Advertisement
BEN or BX or EFC
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BEN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and EFC’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- BEN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- BX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- EFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BEN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and EFC’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BEN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.80% price change this week, while BX (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.94% , and EFC (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price fluctuated +0.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.59%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
BEN is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.
BX is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.
EFC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+2.07% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.48% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| BEN | BX | EFC | |
| Capitalization | 14.8B | 98.7B | 989M |
| EBITDA | 2.08B | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | 14.162 | -18.894 | 11.730 |
| P/E Ratio | 14.54 | 71.21 | 13.06 |
| Revenue | 7.87B | 7.01B | 257M |
| Total Cash | 3.88B | N/A | N/A |
| Total Debt | 11.8B | 12.3B | 13.3B |
BEN | BX | EFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 50 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 44 Fair valued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 35 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 38 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 59 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 59 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EFC's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BEN (18) and is in the same range as BX (44). This means that EFC's stock grew similarly to BEN’s and similarly to BX’s over the last 12 months.
EFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BX (35) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (60). This means that EFC's stock grew similarly to BX’s and somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.
EFC's SMR Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BX (38) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (87). This means that EFC's stock grew similarly to BX’s and somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.
BEN's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as EFC (48) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BX (59). This means that BEN's stock grew similarly to EFC’s and somewhat faster than BX’s over the last 12 months.
BEN's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BX (59) and is significantly better than the same rating for EFC (95). This means that BEN's stock grew somewhat faster than BX’s and significantly faster than EFC’s over the last 12 months.
| BEN | BX | EFC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 72% | 10 days ago 63% | 6 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 35% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
BEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BEN has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BEN jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEN | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| IVZ - BEN | 83% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| TROW - BEN | 78% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| BLK - BEN | 75% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| APAM - BEN | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| VRTS - BEN | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
EFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFC has been closely correlated with STWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFC jumps, then STWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFC | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| STWD - EFC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| NLY - EFC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| RITM - EFC | 74% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| RWT - EFC | 73% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| TWO - EFC | 72% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
More | ||||