Investors and traders often compare ASAN, CRM, and DOCU due to their positions in the software industry, where work management, customer relationship management, and electronic signature solutions intersect with emerging artificial intelligence capabilities. This comparison appeals to those seeking exposure to enterprise software trends, including productivity platforms, customer engagement tools, and agreement automation. Market participants may use such analyses to assess relative positioning amid shifting sentiment around technology spending and AI integration.
Asana provides a work management platform designed for teams and enterprises. In recent market activity, the company reported second-quarter fiscal 2027 revenue of $216.4 million, representing 10% year-over-year growth that exceeded the high end of guidance. Non-GAAP operating margin expanded to 10%. The stock experienced downward pressure following the release, consistent with reactions to guidance that included a modest Q3 adjusted earnings per share target. Developments such as the upcoming launch of Agentic Work Management features have contributed to discussions around AI integration, though overall sentiment has reflected caution amid broader software sector dynamics.
Salesforce delivers customer relationship management software and related enterprise applications. Recent performance highlighted strong expansion in its artificial intelligence offerings, with Agentforce annual recurring revenue surpassing $1.5 billion. The company raised its full-year revenue guidance after reporting solid quarterly results. Market activity included attention around its Dreamforce event and the introduction of the Koa AI model developed with NVIDIA. Service disruptions noted during the conference period drew some commentary on operational reliability, while the stock showed resilience amid AI-focused narratives in the sector.
DocuSign specializes in electronic signature and agreement management solutions. In recent weeks, the company reported second-quarter fiscal 2027 revenue of $875.7 million, up 9.4% year over year, accompanied by an earnings beat. Intelligent Agreement Management accounted for 15.1% of total annual recurring revenue, with management projecting further increases. The stock recorded gains over the past month following the earnings release and an upward revision to full-year guidance. Recognition as a leader in industry evaluations has supported positive sentiment around its AI-driven platform enhancements.
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that features select AI trading bots from a larger library of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions appear in this highlighted area. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with statistics such as win rates, drawdowns, and trade volumes varying widely by bot. This resource allows users to explore automated approaches tailored to individual preferences. Review the Trending AI Robots page for current selections and details.
Business models differ notably: ASAN focuses on collaborative work management, CRM emphasizes comprehensive customer relationship tools with extensive ecosystem integrations, and DOCU centers on agreement lifecycle automation. Growth drivers include AI feature adoption across all three, though CRM reports the most substantial scale in AI recurring revenue. Recent momentum favored DOCU in price terms, while ASAN and CRM navigated post-earnings adjustments. Risk factors encompass execution on AI monetization, competition in enterprise software, and sensitivity to macroeconomic spending patterns. Sector exposure remains concentrated in technology, with valuation multiples reflecting expectations for sustained growth amid single-digit to low-double-digit revenue increases. Market sentiment has oscillated with earnings outcomes and AI narrative developments.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in AI revenue traction, relative scale, and positioning within enterprise workflows, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to CRM. Its established market presence and documented progress in high-growth AI segments provide a differentiated profile compared to the smaller peers in this group. Outcomes remain subject to ongoing market conditions and company execution.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
ASAN | CRM | DOCU | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 60 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 16 Undervalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 48 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 41 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 86 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (16) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASAN (62) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for DOCU (72) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRM's stock grew somewhat faster than ASAN’s and somewhat faster than DOCU’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ASAN (100) in the null industry, and is in the same range as DOCU (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRM's stock grew similarly to ASAN’s and similarly to DOCU’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's SMR Rating (48) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as DOCU (50) in the Packaged Software industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ASAN (98) in the null industry. This means that CRM's stock grew similarly to DOCU’s and somewhat faster than ASAN’s over the last 12 months.
DOCU's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ASAN (39) in the null industry, and is in the same range as CRM (41) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that DOCU's stock grew similarly to ASAN’s and similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.
DOCU's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CRM (86) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as ASAN (100) in the null industry. This means that DOCU's stock grew similarly to CRM’s and similarly to ASAN’s over the last 12 months.
| ASAN | CRM | DOCU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 67% | 12 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 84% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASAN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and DOCU’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASAN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and DOCU’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ASAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а +10.53% price change this week, while CRM (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.76% , and DOCU (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +2.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.39%.
ASAN is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2026.
CRM is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2026.
DOCU is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ATA.X | 0.000774 | 0.000043 | +5.95% |
| Automata Network cryptocurrency | |||
| IOTX.X | 0.003800 | 0.000074 | +1.98% |
| IoTeX cryptocurrency | |||
| BAT.X | 0.102596 | 0.000657 | +0.64% |
| Basic Attention Token cryptocurrency | |||
| WBTC.X | 81588.870000 | -1619.414100 | -1.95% |
| Wrapped Bitcoin cryptocurrency | |||
| DYM.X | 0.017179 | -0.000573 | -3.23% |
| Dymension cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASAN has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASAN jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASAN | 100% | +5.79% | ||
| WDAY - ASAN | 76% Closely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| FRSH - ASAN | 75% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| HUBS - ASAN | 74% Closely correlated | +5.25% | ||
| TEAM - ASAN | 72% Closely correlated | +3.97% | ||
| NOW - ASAN | 71% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 100% | +1.44% | ||
| NOW - CRM | 78% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| HUBS - CRM | 76% Closely correlated | +5.25% | ||
| ADBE - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| WDAY - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| FRSH - CRM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOCU has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DOCU jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DOCU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOCU | 100% | +3.67% | ||
| FRSH - DOCU | 72% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| WDAY - DOCU | 71% Closely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| HUBS - DOCU | 70% Closely correlated | +5.25% | ||
| ASAN - DOCU | 70% Closely correlated | +5.79% | ||
| BL - DOCU | 68% Closely correlated | +3.25% | ||
More | ||||