Advertisement
CLSK or HIVE or IREN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE) vs. IREN Limited (IREN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CLSK exhibits solid YTD gains of 32.51% with a market cap of $3.43B, driven by Bitcoin mining expansions and AI data center pivots.
- HIVE shows 10.51% YTD return and $719M market cap, bolstered by $115M funding for AI infrastructure amid green energy data centers.
- IREN leads with 44.93% YTD and explosive 784.33% 1-year return, market cap $18.16B, fueled by $625M Mirantis acquisition for AI cloud growth.
- All three stocks operate in Bitcoin mining but are shifting toward AI/high-performance computing (HPC), with IREN showing the strongest momentum from recent deals.
- Relative performance reflects sector volatility tied to Bitcoin prices and AI demand, with IREN outperforming on scale and catalysts.
- Market positioning favors diversified AI exposure over pure mining amid evolving energy and compute demands.
Introduction
This comparison examines CLSK, HIVE, and IREN, three prominent Bitcoin mining companies increasingly pivoting to AI and high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructure. These stocks appeal to traders seeking exposure to cryptocurrency volatility and the surging demand for data centers powered by renewable energy. Investors interested in relative performance, sector shifts, and growth drivers in the digital asset and AI markets will find this analysis relevant, highlighting contrasts in momentum, scale, and strategic developments amid recent market activity.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) is a Bitcoin mining company operating data centers and power assets across the Americas, emphasizing sustainable infrastructure. In recent weeks, the stock has traded around $13.89, reflecting a 32.51% YTD gain and 65.76% over one year, with a market cap of $3.43B. Performance has been influenced by operational expansions, such as Texas site growth and Bitcoin production increases to 658 BTC in March. Sentiment has shifted positively with analyst upgrades, like Needham's price target hike to $18 amid hyperscaler talks, though profitability concerns from projected revenue declines persist. Recent market activity highlights a strategic pivot, including rebuilding a 250 MW data center for AI/HPC with passive cooling innovations, boosting investor interest in diversification beyond mining.
HIVE Overview and Recent Performance
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE) builds and operates green energy data centers in locations like Paraguay and Canada, focusing on digital currency mining and HPC hosting. The stock recently closed at $2.84, up 9.23% in a session, with 10.51% YTD and 65.12% one-year returns, and a $719M market cap. Recent weeks saw high volume amid funding announcements, including a $115M private offering of exchangeable senior notes for AI expansion. Wall Street maintains Buy ratings, with targets up to $10, driven by plans for $250M AI revenue in 2026. Sentiment reflects confidence in the shift from mining to AI infrastructure, supported by hashrate growth to 25 EH/s and gross margins at 34.5%, though GAAP losses from depreciation temper gains.
IREN Overview and Recent Performance
IREN Limited (formerly Iris Energy; IREN) runs vertically integrated data centers powered by 100% renewables in Australia and Canada, mining Bitcoin while expanding into AI cloud services. Trading near $57.98, it boasts 44.93% YTD and 784.33% one-year returns, with an $18.16B market cap. Recent performance surged on the $625M Mirantis acquisition to bolster AI cloud capabilities, adding Kubernetes expertise and 1,500+ enterprise clients, sparking a 45% rally. Upcoming Q3 earnings anticipate $213M revenue despite expected losses. Sentiment is buoyant from AI optimism and Bitcoin's push above $80K, positioning IREN as a leader in the mining-to-AI transition, with Sweetwater 1 data center energization enhancing growth prospects.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only 25 standout bots out of 351 total are highlighted, showcasing annualized returns from 23% to 169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, spanning sectors like semiconductors, data centers, AI infrastructure, and volatility plays—including bots targeting bitcoin miners like CIFR. These bots employ momentum, sector rotation, and risk management for real-time signals, often outperforming benchmarks. Traders can explore these high-conviction options tailored to current volatility in tech and crypto-related stocks. Visit Trending AI Robots to review performance stats and subscribe for copy trading.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CLSK, HIVE, and IREN share Bitcoin mining roots with green energy focus but diverge in scale and AI diversification. Business models emphasize owned data centers, yet IREN's vertical integration and $18B+ market cap dwarf CLSK ($3.4B) and HIVE ($0.7B). Growth drivers include mining output—CLSK at 658 BTC/month—and AI pivots: IREN's $625M Mirantis deal for cloud vs. HIVE's $115M notes for $250M AI revenue target vs. CLSK's 250MW HPC rebuild. Recent momentum favors IREN (45% rally), with YTD returns 44.9% vs. 32.5% (CLSK) and 10.5% (HIVE). Risks involve Bitcoin halvings, energy costs, and dilution; HIVE faces higher debt leverage. Valuation sensitivity ties to AI catalysts over mining, with IREN commanding premium multiples amid superior sentiment.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors IREN based on superior trend consistency, with 44.93% YTD gains and 784% one-year momentum, underpinned by the transformative $625M Mirantis acquisition and AI cloud positioning. Relative to peers, IREN exhibits stronger catalysts and scale, enhancing probabilistic outperformance in AI-driven markets, though volatility persists across all three.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHIVE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and IREN’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HIVE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IREN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIVE’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and IREN’s TA Score reflects 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HIVE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- IREN’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.45% price change this week, while HIVE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.18% , and IREN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price fluctuated +3.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
IREN is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.60% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| CLSK | HIVE | IREN | |
| Capitalization | 3.46B | 718M | 20.2B |
| EBITDA | 139M | 17.5M | 725M |
| Gain YTD | 33.103 | 9.884 | 49.748 |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 9.17 | 73.45 |
| Revenue | 785M | 257M | 757M |
| Total Cash | 1.29B | 26.2M | 3.26B |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 18.1M | 3.84B |
CLSK | HIVE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HIVE's Valuation (68) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CLSK (69) in the null industry. This means that HIVE’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
HIVE's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CLSK (100) in the null industry. This means that HIVE’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as HIVE (96) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HIVE (39) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.
HIVE's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (86) in the null industry. This means that HIVE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | HIVE | IREN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 88% | 15 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement