It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
WDS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWOPEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
WDS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOPEF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +3.94% price change this week, while WOPEF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +5.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.99%.
WDS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
WDS | WOPEF | WDS / WOPEF | |
Capitalization | 37.8B | 48.3B | 78% |
EBITDA | 7.67B | 12.3B | 62% |
Gain YTD | -16.681 | -17.848 | 93% |
P/E Ratio | 23.00 | 5.96 | 386% |
Revenue | 14B | 16.8B | 83% |
Total Cash | 1.95B | 6.87B | 28% |
Total Debt | 6.5B | 6.77B | 96% |
WDS | WOPEF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WDS's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as WOPEF (20). This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to WOPEF’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WOPEF (100). This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to WOPEF’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as WOPEF (94). This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to WOPEF’s over the last 12 months.
WOPEF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as WDS (60). This means that WOPEF’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WOPEF (90). This means that WDS’s stock grew significantly faster than WOPEF’s over the last 12 months.
WDS | WOPEF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago55% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago54% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago54% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago69% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with OXY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then OXY could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WOPEF has been loosely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WOPEF jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WOPEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WOPEF | 100% | +0.05% | ||
WDS - WOPEF | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
SSLZY - WOPEF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
SOUTF - WOPEF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
UNRG - WOPEF | 21% Poorly correlated | -5.50% | ||
PED - WOPEF | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
More |