to mega-cap swings and interest rate expectations, while URTY's higher beta reflects small-cap sensitivity to macro shifts and commodity trends. Relative positioning favors URTY in risk-on expansions, with both prone to decay from daily resets; tactical use aligns with sector momentum rather than buy-and-hold.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using customizable criteria. It scans based on technical patterns like breakouts and trends, fundamentals such as market cap and earnings growth, volatility metrics, and AI-generated signals for momentum or value opportunities. Users can target specific industries, price patterns, performance benchmarks, or combine filters for precise trade ideas—identifying breakout candidates, undervalued sectors, or high-conviction ETFs more efficiently than manual methods. Ideal for ETF comparison and market scanning, the screener streamlines discovery in dynamic environments. Explore it today to uncover hidden opportunities tailored to your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors URTY due to its alignment with ongoing small-cap momentum, superior diversification across cyclicals, and relative trend strength in recent rotations. While TQQQ offers cost efficiency and unmatched liquidity with a robust tech profile, URTY's broader exposure and capture of sector breadth provide probabilistic edge amid macro tailwinds. This assessment weighs observable factors like volatility-adjusted positioning (volatility drag from assets under management (AUM, total assets managed by the fund)), but outcomes remain uncertain given leverage risks.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
TQQQ vs. URTY commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TQQQ is a Hold and URTY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TQQQ has more net assets: 39.7B vs. URTY (378M). URTY has a higher annual dividend yield than TQQQ: URTY (61.683) vs TQQQ (56.896). TQQQ was incepted earlier than URTY: TQQQ (16 years) vs URTY (16 years). TQQQ (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than URTY (0.95). URTY has a higher turnover TQQQ (25.00) vs TQQQ (25.00).
TQQQURTYTQQQ / URTY
Gain YTD56.89661.68392%
Net Assets39.7B378M10,503%
Total Expense Ratio0.820.9586%
Turnover25.0091.0027%
Yield0.370.6260%
Fund Existence16 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TQQQURTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
URTY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSCX104.111.09
+1.06%
Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OSCR ETF
PDBA35.530.01
+0.03%
Invesco Agriculture Cmdty Str No K-1ETF
CPSO27.83N/A
N/A
Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Oct
SJNK25.03-0.01
-0.04%
State Street® SPDR® Blmbg ST HY Bd ETF
NUAG20.94-0.05
-0.24%
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggt Bd ETF

TQQQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TQQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TQQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TQQQ
1D Price
Change %
TQQQ100%
-0.35%
LRCX - TQQQ
73%
Closely correlated
+5.27%
NVDA - TQQQ
70%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
KLAC - TQQQ
68%
Closely correlated
+3.70%
AMAT - TQQQ
67%
Closely correlated
+3.74%
ASML - TQQQ
66%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
More

URTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that URTY and SMCI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URTY and SMCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To URTY
1D Price
Change %
URTY100%
+2.70%
SMCI - URTY
31%
Poorly correlated
+15.66%