This comparison examines three prominent precious metals companies: AEM, a leading gold producer; PAAS, a major silver and gold miner; and WPM, a precious metals streaming firm. These stocks offer exposure to gold and silver amid sustained high metal prices driven by geopolitical tensions and inflation hedges. Investors seeking sector diversification, momentum plays, or hedges against market volatility may find value in analyzing their relative performance, business models, and recent developments. Traders focused on basic materials can assess trade-offs in risk, growth, and valuation sensitivity in the current environment.
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is a senior gold producer with operations in Canada, Australia, Finland, and Mexico. The company focuses on exploration, development, and production of precious metals. In recent market activity, AEM shares have shown resilience, posting solid YTD gains despite short-term pullbacks. Key influences include a Q1 earnings beat with record net income, strategic expansions in Finland, and shareholder approvals at the annual meeting. Elevated gold prices have supported sentiment, though operational costs and metal price fluctuations contribute to volatility. With a market cap near $92 billion and low beta, AEM reflects strong positioning in a bullish gold market.
Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) operates silver and gold mines across the Americas, including key assets like La Colorada and Jacobina. It emphasizes exploration and production of silver, gold, zinc, lead, and copper. Recent weeks have seen PAAS underperform peers amid sector dips, with modest YTD returns. Developments include annual meeting results, positive analyst price target hikes to $65, and growth prospects from the MAG Silver deal and La Colorada discoveries. Silver price strength aids sentiment, but higher beta signals greater market sensitivity. Trading around $52 with a $22 billion market cap, PAAS balances diversified output with exploration upside.
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) is a streaming company providing upfront capital to miners in exchange for future metal purchases at fixed prices, targeting gold, silver, and others globally. In recent market activity, WPM has delivered mid-tier YTD gains, with shares pulling back less severely than miners. Portfolio expansions, such as the Spanish Mountain gold stream, have boosted outlook ahead of earnings. Strong 1-year returns reflect leverage to rising metals without mining risks. At a $57 billion market cap and elevated P/E, WPM appeals for its balance sheet strength and dividend.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI-powered trading bots out of over 350 available, curated for current market conditions across sectors like semiconductors, energy, and precious metals. These bots deliver real-time signals for copy trading, with virtual agents offering risk management and signal agents requiring no minimum balance. Performance stats impress: annualized returns from 24% to 163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Precious metals bots trade gold, silver, and copper miners (9-18 tickers each), using strategies like trend following and leveraged ETFs. With diverse timeframes and styles, they help traders adapt to volatility. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to your strategy.
AEM and PAAS operate traditional mining models exposed to production costs and jurisdictional risks, contrasting WPM's asset-light streaming approach that minimizes capex but caps upside. Growth drivers include AEM's expansions and PAAS's silver discoveries, versus WPM's deal pipeline. Recent momentum favors AEM post-earnings, while all benefit from gold rallies. Risks: higher for high-beta PAAS amid silver volatility; WPM sensitive to counterparty production. Valuations show AEM cheapest on P/E, with sector exposure tilted gold for AEM/WPM versus silver for PAAS. Sentiment remains positive across analyst upgrades.
Tickeron's AI currently favors AEM due to superior trend consistency, lower volatility (beta 0.57), recent earnings catalysts, and attractive valuation. Its relative YTD strength and production stability position it well probabilistically in a gold-favoring environment, though WPM offers risk-adjusted appeal for streamers.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and WPM’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and WPM’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.18% , and WPM (@Precious Metals) price fluctuated -0.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.09%.
AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
WPM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AEM | PAAS | WPM | |
| Capitalization | 81.4B | 20.3B | 52.8B |
| EBITDA | 9.74B | 2.22B | 2.4B |
| Gain YTD | -3.656 | -6.535 | -0.904 |
| P/E Ratio | 15.31 | 15.19 | 29.34 |
| Revenue | 13.5B | 4B | 2.75B |
| Total Cash | 3.12B | 1.61B | 2.17B |
| Total Debt | 319M | 845M | 7.66M |
AEM | PAAS | WPM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 51 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 59 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 45 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 61 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 95 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (35) in the Precious Metals industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (93) in the null industry. This means that PAAS's stock grew similarly to WPM’s and significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
WPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (49) in the null industry, and is in the same range as PAAS (59) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that WPM's stock grew similarly to AEM’s and similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as WPM (44) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as PAAS (45) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM's stock grew similarly to WPM’s and similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (62) in the null industry, and is in the same range as WPM (62) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PAAS's stock grew similarly to AEM’s and similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (95) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as WPM (95) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM's stock grew similarly to PAAS’s and similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | PAAS | WPM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 56% |