Advertisement
CGAU or FNV or PAAS
CGAU | FNV | PAAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 66 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 31 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 38 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 31 | 46 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 54 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 85 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGAU (23) in the null industry, and is in the same range as FNV (31) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PAAS's stock grew similarly to CGAU’s and similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.
CGAU's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as FNV (38) in the Precious Metals industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PAAS (52) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU's stock grew similarly to FNV’s and somewhat faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
CGAU's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (43) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as FNV (46) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU's stock grew similarly to PAAS’s and similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.
CGAU's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FNV (54) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as PAAS (59) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU's stock grew similarly to FNV’s and similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
FNV's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (91) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as CGAU (99) in the null industry. This means that FNV's stock grew similarly to PAAS’s and similarly to CGAU’s over the last 12 months.
| CGAU | FNV | PAAS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 59% | 6 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 63% | 20 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 62% | 7 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGAU’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while FNV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PAAS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- CGAU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- FNV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGAU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PAAS’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CGAU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FNV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PAAS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CGAU (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.50% price change this week, while FNV (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.60% , and PAAS (@Precious Metals) price fluctuated -0.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
CGAU is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
FNV is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-1.12% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
Advertisement
CGAU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGAU has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGAU jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGAU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGAU | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| AEM - CGAU | 89% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| IAG - CGAU | 89% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| WPM - CGAU | 88% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| KGC - CGAU | 87% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| NEM - CGAU | 86% Closely correlated | +0.49% | ||
More | ||||
FNV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNV has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNV jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.
PAAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAAS | 100% | +1.32% | ||
| WPM - PAAS | 90% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| FSM - PAAS | 89% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| AEM - PAAS | 87% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| IAG - PAAS | 87% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| CGAU - PAAS | 86% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||