Ad is loading...
TQQQ vs UWM
TQQQ vs UWM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TQQQ vs. UWM commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TQQQ is a Hold and UWM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TQQQ has more net assets: 16.1B vs. UWM (243M). UWM has a higher annual dividend yield than TQQQ: UWM (-28.919) vs TQQQ (-33.319). TQQQ was incepted earlier than UWM: TQQQ (15 years) vs UWM (18 years). TQQQ (0.84) has a lower expense ratio than UWM (0.95). TQQQ has a higher turnover UWM (40.00) vs UWM (40.00).
| TQQQ | UWM | TQQQ / UWM | |
| Gain YTD | -33.319 | -28.919 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 16.1B | 243M | 6,626% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Turnover | 168.00 | 40.00 | 420% |
| Yield | 1.72 | 1.52 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| TQQQ | UWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 25 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TQQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TQQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TQQQ | 100% | +35.24% | ||
| LRCX - TQQQ | 80% Closely correlated | +18.02% | ||
| CDNS - TQQQ | 80% Closely correlated | +14.25% | ||
| KLAC - TQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +17.31% | ||
| SNPS - TQQQ | 78% Closely correlated | +12.35% | ||
| AMAT - TQQQ | 77% Closely correlated | +16.11% | ||
More | ||||
UWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UWM has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UWM jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UWM | 100% | +17.08% | ||
| FIX - UWM | 46% Loosely correlated | +14.27% | ||
| ONTO - UWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +26.30% | ||
| SMCI - UWM | 30% Poorly correlated | +15.64% | ||
| ELF - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | +9.29% | ||
| MSTR - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | +24.76% |