BLK
Price
$1108.45
Change
+$8.96 (+0.81%)
Updated
Sep 4, 03:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
170.26B
36 days until earnings call
KKR
Price
$137.95
Change
+$3.12 (+2.31%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
120.13B
61 days until earnings call
WT
Price
$13.65
Change
+$0.14 (+1.04%)
Updated
Sep 4, 11:43 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.99B
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLK or KKR or WT

Header iconBLK vs KKR vs WT Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs KKR vs WTBanner chart's image
Blackrock
Price$1108.45
Change+$8.96 (+0.81%)
Volume$100
Capitalization170.26B
KKR & Co
Price$137.95
Change+$3.12 (+2.31%)
Volume$3.61K
Capitalization120.13B
WisdomTree
Price$13.65
Change+$0.14 (+1.04%)
Volume$131
Capitalization1.99B
BLK vs KKR vs WT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KKR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BLK: $1099.49KKR: $134.83WT: $13.51)
Brand notoriety: BLK and KKR are not notable and WT is notable
The three companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 80%, KKR: 117%, WT: 76%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $170.26B, KKR: $120.13B, WT: $1.99B
$BLK is valued at $170.26B, while KKR has a market capitalization of $120.13B, and WT's market capitalization is $1.99B. The market cap for tickers in this @Investment Managers ranges from $170.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Investment Managers industry is $7.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileKKR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and WT’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • KKR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLK and WT are a better buy in the long-term than KKR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KKR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and WT’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KKR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • WT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the short-term than WT, which in turn is a better option than KKR.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.84% price change this week, while KKR (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.02% , and WT (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 10, 2025.

KKR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

WT is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.59% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($170B) has a higher market cap than KKR($120B) and WT($1.99B). KKR has higher P/E ratio than WT and BLK: KKR (63.60) vs WT (32.95) and BLK (26.58). WT YTD gains are higher at: 29.758 vs. BLK (8.412) and KKR (-8.467). BLK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.76B vs. KKR (8.74B) and WT (125M). KKR has more cash in the bank: 41.2B vs. BLK (11.6B) and WT (291M). WT has less debt than BLK and KKR: WT (515M) vs BLK (14.7B) and KKR (52.5B). BLK has higher revenues than KKR and WT: BLK (21.6B) vs KKR (16B) and WT (445M).
BLKKKRWT
Capitalization170B120B1.99B
EBITDA9.76B8.74B125M
Gain YTD8.412-8.46729.758
P/E Ratio26.5863.6032.95
Revenue21.6B16B445M
Total Cash11.6B41.2B291M
Total Debt14.7B52.5B515M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs KKR vs WT: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
KKR
WT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
795881
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
303418
SMR RATING
1..100
547658
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
295039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28812
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WT's Valuation (32) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (33) and is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (77). This means that WT's stock grew similarly to BLK’s and somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.

WT's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (30) and is in the same range as KKR (34). This means that WT's stock grew similarly to BLK’s and similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's SMR Rating (54) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as WT (58) and is in the same range as KKR (76). This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to WT’s and similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as WT (39) and is in the same range as KKR (50). This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to WT’s and similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.

KKR's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as WT (12) and is in the same range as BLK (28). This means that KKR's stock grew similarly to WT’s and similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKKKRWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KKR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KRBN31.710.28
+0.89%
KraneShares Global Carbon ETF
SCHE31.530.07
+0.22%
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF™
CPSR24.620.02
+0.06%
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March
MDLV27.55-0.10
-0.35%
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
NANR61.77-0.56
-0.90%
SPDR S&P® North American Natural Res ETF

WT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WT has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WT jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WT
1D Price
Change %
WT100%
N/A
JHG - WT
69%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
KKR - WT
68%
Closely correlated
-2.82%
CG - WT
67%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
EQH - WT
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
AMP - WT
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
More