Advertisement
CLSK or COIN or ESTC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Coinbase Global (COIN) vs. Elastic (ESTC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CLSK has delivered strong year-to-date gains near 58% amid Bitcoin production stability and expansion into AI-ready power capacity.
- COIN trades as a leveraged play on cryptocurrency markets, with recent performance reflecting broader digital asset volatility and a year-to-date return of approximately 18%.
- ESTC offers exposure to enterprise search and data analytics with AI applications, though shares have declined notably from 52-week highs amid sector rotation.
- The three stocks span distinct sectors—Bitcoin mining with AI pivot for CLSK, crypto exchange for COIN, and software infrastructure for ESTC—creating varied risk-return profiles.
- Relative momentum favors CLSK in recent market activity, while COIN and ESTC show greater sensitivity to macroeconomic and sector-specific pressures.
- Valuation sensitivity differs markedly, with CLSK and COIN tied to crypto cycles and ESTC to software growth multiples.
Introduction
Traders and investors seeking exposure across cryptocurrency infrastructure, digital asset exchanges, and enterprise software often evaluate CLSK, COIN, and ESTC together due to their distinct yet interconnected market drivers. This comparison highlights differences in business models, recent price behavior, and positioning within volatile sectors. The analysis appeals to those monitoring relative performance in technology-adjacent and growth-oriented equities amid shifting market sentiment.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark operates as a Bitcoin mining company that has increasingly emphasized monetization of its power infrastructure for artificial intelligence applications. In recent weeks, the stock has shown resilience, trading near $16 with year-to-date gains exceeding 57%. Operational updates indicate steady Bitcoin production levels around 640 units in April alongside a hashrate near 50 EH/s. Sentiment has benefited from analyst price target increases and the company’s pivot toward AI-ready capacity, offsetting a reported quarterly net loss. Broader market activity reflects ongoing interest in crypto-related equities with infrastructure expansion narratives.
COIN Overview and Recent Performance
Coinbase Global provides a leading cryptocurrency exchange platform with trading, custody, and related financial services. The stock has experienced pressure in recent market activity, closing near $185 amid daily declines of over 4% on some sessions. Year-to-date returns stand around 18%, trailing broader equity benchmarks in relative terms. Performance remains closely linked to digital asset price movements and trading volumes, with recent weeks reflecting softer crypto sentiment. The company continues to expand product offerings, including futures-related features, though earnings results earlier in the period highlighted revenue challenges tied to market conditions.
ESTC Overview and Recent Performance
Elastic develops search and data analytics software used in enterprise environments, with growing applications in artificial intelligence and observability. Shares have traded near $54 in recent weeks, down substantially from 52-week highs above $96. Year-to-date performance shows gains near 29%, supported by AI-related product momentum, yet overall sentiment has been tempered by sector-wide software multiple compression. The company maintains a focus on subscription growth and new AI tools, positioning it within the broader technology infrastructure space amid fluctuating investor appetite for high-growth software names.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. While Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that can trade thousands of different tickers, only the strongest performers with suitable strategies for current environments earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, allowing users to review metrics such as win rates, drawdowns, and trade frequency across various instruments. This resource provides traders with data-driven insights into automated approaches. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CLSK, COIN, and ESTC differ sharply in business models: CLSK combines Bitcoin mining with emerging AI power monetization, COIN centers on crypto exchange and custody services, and ESTC delivers software for search and analytics. Growth drivers include crypto production scale and infrastructure reuse for CLSK, trading volumes and product expansion for COIN, and AI adoption within enterprise data platforms for ESTC. Recent momentum has favored CLSK relative to peers, while COIN exhibits higher correlation to cryptocurrency price swings and ESTC faces software valuation headwinds. Risk factors encompass regulatory exposure for COIN, energy and crypto price volatility for CLSK, and competition plus multiple compression for ESTC. Sector exposure spans digital assets and infrastructure versus pure software, creating trade-offs in cyclical sensitivity versus growth stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, operational catalysts including hashrate expansion and AI positioning, and relative stability versus peer volatility, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to CLSK among the three. This assessment reflects stronger recent momentum and diversified infrastructure drivers compared with the crypto-cycle dependence of COIN and the valuation pressures on ESTC. Such evaluations remain probabilistic and subject to ongoing market shifts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and ESTC’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- COIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ESTC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and ESTC’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- COIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ESTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -9.16% price change this week, while COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -10.63% , and ESTC (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated -9.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.89%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.40%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.70%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
COIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
ESTC is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.80% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.71% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
@Packaged Software (-3.48% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CLSK | COIN | ESTC | |
| Capitalization | 3.82B | 41B | 6.37B |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 1.29B | 38.4M |
| Gain YTD | 57.806 | -31.237 | -18.796 |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 57.17 | 17.86 |
| Revenue | 740M | 6.56B | 1.68B |
| Total Cash | 935M | 10.7B | 1.25B |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 7.96B | 592M |
CLSK | ESTC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as ESTC (72) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ESTC (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ESTC (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ESTC (48) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
ESTC's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (86) in the null industry. This means that ESTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | COIN | ESTC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 13 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFSV | 38.11 | 0.31 | +0.82% |
| Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | |||
| EBUF | 31.41 | 0.03 | +0.08% |
| Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buf ETF-Qt | |||
| ZSC | 29.96 | N/A | N/A |
| USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy | |||
| BRNY | 55.92 | -0.05 | -0.10% |
| Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | |||
| DALI | 29.78 | -0.05 | -0.16% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright DALI 1 ETF | |||
ESTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESTC has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESTC jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESTC | 100% | -1.42% | ||
| COIN - ESTC | 66% Closely correlated | -4.08% | ||
| DT - ESTC | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| CLSK - ESTC | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| CRM - ESTC | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| SNOW - ESTC | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||