C
Price
$85.10
Change
+$0.72 (+0.85%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
121.12B
14 days until earnings call
CLVT
Price
$4.30
Change
-$0.01 (-0.23%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.94B
31 days until earnings call
EQH
Price
$56.10
Change
+$0.14 (+0.25%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.53B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

C or CLVT or EQH

Header iconC vs CLVT vs EQH Comparison
Open Charts C vs CLVT vs EQHBanner chart's image
Citigroup
Price$85.10
Change+$0.72 (+0.85%)
Volume$111.54K
Capitalization121.12B
Clarivate
Price$4.30
Change-$0.01 (-0.23%)
Volume$67.86K
Capitalization2.94B
Equitable Holdings
Price$56.10
Change+$0.14 (+0.25%)
Volume$11.49K
Capitalization12.53B
C vs CLVT vs EQH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (C: $84.38 vs. CLVT: $4.31)
Brand notoriety: C: Notable vs. CLVT: Not notable
C represents the Major Banks, while CLVT is part of the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: C: 181% vs. CLVT: 130%
Market capitalization -- C: $121.12B vs. CLVT: $2.94B
C [@Major Banks] is valued at $121.12B. CLVT’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $2.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $273.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

C’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCLVT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • C’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CLVT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, C is a better buy in the long-term than CLVT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

C’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLVT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and EQH’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • C’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLVT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • EQH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLVT is a better buy in the short-term than EQH, which in turn is a better option than C.

Price Growth

C (@Major Banks) experienced а +7.56% price change this week, while CLVT (@Information Technology Services) price change was +2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +3.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.29%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

C is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.

CLVT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+3.37% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

@Information Technology Services (+4.42% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
C($121B) has a higher market cap than EQH($12.5B) and CLVT($2.94B). C YTD gains are higher at: 21.670 vs. EQH (19.804) and CLVT (-15.157). EQH has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. C (27.3B) and CLVT (354M). CLVT has less debt than EQH and C: CLVT (4.6B) vs EQH (5.63B) and C (324B). C has higher revenues than EQH and CLVT: C (78.5B) vs EQH (10.5B) and CLVT (2.53B).
CCLVTEQH
Capitalization121B2.94B12.5B
EBITDAN/A432MN/A
Gain YTD21.670-15.15719.804
P/E Ratio15.71N/A10.76
Revenue78.5B2.53B10.5B
Total Cash27.3B354M75.3B
Total Debt324B4.6B5.63B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
C vs CLVT vs EQH: Fundamental Ratings
C
CLVT
EQH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
505050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
321006
SMR RATING
1..100
19312
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
85945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
824626
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (37) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as EQH (39) and is in the same range as CLVT (50). This means that C's stock grew similarly to EQH’s and similarly to CLVT’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as C (32) and is significantly better than the same rating for CLVT (100). This means that EQH's stock grew similarly to C’s and significantly faster than CLVT’s over the last 12 months.

C's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as EQH (12) and is significantly better than the same rating for CLVT (93). This means that C's stock grew similarly to EQH’s and significantly faster than CLVT’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQH (45) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CLVT (59). This means that C's stock grew somewhat faster than EQH’s and somewhat faster than CLVT’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CLVT (46) and is somewhat better than the same rating for C (82). This means that EQH's stock grew similarly to CLVT’s and somewhat faster than C’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCLVTEQH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMG55.050.78
+1.44%
Chipotle Mexican Grill
SM25.10-0.34
-1.34%
SM Energy Company
KRO6.27-0.10
-1.57%
Kronos Worldwide
PRTS0.75-0.03
-3.74%
CarParts.com
PRME2.42-0.23
-8.68%
Prime Medicine

CLVT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLVT has been loosely correlated with FLYW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLVT jumps, then FLYW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLVT
1D Price
Change %
CLVT100%
-2.05%
FLYW - CLVT
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
PSFE - CLVT
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
PAY - CLVT
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.36%
AI - CLVT
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
VYX - CLVT
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
More

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
-0.11%
AIG - EQH
69%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
HIG - EQH
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
AEG - EQH
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
ORI - EQH
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
AVVIY - EQH
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
More