In the current market environment, TQQQ and URTY represent high-octane leveraged strategies for investors seeking amplified exposure to distinct equity segments. TQQQ triples the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index, dominated by technology mega-caps, while URTY leverages the Russell 2000 Index of small-cap stocks. Though not direct competitors, they offer alternative paths to equity upside: TQQQ for growth-oriented tech bets, URTY for cyclical small-cap plays. Amid ongoing sector rotation from large-cap tech to undervalued small caps, driven by interest rate dynamics and economic resilience, this ETF comparison highlights their structural differences, risk profiles, and positioning for tactical allocation in volatile conditions.
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times (3x) the Nasdaq-100 Index, a benchmark of 101 large non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq, heavily weighted toward technology leaders. Launched in 2010, this leveraged ETF employs derivatives such as swaps and futures contracts, alongside direct equity holdings and cash equivalents like money market ETFs for collateral. It holds approximately 122 securities, with top exposures including NVDA (~3.5%), AAPL (~2.9%), MSFT (~2.2%), and AMZN (~2.1%). Sector allocation emphasizes technology (54%), communication services (16%), and consumer cyclical (12%). The net expense ratio is 0.82% (gross 0.97%, with waiver through September 30, 2026), and it features exceptional liquidity with over 68 million average daily shares traded and a 0.02% median bid-ask spread. Daily rebalancing maintains leverage, making it ideal for short-term tactical trades but prone to compounding effects over longer horizons.
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) aims to deliver three times (3x) the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index, comprising roughly 2,000 small-cap U.S. stocks with an average market cap around $1.7 billion. Introduced in 2010, this fund uses swaps, futures, and financial instruments to achieve exposure, mirroring the index's broad diversification across nearly 1,940 holdings. Top index components include names like Bloom Energy Corp. and Fabrinet, with no single holding exceeding 1% for high diversification. Sector weights feature industrials (18%), technology (17%), healthcare (16%), and financial services (16%), reflecting small-cap cyclicality. The net expense ratio stands at 0.95% (gross 1.08%), with quarterly distributions and options availability. Liquidity is solid at ~842,000 average daily volume and 0.05% bid-ask spread, though lower than peers. Like TQQQ, daily resets amplify volatility, positioning it for short-term plays on small-cap momentum.
The broader equity landscape pits large-cap technology against small-cap cyclicals amid a "Great Rotation" in 2026. The Nasdaq-100, powering TQQQ, benefits from AI-driven growth in mega-caps but faces valuation pressures and profit-taking after multi-year rallies. Conversely, the Russell 2000, underlying URTY, thrives on domestic revenue exposure, lower interest rate sensitivity post-Fed pauses, and capital flows into undervalued names trading at ~18x forward P/E versus Nasdaq's premium multiples. Macro drivers like stable growth, low unemployment, and potential deregulation favor small caps' higher beta to economic cycles. Sector risks include tech's vulnerability to geopolitical tensions and capex demands, while small caps grapple with limited resources amid inflation or slowdowns. Recent capital rotations underscore small-cap resilience, with regulatory stability and earnings breadth supporting diversified exposure.
In recent months, URTY has shown relative outperformance over TQQQ during small-cap rotations, amplified by 3x leverage amid rallies in rate-sensitive sectors like financials and industrials. Year-to-date, both delivered strong gains—TQQQ around 45%, URTY near 43%—but URTY captured upside from earnings cycles in cyclicals and sector breadth beyond tech. TQQQ excelled in prior tech-led cycles, magnifying Nasdaq momentum from NVDA and peers, yet exhibited deeper drawdowns in corrections due to concentration. Volatility profiles differ: TQQQ's ~50% annualized volatility ties to mega-cap swings and interest rate expectations, while URTY's higher beta reflects small-cap sensitivity to macro shifts and commodity trends. Relative positioning favors URTY in risk-on expansions, with both prone to decay from daily resets; tactical use aligns with sector momentum rather than buy-and-hold.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using customizable criteria. It scans based on technical patterns like breakouts and trends, fundamentals such as market cap and earnings growth, volatility metrics, and AI-generated signals for momentum or value opportunities. Users can target specific industries, price patterns, performance benchmarks, or combine filters for precise trade ideas—identifying breakout candidates, undervalued sectors, or high-conviction ETFs more efficiently than manual methods. Ideal for ETF comparison and market scanning, the screener streamlines discovery in dynamic environments. Explore it today to uncover hidden opportunities tailored to your strategy.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors URTY due to its alignment with ongoing small-cap momentum, superior diversification across cyclicals, and relative trend strength in recent rotations. While TQQQ offers cost efficiency and unmatched liquidity with a robust tech profile, URTY's broader exposure and capture of sector breadth provide probabilistic edge amid macro tailwinds. This assessment weighs observable factors like volatility-adjusted positioning (volatility drag from assets under management (AUM, total assets managed by the fund)), but outcomes remain uncertain given leverage risks.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| TQQQ | URTY | TQQQ / URTY | |
| Gain YTD | 56.896 | 61.683 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 39.7B | 378M | 10,503% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.95 | 86% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 91.00 | 27% |
| Yield | 0.37 | 0.62 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| TQQQ | URTY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OSCX | 104.11 | 1.09 | +1.06% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OSCR ETF | |||
| PDBA | 35.53 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Invesco Agriculture Cmdty Str No K-1ETF | |||
| CPSO | 27.83 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Oct | |||
| SJNK | 25.03 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| State Street® SPDR® Blmbg ST HY Bd ETF | |||
| NUAG | 20.94 | -0.05 | -0.24% |
| Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggt Bd ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TQQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TQQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TQQQ | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| LRCX - TQQQ | 73% Closely correlated | +5.27% | ||
| NVDA - TQQQ | 70% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| KLAC - TQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| AMAT - TQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | +3.74% | ||
| ASML - TQQQ | 66% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that URTY and SMCI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URTY and SMCI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To URTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| URTY | 100% | +2.70% | ||
| SMCI - URTY | 31% Poorly correlated | +15.66% |