AFRM
Price
$65.82
Change
-$1.75 (-2.59%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
22.04B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CLSK
Price
$13.11
Change
-$0.87 (-6.22%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.37B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
COIN
Price
$195.43
Change
-$16.58 (-7.82%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
51.49B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM or CLSK or COIN

Header iconAFRM vs CLSK vs COIN Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs CLSK vs COINBanner chart's image
AFRM vs CLSK vs COIN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Affirm Holdings (AFRM) vs. CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Coinbase (COIN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AFRM has surged about 46% over the past month, leading in recent momentum amid earnings anticipation.
  • CLSK posted a comparable 47% one-month gain, fueled by Bitcoin mining growth and a pivot toward AI infrastructure.
  • COIN rallied recently on stablecoin regulatory progress, though its monthly gains trail the others at around 4-5%.
  • All three stocks show high betas above 3.3, reflecting elevated volatility tied to fintech and crypto exposures.
  • Year-to-date, CLSK leads at 25%, followed by AFRM and COIN near 10%.
  • Market caps differ sharply: COIN at $54B, AFRM $22B, CLSK $3B.

Introduction

This comparison examines AFRM, CLSK, and COIN, three high-growth stocks blending fintech innovation and cryptocurrency influences. Affirm focuses on buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) services, CleanSpark on Bitcoin mining with AI ambitions, and Coinbase on crypto trading. Traders eyeing momentum plays or sector rotations in volatile markets, as well as investors tracking digital finance trends, will find value in their relative performance, risks, and catalysts. Recent market activity highlights shifts in sentiment driven by regulatory news, expansions, and earnings outlooks.

AFRM Overview and Recent Performance

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) operates a BNPL platform enabling flexible consumer financing at checkout. In recent market activity, the stock has climbed roughly 46% over the past month, outpacing broader indices, supported by promotional campaigns like "The Big Nothing" 0% APR offer and partnerships. Trading near $67 with a market cap of $22B, it carries a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 82.5 and positive EPS of $0.81. High beta (3.72) underscores volatility, but analyst targets average $79, with buys amid Q3 earnings due May 7 projecting sharp EPS growth. Sentiment has shifted positively on valuation resets and expanding merchant ties, though EPS estimates dipped slightly recently.

CLSK Overview and Recent Performance

CleanSpark (CLSK) specializes in Bitcoin mining using sustainable energy, increasingly pivoting to AI and high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructure. The stock gained about 47% in the past month amid operational expansions in Texas and hyperscaler talks, trading around $13 with a $3.3B market cap. Lacking a P/E due to negative EPS (-$1.06), it boasts YTD gains of 25% but faces margin pressures from Bitcoin sales and energy costs. Beta mirrors peers at 3.72. Analysts like Needham raised targets to $18 (Buy), citing AI potential, though Q1 results showed losses. Recent dips reflect broader miner challenges, balanced by efficiency narratives.

COIN Overview and Recent Performance

Coinbase Global (COIN) runs the leading U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, earning from trading fees and custody. Recent weeks saw gains from stablecoin yield rule progress, pushing shares above $200 (up 7% intraday) with a $54B market cap—the largest here. P/E stands at 46 with EPS $4.46; YTD up 9.5%, beta 3.38. Analyst targets average $235, with Overweight calls on regulatory tailwinds, though trading volumes pressure estimates. Sentiment benefits from Bitcoin's rise and legislative clarity, offsetting prior declines, positioning it as a crypto proxy with scale advantages.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page spotlights 25 elite performers from its library of 351 AI trading bots, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These curated bots rise to the top based on AI analysis of their handling of current market volatility, showcasing diverse strategies like trend-following agents, multi-agents, and corridor exits over timeframes from 5 minutes to 49 days. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +162%, win rates of 51-88%, profit factors to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 17. Examples: a 60-minute AI agent on USAR/SMR/CIFR boasts +162% annualized return (74% win rate); a tech-focused 15-minute bot hits +100% return. With hundreds of bots tailored to varying styles, performances, and conditions, this section highlights the most suitable for today's environment. Traders can explore these for potential edges in dynamic markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business models diverge: AFRM's consumer lending contrasts CLSK's energy-intensive mining/AI infra and COIN's fee-based exchange. Growth drivers tie CLSK and COIN to Bitcoin/crypto cycles, while AFRM leverages e-commerce. Recent momentum favors AFRM and CLSK over COIN's steadier but lower gains. Risks amplify for crypto-exposed CLSK/COIN via halvings, regulations, and volatility; AFRM faces credit cycles. Sector ties: fintech for all, but CLSK/COIN more direct crypto beta. Valuations show COIN's reasonable P/E, AFRM's premium on profitability, CLSK's negative earnings reflecting reinvestment. Sentiment leans positive across, with AFRM/CLSK on catalysts, COIN on policy—trade-offs pit AFRM's stability against CLSK's upside and COIN's scale.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI currently leans toward AFRM, given its consistent recent trend strength, positive analyst revisions, and near-term earnings catalyst positioning it favorably relative to peers' crypto dependencies and volatility. This probabilistic edge reflects observable momentum over definitive outperformance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 18, 2026
Stock price -- (AFRM: $65.82CLSK: $13.11COIN: $195.43)
Brand notoriety: AFRM, CLSK and COIN are all not notable
AFRM represents the Savings Banks industry, CLSK is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry, and COIN is in the Financial Publishing/Services industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 66%, CLSK: 87%, COIN: 134%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $22.04B, CLSK: $3.37B, COIN: $51.49B
AFRM [@Savings Banks] is valued at $22.04B. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.37B. COIN [@Financial Publishing/Services] has a market capitalization of $51.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $619.49B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $119.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $20.38B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.08B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $28.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and COIN’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • COIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM and COIN are a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and COIN’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • COIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COIN is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK, which in turn is a better option than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Savings Banks) experienced а +2.83% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -7.68% , and COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) price fluctuated -2.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.91%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.06%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

COIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.85% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (-3.15% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COIN($51.5B) has a higher market cap than AFRM($22B) and CLSK($3.37B). COIN has higher P/E ratio than AFRM and CLSK: COIN (71.85) vs AFRM (59.84) and CLSK (7.38). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 29.545 vs. AFRM (-11.568) and COIN (-13.580). COIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.29B vs. AFRM (1.12B) and CLSK (-69.3M). COIN has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. AFRM (2.48B) and CLSK (935M). CLSK has less debt than COIN and AFRM: CLSK (1.79B) vs COIN (7.96B) and AFRM (9.09B). COIN has higher revenues than AFRM and CLSK: COIN (6.56B) vs AFRM (3.97B) and CLSK (740M).
AFRMCLSKCOIN
Capitalization22B3.37B51.5B
EBITDA1.12B-69.3M1.29B
Gain YTD-11.56829.545-13.580
P/E Ratio59.847.3871.85
Revenue3.97B740M6.56B
Total Cash2.48B935M10.7B
Total Debt9.09B1.79B7.96B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMCLSKCOIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
COIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMN10.490.51
+5.09%
ProShares UltraShort Materials
SJLD25.47N/A
N/A
SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF
FDEM35.62-0.95
-2.60%
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
QQQU61.31-1.70
-2.70%
Direxion Daily Concentrated Qs Bull 2X Shares
PPA164.59-4.93
-2.91%
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-6.22%
MARA - CLSK
83%
Closely correlated
-6.40%
RIOT - CLSK
79%
Closely correlated
-4.59%
KEEL - CLSK
76%
Closely correlated
-4.77%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-5.11%
COIN - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-7.82%
More

COIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COIN has been closely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COIN jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COIN
1D Price
Change %
COIN100%
-7.82%
AFRM - COIN
81%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
MSTR - COIN
81%
Closely correlated
-5.11%
RIOT - COIN
77%
Closely correlated
-4.59%
U - COIN
74%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
HOOD - COIN
73%
Closely correlated
-4.41%
More