TRPCF
Price
$72.22
Change
+$7.51 (+11.61%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
47.92B
WW
Price
$30.33
Change
-$1.64 (-5.13%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
302.9M
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

TRPCF vs WW

Header iconTRPCF vs WW Comparison
Open Charts TRPCF vs WWBanner chart's image
Trip.com Group
Price$72.22
Change+$7.51 (+11.61%)
Volume$179
Capitalization47.92B
WW International
Price$30.33
Change-$1.64 (-5.13%)
Volume$202.22K
Capitalization302.9M
TRPCF vs WW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TRPCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TRPCF vs. WW commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRPCF is a Buy and WW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (TRPCF: $72.22 vs. WW: $30.33)
Brand notoriety: TRPCF: Not notable vs. WW: Notable
TRPCF represents the Consumer Sundries, while WW is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TRPCF: 49% vs. WW: 63%
Market capitalization -- TRPCF: $47.92B vs. WW: $302.9M
TRPCF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $47.92B. WW’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $302.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $178.44B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.29B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TRPCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TRPCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both TRPCF and WW are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TRPCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TRPCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

TRPCF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WW (@Personnel Services) price change was -4.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +9.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -6.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +216.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

WW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+9.70% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (-6.56% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRPCF($47.9B) has a higher market cap than WW($303M). TRPCF has higher P/E ratio than WW: TRPCF (19.92) vs WW (2.36). WW YTD gains are higher at: 2288.189 vs. TRPCF (35.828). TRPCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.4B vs. WW (1.15B). TRPCF has more cash in the bank: 78.1B vs. WW (152M). WW has less debt than TRPCF: WW (477M) vs TRPCF (42.8B). TRPCF has higher revenues than WW: TRPCF (55.2B) vs WW (741M).
TRPCFWWTRPCF / WW
Capitalization47.9B303M15,809%
EBITDA19.4B1.15B1,681%
Gain YTD35.8282288.1892%
P/E Ratio19.922.36844%
Revenue55.2B741M7,449%
Total Cash78.1B152M51,382%
Total Debt42.8B477M8,973%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WW: Fundamental Ratings
WW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TRPCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TRPCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVOG120.230.47
+0.39%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
BWEB73.150.12
+0.17%
Bitwise Web3 ETF
STOT47.420.05
+0.11%
SPDR® DoubleLine Shrt Dur Ttl RetTactETF
TJAN26.80-0.02
-0.06%
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to January 2027
JPMO16.63-0.44
-2.58%
YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF

TRPCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRPCF and ROL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRPCF and ROL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRPCF
1D Price
Change %
TRPCF100%
N/A
ROL - TRPCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
WW - TRPCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.13%
ABNB - TRPCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
EM - TRPCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
MRM - TRPCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+13.89%
More