It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
C’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCLVT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
C’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLVT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and EQH’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
C (@Major Banks) experienced а +7.56% price change this week, while CLVT (@Information Technology Services) price change was +2.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +3.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.71%.
C is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.
CLVT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
@Information Technology Services (+4.42% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
C | CLVT | EQH | |
Capitalization | 121B | 2.94B | 12.5B |
EBITDA | N/A | 432M | N/A |
Gain YTD | 21.670 | -15.157 | 19.804 |
P/E Ratio | 15.71 | N/A | 10.76 |
Revenue | 78.5B | 2.53B | 10.5B |
Total Cash | 27.3B | 354M | 75.3B |
Total Debt | 324B | 4.6B | 5.63B |
C | CLVT | EQH | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 93 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 59 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 46 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
C's Valuation (37) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as EQH (39) and is in the same range as CLVT (50). This means that C's stock grew similarly to EQH’s and similarly to CLVT’s over the last 12 months.
EQH's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as C (32) and is significantly better than the same rating for CLVT (100). This means that EQH's stock grew similarly to C’s and significantly faster than CLVT’s over the last 12 months.
C's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as EQH (12) and is significantly better than the same rating for CLVT (93). This means that C's stock grew similarly to EQH’s and significantly faster than CLVT’s over the last 12 months.
C's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQH (45) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CLVT (59). This means that C's stock grew somewhat faster than EQH’s and somewhat faster than CLVT’s over the last 12 months.
EQH's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CLVT (46) and is somewhat better than the same rating for C (82). This means that EQH's stock grew similarly to CLVT’s and somewhat faster than C’s over the last 12 months.
C | CLVT | EQH | |
---|---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 4 days ago68% | 4 days ago55% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago62% | 4 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 4 days ago66% | 4 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 5 days ago65% | 5 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago68% | 8 days ago79% | 18 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago57% | N/A | 4 days ago65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLVT has been loosely correlated with FLYW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLVT jumps, then FLYW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLVT | 100% | -2.05% | ||
FLYW - CLVT | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
PSFE - CLVT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
PAY - CLVT | 51% Loosely correlated | -4.36% | ||
AI - CLVT | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
VYX - CLVT | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.