CMS
Price
$73.31
Change
+$0.12 (+0.16%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
22.65B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ETR
Price
$112.93
Change
-$0.04 (-0.04%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
51.71B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LNT
Price
$72.59
Change
+$0.12 (+0.17%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
18.75B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMS or ETR or LNT

Header iconCMS vs ETR vs LNT Comparison
Open Charts CMS vs ETR vs LNTBanner chart's image
CMS vs ETR vs LNT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? CMS Energy (CMS) vs. Entergy (ETR) vs. Alliant Energy (LNT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ETR leads YTD performance at approximately 28%, driven by data center deals and robust industrial load growth, outpacing CMS (8%) and LNT (15%).
  • All three reported strong Q1 2026 earnings beats, reaffirming full-year adjusted EPS guidance: CMS $3.83–$3.90, ETR $4.25–$4.45, LNT $3.36–$3.46.
  • Dividend yields remain attractive for income investors: CMS ~3.0%, LNT ~2.8%, ETR ~2.2%, with consistent payout growth.
  • ETR boasts the largest market cap (~$54B) and highest growth catalysts from hyperscale agreements, while CMS and LNT emphasize renewable investments and rate base expansion.
  • P/E ratios (TTM) show CMS (~21x) and LNT (~23x) as relatively cheaper than ETR (~30x), reflecting growth premium.
  • Common risks include regulatory approvals, weather impacts, and rising interest rates affecting capex-heavy utilities.

Introduction

This comparison examines three regulated electric utilities—CMS Energy, ETR (Entergy), and LNT (Alliant Energy)—in the context of rising power demand from data centers and industrial growth. These Midwest and Southern operators benefit from stable cash flows, dividend reliability, and capex plans supporting clean energy transitions. Income-focused investors and those seeking defensive positioning amid market volatility will find value in analyzing their relative performance, growth drivers, and valuation in today's environment.

CMS Overview and Recent Performance

CMS Energy, headquartered in Michigan, operates through its primary subsidiary Consumers Energy, serving 1.9 million electric and 1.8 million gas customers. The company focuses on electric and gas utilities alongside its NorthStar Clean Energy segment for renewables. In recent market activity, CMS shares have shown steady gains, up about 8% YTD, trading around $75 with a market cap of $23B. Q1 2026 adjusted EPS of $1.13 beat estimates despite weather headwinds, with revenue up 11.6% YoY to $2.73B. The firm reaffirmed 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $3.83–$3.90 and long-term 6-8% growth, bolstered by a supportive regulatory environment, load growth from data centers, and a $24B+ capex plan emphasizing grid modernization and renewables. Sentiment remains positive on durable earnings visibility, though weather and regulatory timing pose influences.

ETR Overview and Recent Performance

ETR (Entergy), based in New Orleans, generates, transmits, and distributes electricity to 3 million customers across Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. With ~25GW capacity from diverse sources including nuclear and renewables, it emphasizes hyperscale data center support. Recent weeks have seen strong momentum, with shares up ~28% YTD near $117 and a $54B market cap. Q1 2026 adjusted EPS hit $0.86 (beat), with 6% retail sales growth amid rising costs. Guidance for 2026 adjusted EPS $4.25–$4.45 holds firm, backed by a $57B four-year capex plan (up 33%) fueled by Meta and other data center deals projecting 8.5% retail sales CAGR through 2029. Positive drivers include industrial demand and customer savings initiatives, offset by execution risks in large-scale infrastructure.

LNT Overview and Recent Performance

LNT (Alliant Energy), headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin, provides regulated electric and natural gas to ~1 million electric and 435,000 gas customers via subsidiaries Interstate Power and Light and Wisconsin Power and Light. Recent performance reflects resilience, with shares up ~15% YTD around $73 and an $19B market cap. Q1 2026 ongoing EPS of $0.82 met expectations, supported by renewable and data center pursuits. The company reaffirmed 2026 guidance of $3.36–$3.46, targeting 6.6% growth, with a $13.4B capex ramp for infrastructure. Key influences include expanding customer base, data center contracts driving 60%+ peak demand growth, and rate base expansion, balanced against rising transmission costs and financing needs.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, selected from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. AI analyzes all bots to highlight 25 trending ones best suited to current market conditions like volatility in growth areas such as semiconductors, industrials, and data centers. These bots boast impressive stats: annualized returns up to 169%, win rates of 51–88%, and profit factors from 1.5 to 11.7. For instance, a semiconductors bot delivers 83% returns with 68% win rate, while multi-ticker industrials strategies hit 94% annualized gains at 66% win rate. Varying styles—from momentum to sector rotation—enable adaptation to trends like AI infrastructure demand. Explore these curated performers to potentially enhance your trading edge in dynamic markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

All three operate regulated utility models with ~95% EBITDA from low-risk operations, but differ in scale and growth profiles. ETR's larger footprint and hyperscale data center pacts (e.g., Meta adding $14B capex) drive superior momentum and 8.5% sales CAGR vs. CMS's Michigan-focused renewables/grid upgrades (6-8% EPS growth) and LNT's Midwest data center/renewable push (6.6% growth). Recent relative performance favors ETR on industrial load, while CMS and LNT offer stability. Valuation sensitivity shows ETR at premium P/E (~30x) for catalysts, vs. CMS (21x) and LNT (23x). Risks include regulatory delays on rate cases (ROE approvals), interest rate hikes pressuring capex leverage, and weather variability; sector exposure ties all to clean energy transitions amid rising demand.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI leans toward ETR in the current environment, given its trend consistency from data center catalysts, superior relative YTD positioning (~28% gains), and reaffirmed high-end guidance amid load growth. While CMS and LNT provide stability and value, ETR's scale and hyperscale momentum suggest higher probabilistic outperformance, though balanced by execution risks.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2026
Stock price -- (CMS: $73.31ETR: $112.93LNT: $72.59)
Brand notoriety: CMS, ETR and LNT are all not notable
The three companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMS: 79%, ETR: 148%, LNT: 161%
Market capitalization -- CMS: $22.65B, ETR: $51.71B, LNT: $18.75B
$CMS is valued at $22.65B, while ETR has a market capitalization of $51.71B, and LNT's market capitalization is $18.75B. The market cap for tickers in this @Electric Utilities ranges from $197.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Electric Utilities industry is $25.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileETR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and LNT’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ETR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ETR and LNT are a better buy in the long-term than CMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ETR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and LNT’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • ETR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LNT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNT is a better buy in the short-term than ETR, which in turn is a better option than CMS.

Price Growth

CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.40% price change this week, while ETR (@Electric Utilities) price change was -3.77% , and LNT (@Electric Utilities) price fluctuated -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

ETR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

LNT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-1.15% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ETR($51.7B) has a higher market cap than CMS($22.6B) and LNT($18.7B). ETR has higher P/E ratio than LNT and CMS: ETR (28.81) vs LNT (22.83) and CMS (20.28). ETR YTD gains are higher at: 23.654 vs. LNT (13.410) and CMS (6.438). ETR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.24B vs. CMS (3.4B) and LNT (2.03B). ETR has more cash in the bank: 3.57B vs. CMS (175M) and LNT (115M). LNT has less debt than CMS and ETR: LNT (11.8B) vs CMS (19.1B) and ETR (34.1B). ETR has higher revenues than CMS and LNT: ETR (13.3B) vs CMS (8.82B) and LNT (4.42B).
CMSETRLNT
Capitalization22.6B51.7B18.7B
EBITDA3.4B6.24B2.03B
Gain YTD6.43823.65413.410
P/E Ratio20.2828.8122.83
Revenue8.82B13.3B4.42B
Total Cash175M3.57B115M
Total Debt19.1B34.1B11.8B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMS vs ETR vs LNT: Fundamental Ratings
CMS
ETR
LNT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
535975
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47229
SMR RATING
1..100
626665
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
594649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
523837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
857550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMS's Valuation (64) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as LNT (67) and is in the same range as ETR (76). This means that CMS's stock grew similarly to LNT’s and similarly to ETR’s over the last 12 months.

ETR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as LNT (29) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CMS (47). This means that ETR's stock grew similarly to LNT’s and somewhat faster than CMS’s over the last 12 months.

CMS's SMR Rating (62) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as LNT (65) and is in the same range as ETR (66). This means that CMS's stock grew similarly to LNT’s and similarly to ETR’s over the last 12 months.

ETR's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as LNT (49) and is in the same range as CMS (59). This means that ETR's stock grew similarly to LNT’s and similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.

LNT's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ETR (38) and is in the same range as CMS (52). This means that LNT's stock grew similarly to ETR’s and similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSETRLNT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ETR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYH61.391.16
+1.93%
iShares US Healthcare ETF
MYMF24.82N/A
N/A
State Street® My2026 Municipal Bond ETF
EUDG38.03-0.13
-0.33%
WisdomTree Europe Quality Div Gr ETF
JGH12.73-0.06
-0.47%
NUVEEN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND
EMKT30.24-0.94
-3.00%
Lazard Emerging Markets Opports ETF

ETR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ETR has been closely correlated with AEE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ETR jumps, then AEE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ETR
1D Price
Change %
ETR100%
-0.04%
AEE - ETR
73%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
DTE - ETR
71%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
OGE - ETR
68%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
AEP - ETR
67%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
LNT - ETR
67%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
More