AMLP
Price
$52.37
Change
-$0.28 (-0.53%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Net Assets
12.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMI
Price
$59.20
Change
-$0.51 (-0.85%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Net Assets
525.94M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USAI
Price
$45.31
Change
-$0.37 (-0.81%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Net Assets
122.44M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMLP or UMI or USAI

AMLP vs UMI vs USAI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 23, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) vs. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) vs. Pacer American Energy Infrastructure ETF (USAI)

Key Takeaways

  • AMLP is a passive ETF tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index with approximately 16 holdings concentrated in midstream master limited partnerships (MLPs), featuring a higher expense ratio of 1.01%.
  • UMI is an actively managed ETF targeting high-quality U.S. and Canadian midstream energy companies with about 24 holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.69%, emphasizing income generation.
  • USAI is a passive ETF tracking the American Energy Infrastructure Index with roughly 35 holdings, allocating 80% to U.S. and Canadian midstream companies and 20% to MLPs, at an expense ratio of 0.75%.
  • All three ETFs provide exposure to the midstream energy infrastructure sector but differ in structure (passive vs. active), diversification depth, MLP concentration, and tax considerations.
  • AMLP offers the highest MLP exposure and potential tax complexity, while UMI and USAI provide broader or actively selected diversification with potentially simpler tax reporting.
  • Structural differences influence cost efficiency, concentration risk, and sensitivity to energy infrastructure cash flows and regulatory environments.

Introduction

These three ETFs target the midstream energy infrastructure theme, which encompasses the transportation, storage, and processing of oil, natural gas, and refined products. AMLP, UMI, and USAI compete within the same sector but employ distinct approaches: AMLP delivers pure-play MLP exposure through a passive index, UMI uses active management for income-focused selection, and USAI balances MLP and corporate structures in a rules-based passive framework. Investors compare them to assess trade-offs in cost, diversification, tax treatment, and alignment with midstream cash flow stability amid evolving energy markets.

Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) Overview

AMLP seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index before fees and expenses. The fund typically holds about 16 securities, with top holdings including Sunoco LP (SUN), MPLX LP (MPLX), Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD), Plains All American Pipeline LP (PAA), and Western Midstream Partners LP (WES). Sector allocation is heavily concentrated in energy infrastructure, primarily midstream MLPs. The expense ratio stands at 1.01%. As a passive, non-diversified ETF structured as a C-corporation, AMLP provides simplified 1099 tax reporting instead of K-1s but incurs corporate-level taxes. It rebalances according to the underlying index methodology and focuses exclusively on MLPs earning most cash flows from energy midstream activities.

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) Overview

UMI is an actively managed ETF seeking high current income with secondary capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of assets in U.S. and Canadian midstream energy companies. It typically holds 24 to 25 securities selected through bottom-up fundamental research on metrics such as distribution coverage, leverage, and contract quality. Top holdings often include Energy Transfer LP (ET), Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD), and Targa Resources Corp (TRGP). The expense ratio is 0.69%. The fund may allocate up to 25% to MLPs taxed as partnerships while favoring companies with persistent cash flows. Rebalancing occurs as needed based on the sub-adviser’s ongoing analysis rather than a fixed index schedule.

Pacer American Energy Infrastructure ETF (USAI) Overview

USAI seeks to track the American Energy Infrastructure Index before fees and expenses. The passive strategy maintains approximately 35 holdings, with an 80% allocation to U.S. and Canadian midstream companies (often C-corporations) and 20% to MLPs. Top holdings typically feature Cheniere Energy Inc. (LNG), Energy Transfer LP (ET), Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD), Williams Cos Inc. (WMB), and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). The expense ratio is 0.75%. By limiting MLP exposure below 25%, the fund maintains regulated investment company (RIC) status for potentially simpler tax treatment. The index rebalances quarterly using market-capitalization weighting within fixed categories.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The midstream energy infrastructure sector benefits from steady U.S. and Canadian production growth in oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, driving demand for pipelines, storage, and processing assets. Capital flows into the sector reflect infrastructure needs tied to export capacity, including liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities. Regulatory shifts around permitting, environmental standards, and tax policy for MLPs influence operations, while macroeconomic drivers such as energy prices, interest rates, and global supply dynamics affect cash flow stability. Earnings trends among major holdings remain supported by long-term contracts, though geopolitical events and shifts in energy transition policies introduce sector risks. All three ETFs operate within this environment of durable infrastructure demand offset by commodity and regulatory volatility.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, structural differences have contributed to varying behavior: AMLP’s high MLP concentration and C-corporation structure have led to distinct tax drag and sensitivity to MLP-specific distributions compared with the others. UMI’s active selection has emphasized income stability and potentially lower volatility through quality screens, while USAI’s balanced corporate-MLP mix has offered intermediate diversification. Relative positioning shows AMLP with deeper MLP exposure potentially amplifying cash flow yields but also concentration risk, UMI with active adjustments for momentum stability, and USAI with broader holdings reducing single-name risk. Performance differentials arise from expense ratios, rebalancing approaches, and varying degrees of direct commodity price exposure versus fee-based or contract-driven revenues.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking midstream energy infrastructure exposure can apply industry filters to compare ETFs like AMLP, UMI, and USAI alongside individual holdings.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural strength, diversification profile, cost efficiency, and risk-adjusted positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probability of favor to UMI. Its active management, lower expense ratio, and focus on high-quality midstream names with strong distribution coverage provide a balanced combination of income generation and reduced concentration risk relative to AMLP’s higher costs and MLP focus or USAI’s broader but passive allocation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for AMLP with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

AMLP's RSI Indicator recovers from oversold territory

The RSI Indicator for AMLP moved out of oversold territory on October 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 19 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 18 of the 19 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 45 of 49 cases where AMLP's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for AMLP just turned positive on October 16, 2026. Looking at past instances where AMLP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 44 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.

Following a +0.86% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AMLP advanced for three days, in 329 of 370 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.

AMLP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on AMLP as a result. In 61 of 81 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.

AMLP moved below its 50-day moving average on September 21, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for AMLP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 25, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 9 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AMLP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.

The Aroon Indicator for AMLP entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for UMI with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

UMI's RSI Oscillator recovers from oversold territory

The RSI Indicator for UMI moved out of oversold territory on October 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 16 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 16 of the 16 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on UMI as a result. In 82 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for UMI just turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where UMI's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 42 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

Following a +1.26% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where UMI advanced for three days, in 356 of 396 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.

The 10-day moving average for UMI crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where UMI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.

The Aroon Indicator for UMI entered a downward trend on October 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for USAI with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

USAI's RSI Indicator ascends from oversold territory

The RSI Oscillator for USAI moved out of oversold territory on October 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 18 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 18 of the 18 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on USAI as a result. In 81 of 88 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for USAI just turned positive on October 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where USAI's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 43 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Following a +0.60% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where USAI advanced for three days, in 336 of 375 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 51 of 67 cases where USAI's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.

The 10-day moving average for USAI crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where USAI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.

The Aroon Indicator for USAI entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMLPUMIUSAI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
AMLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USAI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMLP has been closely correlated with EPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMLP jumps, then EPD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMLP
1D Price
Change %
AMLP100%
-0.53%
EPD - AMLP
72%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
WES - AMLP
70%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
ET - AMLP
69%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
HESM - AMLP
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
CQP - AMLP
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
More

UMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMI has been closely correlated with KMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMI jumps, then KMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMI
1D Price
Change %
UMI100%
-0.85%
KMI - UMI
82%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
OKE - UMI
80%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
TRGP - UMI
80%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
WMB - UMI
77%
Closely correlated
-2.98%
AM - UMI
75%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
More

USAI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USAI has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USAI jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USAI
1D Price
Change %
USAI100%
-0.82%
OKE - USAI
81%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
KMI - USAI
79%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
TRGP - USAI
78%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
WMB - USAI
75%
Closely correlated
-2.98%
AM - USAI
75%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNUT2.950.07
+2.43%
Krispy Kreme
RCUS19.360.26
+1.36%
Arcus Biosciences
FBGL2.25-0.07
-3.02%
FBS Global Limited
SEIC104.50-3.93
-3.62%
SEI Investments Company
KULR1.59-0.16
-9.14%
KULR Technology Group Inc