TRFM
Price
$62.05
Change
-$0.81 (-1.29%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
223.17M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLK
Price
$196.25
Change
-$1.96 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
129.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TRFM vs XLK

Header iconTRFM vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts TRFM vs XLKBanner chart's image
TRFM vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) vs. State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK)

Key Takeaways

  • AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) employs a rules-based, modified equal-weighted strategy focused on companies driving technological innovation and consumer behavior shifts, screened by research and development spending, resulting in broader diversification across approximately 262 holdings.
  • State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) tracks the Technology Select Sector Index, offering concentrated exposure to leading technology firms with roughly 73 holdings and heavy weighting toward mega-cap names such as NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corporation.
  • TRFM carries a higher expense ratio of 0.49% compared to XLK’s 0.08%, reflecting its thematic screening process versus XLK’s passive sector replication.
  • Both ETFs provide technology sector exposure but differ in approach: TRFM emphasizes innovation themes with equal-weighting elements, while XLK delivers broad, market-cap-weighted technology sector representation.
  • XLK benefits from superior liquidity and lower costs, suiting core technology allocations, whereas TRFM targets investors seeking differentiated exposure to transformative companies within the same sector.
  • Structural differences in holdings concentration and rebalancing create distinct risk profiles, with TRFM offering potentially higher volatility due to its thematic focus and XLK reflecting established sector leaders.

Introduction

Investors comparing technology-focused exchange-traded funds often evaluate AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) for complementary yet distinct exposure within the technology sector. These ETFs do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they represent alternative strategies targeting similar investor goals of participating in technological advancement. TRFM applies thematic screening for transformative potential, while XLK provides straightforward sector representation. The comparison highlights how structural differences influence diversification, costs, and positioning amid ongoing innovation cycles and sector dynamics.

AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) Overview

AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) is a passively managed, rules-based exchange-traded fund that tracks a modified equal-weighted index of U.S.-listed companies positioned to transform consumer behavior and technological innovation. The index screens constituents for elevated research and development (R&D) expenditures. The fund holds approximately 262 securities, with the top 10 holdings representing about 10-12% of assets, promoting broader diversification than typical concentrated peers. Top holdings often include technology names such as Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Micron Technology Inc., and similar innovators. Sector allocation centers on technology but extends into related areas tied to innovation themes. TRFM maintains an expense ratio of 0.49%. It features periodic rebalancing to maintain equal-weighting characteristics within its rules-based framework. The fund launched in 2022 and emphasizes structural exposure to high-R&D companies rather than broad market-cap weighting.

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) Overview

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index, a subset of the S&P 500 Index focused on technology companies. It holds approximately 73 securities, with significant concentration in the largest constituents. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Micron Technology Inc., which can account for a substantial portion of assets. Sector allocation is overwhelmingly technology at nearly 99%, with minor exposure to communication services. XLK features a low expense ratio of 0.08%. As a market-cap-weighted fund, it rebalances in line with index methodology to reflect changes in constituent weights. The fund, launched in 1998, provides established, liquid exposure to the technology sector through a transparent, rules-based structure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from sustained demand for semiconductors, software, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence applications, supported by corporate capital expenditures and innovation cycles. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories and global supply chain developments influence capital allocation within the sector. Regulatory scrutiny around data privacy, antitrust matters, and export controls represents ongoing considerations for technology firms. Capital flows into technology-related products remain robust as investors seek growth exposure amid broader economic shifts. Both ETFs operate within this environment, though TRFM’s emphasis on R&D-intensive transformers aligns with companies driving next-generation advancements, while XLK captures the established leaders benefiting from scale and market dominance.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, XLK has demonstrated strong alignment with mega-cap technology performance due to its concentrated holdings in high-growth leaders, often exhibiting lower relative volatility within the sector compared to more thematic approaches. TRFM, with its modified equal-weighting and broader holdings across R&D-focused innovators, has shown positioning that can capture upside from emerging transformers while potentially experiencing different sensitivity to sector rotations. During periods of earnings strength among semiconductor and software companies, both have benefited, but XLK’s market-cap weighting amplifies gains from the largest names. TRFM’s thematic screening supports exposure to companies with consistent innovation pipelines, offering a complementary profile for investors seeking diversified technology participation beyond pure sector replication. Relative positioning highlights XLK’s efficiency for core allocations and TRFM’s role in thematic tilts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, higher liquidity, established sector representation, and consistent alignment with technology momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of structural favorability to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) for most investors seeking efficient technology exposure. TRFM offers differentiated thematic characteristics that may appeal in specific innovation-focused portfolios, though its higher costs and narrower investor base introduce relative considerations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
TRFM vs. XLK commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRFM is a Buy and XLK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 129B vs. TRFM (223M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than TRFM: XLK (36.468) vs TRFM (30.304). TRFM was incepted earlier than XLK: TRFM (4 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than TRFM (0.49). TRFM has a higher turnover XLK (5.00) vs XLK (5.00).
TRFMXLKTRFM / XLK
Gain YTD30.30436.46883%
Net Assets223M129B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.490.08613%
Turnover79.005.001,580%
Yield0.130.4033%
Fund Existence4 years27 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TRFMXLK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TRFM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRPZ29.58N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF
HYGH86.27-0.08
-0.09%
iShares Interest Rate Hdg Hi Yld Bd ETF
TCPB50.60-0.13
-0.25%
Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF
MCHI55.98-1.21
-2.12%
iShares MSCI China ETF
KARS35.50-1.22
-3.32%
KraneShares Eltc Vhl and Ft Mbly ETF

TRFM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRFM has been loosely correlated with SABR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRFM jumps, then SABR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRFM
1D Price
Change %
TRFM100%
-1.23%
SABR - TRFM
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
CD - TRFM
32%
Poorly correlated
-11.41%
GTM - TRFM
16%
Poorly correlated
-9.05%
PINS - TRFM
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
RIOT - TRFM
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
More

XLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLK
1D Price
Change %
XLK100%
-1.00%
NOW - XLK
97%
Closely correlated
-7.64%
QRVO - XLK
69%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
MA - XLK
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
V - XLK
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
BR - XLK
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
More