CGAU
Price
$21.57
Change
+$0.33 (+1.55%)
Updated
Aug 14, 10:59 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.16B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FNV
Price
$231.57
Change
-$4.37 (-1.85%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
44.72B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGAU vs FNV

CGAU vs FNV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 10, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Centerra Gold (CGAU) vs. Franco-Nevada (FNV) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CGAU has delivered significantly stronger year-to-date and one-year returns compared to FNV, reflecting robust operational momentum in recent market activity.
  • CGAU operates as a primary gold producer with direct exposure to mining operations, while FNV follows a royalty and streaming model that offers lower operational risk and more stable cash flows.
  • Recent weeks have seen CGAU benefit from elevated gold prices and positive production guidance updates, driving outperformance relative to broader market benchmarks.
  • FNV maintains a more defensive profile with lower volatility and consistent dividend payments, appealing to investors seeking reduced sector-specific execution risks.
  • Market sentiment favors CGAU amid strong recent earnings momentum, whereas FNV is positioned for steady performance ahead of its upcoming quarterly results.
  • Relative positioning highlights a trade-off between growth potential in producers like CGAU and the resilience of royalty-focused names like FNV.

Introduction

This comparison examines CGAU and FNV within the gold sector, where differing business models influence performance in varying market conditions. Centerra Gold Inc. engages in active mining and production, while Franco-Nevada Corporation focuses on royalty and streaming agreements that provide exposure without direct operational involvement. The analysis is relevant for traders monitoring momentum in precious metals equities and for investors evaluating risk-adjusted returns across producer and royalty strategies amid fluctuating commodity prices and broader equity market dynamics.

CGAU Overview and Recent Performance

Centerra Gold Inc. is a gold mining company with operations primarily in Central Asia and North America. In recent weeks, the stock has shown strong upward momentum, with year-to-date returns exceeding 47% and one-year returns surpassing 183% as of early August 2026, significantly outpacing the S&P/TSX Composite index. This performance has been supported by favorable gold price movements and company-specific developments, including raised production guidance following solid second-quarter 2026 results and an expanded share repurchase program. Sentiment has improved as operational execution strengthened, with shares trading near multi-year highs around the $19–$21 range amid elevated trading volumes.

FNV Overview and Recent Performance

Franco-Nevada Corporation operates as a leading royalty and streaming company, generating revenue from agreements tied to mining production without bearing direct operating costs. In recent market activity, the stock has posted more moderate gains, with year-to-date returns around 15% and one-year returns near 40% as of early August 2026. Performance has remained relatively stable, supported by the company’s low-leverage balance sheet and consistent dividend payouts. Upcoming second-quarter 2026 results, scheduled for release on August 11, 2026, represent a key near-term catalyst, while the stock has traded in a range centered around $230–$240, reflecting its defensive characteristics within the precious metals space.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that can trade thousands of different tickers across various strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only the highest-performing and most suitable bots for current conditions are featured in this section, with available bots demonstrating win rates often ranging from 55% to over 80%, profit factors between 1.2 and 3.0, and maximum drawdowns typically managed below 20–30% depending on the strategy. These bots employ diverse approaches including trend following, mean reversion, and momentum tactics, each with unique statistics and ticker sets. Review the options on the Trending AI Robots page to explore tools aligned with individual trading preferences.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CGAU and FNV represent contrasting approaches within the gold sector. CGAU’s producer model delivers higher operational leverage to gold prices, contributing to stronger recent momentum but also greater exposure to cost inflation, regulatory risks, and production variability. In contrast, FNV’s royalty and streaming structure provides more predictable margins and lower capital intensity, resulting in reduced volatility and steadier performance across market cycles. Recent relative performance shows CGAU leading in upside capture during gold rallies, while FNV offers better downside protection. Sector exposure is similar, yet market sentiment has tilted toward producers amid positive earnings surprises, creating a clear trade-off between growth-oriented participation and defensive positioning.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, recent momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term performance to CGAU. Stronger operational catalysts and elevated returns in recent market activity support this assessment, though FNV retains advantages in stability that could prove valuable in more uncertain environments. This evaluation reflects probabilistic analysis of available data rather than definitive outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CGAU vs. FNV commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGAU is a StrongBuy and FNV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CGAU: $21.24 vs. FNV: $231.57)
Brand notoriety: CGAU and FNV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGAU: 100% vs. FNV: 98%
Market capitalization -- CGAU: $4.16B vs. FNV: $44.72B
CGAU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.16B. FNV’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $44.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $13.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGAU’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFNV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGAU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FNV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CGAU and FNV are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGAU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGAU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CGAU and FNV are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CGAU (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.22% price change this week, while FNV (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGAU is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

FNV is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNV($44.7B) has a higher market cap than CGAU($4.16B). FNV has higher P/E ratio than CGAU: FNV (30.27) vs CGAU (6.79). CGAU YTD gains are higher at: 47.808 vs. FNV (12.140). FNV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.06B vs. CGAU (1B). CGAU has more cash in the bank: 457M vs. FNV (434M). CGAU has less debt than FNV: CGAU (45.8M) vs FNV (82.6M). FNV has higher revenues than CGAU: FNV (2.11B) vs CGAU (1.72B).
CGAUFNVCGAU / FNV
Capitalization4.16B44.7B9%
EBITDA1B2.06B49%
Gain YTD47.80812.140394%
P/E Ratio6.7930.2722%
Revenue1.72B2.11B82%
Total Cash457M434M105%
Total Debt45.8M82.6M55%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGAU vs FNV: Fundamental Ratings
CGAU
FNV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3936
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2146
SMR RATING
1..100
3147
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9883
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2649

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGAU's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as FNV (30) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as FNV (46) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as FNV (47) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FNV (46) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.

FNV's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGAU (98) in the null industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew similarly to CGAU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGAUFNV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGAU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FNV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLIN1.100.01
+0.92%
Bridgeline Digital
ACEL12.410.07
+0.57%
Accel Entertainment
BEBE10.00N/A
N/A
TGE Value Creative Solutions Corp
MT73.21-0.97
-1.31%
ArcelorMittal
MUR34.79-0.47
-1.33%
Murphy Oil Corp

FNV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNV has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNV jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNV
1D Price
Change %
FNV100%
-1.85%
WPM - FNV
88%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
AEM - FNV
88%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
OR - FNV
86%
Closely correlated
-2.67%
KGC - FNV
85%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
CGAU - FNV
83%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
More