These three exchange-traded funds (ETFs) compete within the cannabis and hemp thematic sector, each employing an active management strategy to capture growth from evolving legalization trends. While they share a common focus on companies deriving significant revenue from cannabis-related activities, they pursue different approaches: CNBS emphasizes diversified global exposure, MSOS concentrates on U.S. operators, and WEED offers concentrated U.S. multi-state operator (MSO) holdings. This comparison highlights how variations in holdings, expense ratios, and geographic tilts influence their suitability for investors seeking sector exposure amid shifting regulatory and macroeconomic conditions.
CNBS is an actively managed ETF that seeks capital appreciation by investing in companies across the global cannabis and hemp ecosystem, including plant operations, support services, and ancillary businesses. The fund typically holds 36-45 securities and may use total return swaps for exposure. Top holdings often include Curaleaf Holdings Inc (CURA), Green Thumb Industries Inc, and Trulieve Cannabis Corp, with allocations spanning cultivation, retail, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and related technologies. Sector allocation centers on cannabis-related equities with some treasury bill holdings for liquidity management. The net expense ratio stands at 0.76%. Distinguishing features include active oversight by portfolio managers and a mandate to allocate at least 80% of assets to firms generating 50% or more revenue from the cannabis ecosystem.
MSOS is an actively managed ETF focused exclusively on U.S. cannabis and hemp companies, primarily multi-state operators (MSOs). The fund invests at least 80% of net assets in securities or derivatives with similar economic characteristics, frequently employing total return swaps. Holdings center on domestic operators with limited international exposure. The expense ratio ranges from 0.78% to 0.97%. Key structural elements include active selection by the advisor and a non-diversified approach targeting mid- and small-capitalization U.S. firms. This design provides targeted access to the largest U.S. cannabis market without broader global diversification.
WEED is an actively managed ETF that seeks capital growth through concentrated exposure to leading U.S. cannabis companies and REITs. The fund maintains approximately seven holdings, emphasizing the largest multi-state operators (MSOs). Top positions typically include Curaleaf Holdings Inc, Trulieve Cannabis Corp, and Green Thumb Industries Inc. The gross expense ratio is 0.41%, making it the most cost-efficient of the group. The strategy requires at least 80% of assets in equity securities or swaps tied to firms deriving 50% or more revenue from the cannabis and hemp ecosystem. Its concentrated, non-diversified structure prioritizes precision over breadth within the U.S. market.
The cannabis sector operates in a dynamic environment shaped by state-level legalization expansions, potential federal regulatory shifts, and macroeconomic factors such as consumer spending patterns and interest rate trends. Capital flows into the space remain sensitive to policy developments, with U.S. multi-state operators (MSOs) benefiting from domestic market scale while facing banking and tax constraints. Earnings trends among major holdings reflect growth in recreational and medical sales, tempered by competition and compliance costs. Geopolitical influences are minimal, but sector risks include regulatory uncertainty, valuation volatility, and limited institutional participation due to federal scheduling status.
In recent market cycles, the three ETFs have exhibited varying degrees of volatility driven by their structural differences. CNBS's broader global holdings and moderate concentration have contributed to relatively balanced sensitivity to sector-wide movements. MSOS's U.S.-centric focus and swap usage have amplified exposure to domestic regulatory news and operator-specific developments. WEED's high concentration in a handful of large U.S. multi-state operators (MSOs) has led to sharper drawdowns during sector stress but potentially stronger upside in favorable conditions. Performance divergences arise primarily from holdings overlap, expense differentials, and geographic emphasis rather than short-term price fluctuations.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs like those compared here can leverage this platform for efficient opportunity discovery.
Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probability of favorable risk-adjusted positioning to Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED). Its lowest expense ratio, concentrated yet targeted U.S. multi-state operator (MSO) exposure, and streamlined holdings profile offer cost efficiency and focused thematic alignment relative to the broader or swap-heavy alternatives.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| CNBS | MSOS | WEED | |
| Gain YTD | 2.645 | 8.263 | 14.253 |
| Net Assets | 82.4M | 1B | 8.3M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.41 |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 0.00 | 23.00 |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | 4 years |
| CNBS | MSOS | WEED | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 88% | 28 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 85% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IBID | 25.83 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term Tips ETF | |||
| NFRA | 65.73 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| Northern Trust STOXX Glb Brd Infras ETF | |||
| RSSE | 23.86 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Eql Wght Buffr ETF - Sep | |||
| PAPI | 27.84 | -0.18 | -0.64% |
| Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF | |||
| PLYY | 8.15 | -0.09 | -1.13% |
| GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNBS has been loosely correlated with IIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNBS jumps, then IIPR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNBS | 100% | +1.93% | ||
| IIPR - CNBS | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| AFCG - CNBS | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
| IMCC - CNBS | 8% Poorly correlated | -10.00% | ||
| RVTY - CNBS | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| HYFM - CNBS | -0% Poorly correlated | -6.47% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSOS has been loosely correlated with GRWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSOS jumps, then GRWG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSOS | 100% | +3.23% | ||
| GRWG - MSOS | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.81% | ||
| HYFM - MSOS | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.47% | ||
| IIPR - MSOS | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
| RVTY - MSOS | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| RYM - MSOS | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.82% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that WEED and TPB have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WEED and TPB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WEED | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEED | 100% | +2.17% | ||
| TPB - WEED | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
| OGI - WEED | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.28% | ||
| CRON - WEED | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A |