URA
Price
$43.94
Change
-$1.57 (-3.45%)
Updated
Sep 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
6.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
URNM
Price
$54.57
Change
-$2.24 (-3.94%)
Updated
Sep 1, 04:21 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

URA vs URNM

URA vs URNM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Uranium ETF (URA) vs. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM)

Key Takeaways

  • Global X Uranium ETF (URA) offers broader exposure across the uranium value chain, including nuclear components and technology companies, while Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) concentrates on pure-play uranium miners and physical uranium holdings.
  • URA tracks the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index with approximately 55–58 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.69%, providing greater diversification than URNM.
  • URNM tracks the VettaFi Global Uranium Mining Index with roughly 25–30 holdings, an expense ratio of 0.75%, and higher concentration in mining operations and physical uranium trusts.
  • Both ETFs are passive, non-diversified thematic vehicles targeting the uranium and nuclear energy sector, with overlapping top holdings such as Cameco Corp but differing emphasis on downstream nuclear activities versus upstream mining.
  • URA typically exhibits lower concentration risk due to its inclusion of nuclear equipment and reactor-related firms, whereas URNM delivers more direct exposure to uranium production and exploration companies.
  • Structural differences in index methodology lead to distinct risk profiles, with URA capturing a wider array of nuclear supply-chain participants and URNM focusing more narrowly on mining-centric equities.

Introduction

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) both provide targeted access to the uranium sector amid growing interest in nuclear energy for decarbonization and energy security. These ETFs do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they represent alternative strategies within the same thematic space. URA delivers exposure across the broader uranium and nuclear components ecosystem, while URNM emphasizes pure-play mining and physical uranium assets. Investors comparing the two seek to understand differences in diversification, cost, and positioning within the uranium supply chain to align with specific portfolio objectives.

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) Overview

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is a passive thematic ETF that seeks to track the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of companies involved in the uranium industry, including mining, exploration, and nuclear components manufacturing. It holds approximately 55–58 securities, with top positions including Cameco Corp, Oklo Inc, NexGen Energy Ltd, Uranium Energy Corp, and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust. Sector allocations emphasize energy and industrials, reflecting exposure to both mining and nuclear technology firms. The expense ratio stands at 0.69%. As a non-diversified, rules-based passive vehicle, URA rebalances according to its underlying index methodology and offers semi-annual distributions.

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Overview

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) is a passive thematic ETF designed to track the VettaFi Global Uranium Mining Index. The fund allocates at least 80% of assets to companies devoting a substantial portion of their business to uranium mining, exploration, development, production, or holding physical uranium and related royalties. It maintains roughly 25–30 holdings, with significant positions in Cameco Corp, Sprott Physical Uranium Trust, NexGen Energy Ltd, Denison Mines Corp, and Energy Fuels Inc. The portfolio focuses predominantly on the energy sector. URNM carries an expense ratio of 0.75%. This non-diversified, rules-based passive ETF follows a market-cap-weighted index with quarterly rebalancing elements and distributes dividends annually.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The uranium sector operates within the broader nuclear energy theme, driven by increasing global demand for low-carbon baseload power, energy security concerns, and expanding reactor construction worldwide. Key catalysts include policy support for nuclear power in multiple regions, rising electricity needs from data centers and industrial electrification, and supply constraints from limited new mine development. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate environments and commodity price cycles influence capital flows into mining and nuclear equities. Sector risks encompass regulatory hurdles, geopolitical tensions affecting key producers, and long lead times for mine development. Both ETFs position investors for potential growth in uranium demand tied to the nuclear renaissance, though exposure differences shape sensitivity to specific supply-chain segments.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the two ETFs have displayed correlated movements driven by uranium price trends and sector sentiment, yet relative positioning reveals distinctions. Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has benefited from its broader inclusion of nuclear technology and components firms, potentially moderating volatility during periods of mining-specific fluctuations. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM), with its heavier weighting toward pure miners and physical uranium, has shown greater sensitivity to upstream production developments and commodity price swings. Over broader timeframes, differences in holdings concentration and sector breadth contribute to varying responses to interest rate shifts, earnings cycles among top constituents, and geopolitical events impacting supply. URA generally offers a more balanced risk profile across the value chain, while URNM provides amplified exposure to mining dynamics.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs like those in the uranium sector may find the platform useful for refining screening criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the nuclear value chain, and inclusion of components and technology holdings support a more balanced exposure profile relative to Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). URNM’s higher concentration in mining equities and elevated fee may appeal to investors seeking amplified pure-play exposure, yet URA’s cost efficiency and reduced single-segment risk tilt the structural comparison in its favor under current thematic conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
URA vs. URNM commentary
Sep 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is URA is a Hold and URNM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
URA has more net assets: 6.42B vs. URNM (2.22B). URA has a higher annual dividend yield than URNM: URA (6.506) vs URNM (3.498). URA was incepted earlier than URNM: URA (16 years) vs URNM (7 years). URA (0.69) has a lower expense ratio than URNM (0.75). URNM has a higher turnover URA (14.51) vs URA (14.51).
URAURNMURA / URNM
Gain YTD6.5063.498186%
Net Assets6.42B2.22B289%
Total Expense Ratio0.690.7592%
Turnover14.5135.0041%
Yield4.573.58128%
Fund Existence16 years7 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
URAURNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
URA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
URNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSMT22.91N/A
N/A
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Muncpl Bd ETF
RSMR24.26N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March
AVNV87.24-0.05
-0.05%
Avantis All International Mkts Val ETF
SEA19.70-0.06
-0.30%
US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
IWMI51.87-0.25
-0.47%
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF