COPX
Price
$90.66
Change
-$0.59 (-0.65%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
8.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MGNR
Price
$55.02
Change
-$0.29 (-0.52%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
1.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MXI
Price
$115.29
Change
-$0.66 (-0.57%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
409.13M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPX or MGNR or MXI

COPX vs MGNR vs MXI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) vs. American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) vs. iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI)

Key Takeaways

  • COPX offers concentrated thematic exposure to global copper mining companies through a passive index-tracking strategy, resulting in higher sector specificity but narrower diversification compared to the other two ETFs.
  • MGNR stands out as an actively managed fund with a broad natural resources mandate that includes metals, energy, agriculture, and chemicals, allowing for dynamic security selection and higher expense ratio of 0.75%.
  • MXI provides the broadest and most diversified passive exposure to the global materials sector, tracking a large-cap tilted index with the lowest expense ratio among the three at approximately 0.37%.
  • Structural differences in management style—passive thematic for COPX, active broad natural resources for MGNR, and passive broad materials for MXI—lead to varying levels of concentration risk and sensitivity to commodity price cycles.
  • Expense efficiency favors MXI for long-term holding, while COPX delivers targeted copper exposure and MGNR offers active management flexibility within the natural resources theme.
  • All three ETFs share exposure to materials and mining but differ significantly in geographic breadth, number of holdings, and rebalancing approaches, influencing their risk-adjusted positioning across market cycles.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to materials and natural resources currently have distinct choices in COPX, MGNR, and MXI. These exchange-traded funds do not track identical indexes but instead represent varied strategic approaches to the same overarching theme of commodity-related equities. COPX focuses narrowly on copper miners, MGNR employs active management across a wide natural resources universe, and MXI delivers broad passive coverage of the global materials sector. This comparison highlights how their structural differences affect diversification, costs, and positioning amid ongoing demand for metals and resources driven by electrification and infrastructure trends.

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Overview

The Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. The fund typically holds approximately 40 to 45 securities, with a focus on companies involved in copper exploration, mining, and production. Top holdings often include major producers such as BHP Group, Teck Resources, Hudbay Minerals, Southern Copper, and First Quantum Minerals. Sector allocation is heavily concentrated in basic materials, exceeding 95% in recent periods. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. As a non-diversified thematic fund, it employs market-capitalization weighting with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment with the underlying index, providing efficient single-trade access to the copper mining industry.

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) Overview

The American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in early 2024. It invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities of companies primarily engaged in natural resources and related businesses, encompassing metals, energy, agriculture, timber, water, and chemicals. The portfolio typically contains 36 to 51 holdings, with top positions including names such as Methanex, Range Resources, Antero Resources, EQT, and Darling Ingredients. Sector weights span basic materials, energy, and consumer defensive areas. The expense ratio is 0.75%. Active management allows flexible security selection and rebalancing based on fundamental opportunities rather than strict index rules, resulting in a concentrated, high-conviction approach to the broad natural resources theme.

iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) Overview

The iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that tracks the S&P Global 1200 Materials Sector Capped Index. It holds approximately 91 securities, emphasizing large-cap global companies in the materials sector, including chemicals, metals and mining, and containers and packaging. Representative top holdings include BHP, Linde, Newmont, Air Liquide, and Rio Tinto. Sector allocation centers on basic materials with some industrial exposure. The expense ratio is 0.37%. The fund uses a market-capitalization weighting methodology with quarterly rebalancing to reflect index changes, delivering diversified, cost-efficient exposure to the global materials industry through physical replication.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The materials and natural resources sectors operate within a macro environment shaped by global electrification, renewable energy expansion, and infrastructure development. Copper and other base metals face structural demand growth from electric vehicles and data centers, while broader materials companies contend with supply constraints, regulatory changes around mining permits, and geopolitical tensions affecting key producing regions. Capital flows into commodity-linked equities have increased in recent market cycles as investors seek inflation hedges and diversification from traditional equities. Earnings trends among major holdings reflect commodity price volatility, with energy transition themes supporting long-term positioning. Sector risks include cyclical downturns, environmental regulations, and currency fluctuations in international operations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months and market cycles, the three ETFs have exhibited differing behaviors tied to their structural profiles. COPX has shown higher volatility and stronger sensitivity to copper price movements due to its concentrated thematic focus. MGNR's active approach has allowed potential outperformance in select natural resources subsectors but introduces manager-specific risk and higher costs. MXI has delivered more stable, broad-based returns with lower drawdowns in diversified materials exposure, benefiting from its large-cap tilt and lower expense ratio. Relative positioning reflects concentration risk in COPX, active flexibility in MGNR, and broad diversification in MXI, influencing how each responds to macroeconomic drivers such as interest rates and commodity cycles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing ETFs like COPX, MGNR, and MXI can leverage this platform to refine their analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural strength, MXI presents the most favorable risk-adjusted profile for broad materials exposure due to its superior diversification across 91 holdings, lowest expense ratio, and passive index methodology that minimizes concentration risk. COPX offers compelling thematic precision for copper-specific views but carries higher volatility. MGNR provides active flexibility at a premium cost. Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probabilistic favorability to MXI for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and broad positioning within the materials sector.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 8.12B vs. MGNR (1.3B) and MXI (409M). COPX has a higher annual dividend yield than MGNR and MXI: COPX (26.714) vs MGNR (25.262) and MXI (20.511). COPX was incepted earlier than MGNR and MXI: COPX (16 years) vs MGNR (3 years) and MXI (20 years). MXI (0.37) has a lower expense ratio than COPX (0.65) and MGNR (0.75). MGNR has a higher turnover COPX (21.67) and MXI (11.00) vs COPX (21.67) and MXI (11.00).
COPXMGNRMXI
Gain YTD26.71425.26220.511
Net Assets8.12B1.3B409M
Total Expense Ratio0.650.750.37
Turnover21.6780.0011.00
Yield2.070.751.59
Fund Existence16 years3 years20 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPXMGNRMXI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGNR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MXI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APHTX28.500.16
+0.56%
Artisan Focus Fund Institutional
JSJIX16.050.03
+0.19%
JHancock Small Cap Dynamic Growth I
MSCIX10.660.01
+0.09%
Madison Small Cap I
RERFX65.140.06
+0.09%
American Funds EUPAC R-5
JDWNX136.81N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Research N

COPX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPX
1D Price
Change %
COPX100%
-0.65%
BHP - COPX
83%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
WDS - COPX
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
NEXA - COPX
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
TKO - COPX
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
MTAL - COPX
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGNR has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGNR jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGNR
1D Price
Change %
MGNR100%
-0.52%
PAAS - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
-2.40%
KGC - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
-2.28%
CDE - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
AU - MGNR
74%
Closely correlated
-2.33%
CX - MGNR
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
More

MXI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MXI has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MXI jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MXI
1D Price
Change %
MXI100%
-0.57%
RIO - MXI
83%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
BHP - MXI
83%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
WPM - MXI
82%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
NEM - MXI
79%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
AEM - MXI
78%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
More