These three ETFs target the midstream energy infrastructure theme, which encompasses the transportation, storage, and processing of oil, natural gas, and refined products. AMLP, UMI, and USAI compete within the same sector but employ distinct approaches: AMLP delivers pure-play MLP exposure through a passive index, UMI uses active management for income-focused selection, and USAI balances MLP and corporate structures in a rules-based passive framework. Investors compare them to assess trade-offs in cost, diversification, tax treatment, and alignment with midstream cash flow stability amid evolving energy markets.
AMLP seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index before fees and expenses. The fund typically holds about 16 securities, with top holdings including Sunoco LP (SUN), MPLX LP (MPLX), Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD), Plains All American Pipeline LP (PAA), and Western Midstream Partners LP (WES). Sector allocation is heavily concentrated in energy infrastructure, primarily midstream MLPs. The expense ratio stands at 1.01%. As a passive, non-diversified ETF structured as a C-corporation, AMLP provides simplified 1099 tax reporting instead of K-1s but incurs corporate-level taxes. It rebalances according to the underlying index methodology and focuses exclusively on MLPs earning most cash flows from energy midstream activities.
UMI is an actively managed ETF seeking high current income with secondary capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of assets in U.S. and Canadian midstream energy companies. It typically holds 24 to 25 securities selected through bottom-up fundamental research on metrics such as distribution coverage, leverage, and contract quality. Top holdings often include Energy Transfer LP (ET), Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD), and Targa Resources Corp (TRGP). The expense ratio is 0.69%. The fund may allocate up to 25% to MLPs taxed as partnerships while favoring companies with persistent cash flows. Rebalancing occurs as needed based on the sub-adviser’s ongoing analysis rather than a fixed index schedule.
USAI seeks to track the American Energy Infrastructure Index before fees and expenses. The passive strategy maintains approximately 35 holdings, with an 80% allocation to U.S. and Canadian midstream companies (often C-corporations) and 20% to MLPs. Top holdings typically feature Cheniere Energy Inc. (LNG), Energy Transfer LP (ET), Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD), Williams Cos Inc. (WMB), and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). The expense ratio is 0.75%. By limiting MLP exposure below 25%, the fund maintains regulated investment company (RIC) status for potentially simpler tax treatment. The index rebalances quarterly using market-capitalization weighting within fixed categories.
The midstream energy infrastructure sector benefits from steady U.S. and Canadian production growth in oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, driving demand for pipelines, storage, and processing assets. Capital flows into the sector reflect infrastructure needs tied to export capacity, including liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities. Regulatory shifts around permitting, environmental standards, and tax policy for MLPs influence operations, while macroeconomic drivers such as energy prices, interest rates, and global supply dynamics affect cash flow stability. Earnings trends among major holdings remain supported by long-term contracts, though geopolitical events and shifts in energy transition policies introduce sector risks. All three ETFs operate within this environment of durable infrastructure demand offset by commodity and regulatory volatility.
In recent market cycles, structural differences have contributed to varying behavior: AMLP’s high MLP concentration and C-corporation structure have led to distinct tax drag and sensitivity to MLP-specific distributions compared with the others. UMI’s active selection has emphasized income stability and potentially lower volatility through quality screens, while USAI’s balanced corporate-MLP mix has offered intermediate diversification. Relative positioning shows AMLP with deeper MLP exposure potentially amplifying cash flow yields but also concentration risk, UMI with active adjustments for momentum stability, and USAI with broader holdings reducing single-name risk. Performance differentials arise from expense ratios, rebalancing approaches, and varying degrees of direct commodity price exposure versus fee-based or contract-driven revenues.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking midstream energy infrastructure exposure can apply industry filters to compare ETFs like AMLP, UMI, and USAI alongside individual holdings.
Based on observable structural strength, diversification profile, cost efficiency, and risk-adjusted positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probability of favor to UMI. Its active management, lower expense ratio, and focus on high-quality midstream names with strong distribution coverage provide a balanced combination of income generation and reduced concentration risk relative to AMLP’s higher costs and MLP focus or USAI’s broader but passive allocation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| AMLP | UMI | USAI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 75% | 9 days ago 73% | 9 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BITI | 17.66 | 0.46 | +2.67% |
| ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) | |||
| ZVOL | 7.87 | 0.01 | +0.13% |
| Volatility Premium Plus ETF | |||
| USDU | 27.04 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| WisdomTree Bloomberg US Dollar Bullish Fund (USDU) | |||
| BNJ | 14.20 | -0.10 | -0.70% |
| Brookfield Finance I (UK) plc | |||
| EMCS | 46.84 | -0.46 | -0.98% |
| Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMCS) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMLP has been closely correlated with EPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMLP jumps, then EPD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMLP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMLP | 100% | -2.04% | ||
| EPD - AMLP | 71% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| WES - AMLP | 71% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| HESM - AMLP | 71% Closely correlated | -14.63% | ||
| ET - AMLP | 70% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| CQP - AMLP | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMI has been closely correlated with KMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMI jumps, then KMI could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USAI has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USAI jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USAI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USAI | 100% | -1.57% | ||
| OKE - USAI | 81% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| KMI - USAI | 78% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| TRGP - USAI | 78% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| WMB - USAI | 74% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| AM - USAI | 74% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
More | ||||