CQQQ
Price
$51.11
Change
-$2.72 (-5.05%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
3.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EWH
Price
$21.82
Change
-$0.70 (-3.11%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
1.16B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EWT
Price
$98.08
Change
-$7.67 (-7.25%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
11.16B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQQQ or EWH or EWT

Header iconCQQQ vs EWH vs EWT Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs EWH vs EWTBanner chart's image
CQQQ vs EWH vs EWT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) vs. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) vs. iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT)

Key Takeaways

  • Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) delivers concentrated exposure to Chinese technology companies through a passive strategy tracking a specialized technology-capped index, featuring higher expense ratio of 0.65% and approximately 172 holdings.
  • iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) offers broad access to Hong Kong equities via the MSCI Hong Kong 25-50 Index with the lowest expense ratio among the trio at 0.50% and a focus on financial services and real estate sectors.
  • iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) provides targeted Taiwan market exposure dominated by information technology, tracking the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index with an expense ratio of 0.59% and roughly 90 holdings.
  • Structural differences include thematic technology tilt in CQQQ and EWT versus diversified single-country equity in EWH, influencing risk profiles and sector sensitivities.
  • Cost efficiency favors EWH, while diversification depth varies with CQQQ showing moderate concentration and EWT balancing semiconductor leadership with other sectors.
  • Relative positioning reflects distinct geographic and thematic approaches within Asian equity markets, with performance dynamics tied to regional economic cycles and technology supply chains.

Introduction

These three exchange-traded funds (ETFs) provide distinct avenues for investors seeking Asian equity exposure. Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) emphasizes China's technology sector, iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) tracks Hong Kong large- and mid-cap equities, and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) focuses on Taiwanese companies. They do not track similar indexes or compete directly in the same niche but represent different strategic approaches to regional themes, offering tiered risk exposures through specialized country and sector tilts suitable for diversified portfolios.

Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) Overview

Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. The fund holds approximately 172 securities with a focus on technology, communication services, and consumer cyclical sectors. Top holdings typically include companies such as Meituan, Tencent Holdings, and PDD Holdings, which together represent significant portfolio weight. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. As a smart beta-style thematic vehicle, it employs quarterly rebalancing and provides investors with targeted access to China's technology ecosystem without leverage or active management.

iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) Overview

iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) is a passively managed ETF designed to track the MSCI Hong Kong 25-50 Index, which measures the performance of large- and mid-capitalization Hong Kong equities. The fund typically contains around 34 to 56 holdings, with substantial allocations to financial services, insurance, real estate, and utilities. Major positions often feature AIA Group and Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing. The expense ratio is 0.50%. This single-country equity ETF uses a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing and serves as a straightforward vehicle for Hong Kong market exposure.

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) Overview

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) is a passively managed ETF that tracks the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index, capturing large- and mid-cap Taiwanese equities. It holds approximately 90 securities, with heavy weighting toward information technology, followed by financials and industrials. Top holdings commonly include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and other semiconductor-related firms. The expense ratio is 0.59%. The fund applies diversification caps inherent to the index and rebalances as needed to maintain alignment with the benchmark, delivering focused yet rules-based access to Taiwan's equity market.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The ETFs operate within interconnected Asian equity markets shaped by technology supply chains, regional trade dynamics, and macroeconomic factors. Hong Kong serves as a financial gateway, Taiwan anchors global semiconductor production, and China drives technology innovation amid evolving regulatory and geopolitical influences. Capital flows into the region respond to earnings trends in semiconductors and internet services, shifts in monetary policy, and cross-border investment sentiment. Sector risks include concentration in technology hardware for Taiwan-focused strategies and financial sector cyclicality for Hong Kong exposure, alongside broader considerations around trade policies and economic growth trajectories.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the three ETFs have exhibited differentiated behaviors driven by their underlying exposures. Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has shown sensitivity to China-specific technology policy developments and consumer demand patterns, often displaying higher volatility tied to thematic concentration. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) has reflected steadier movements aligned with financial and real estate cycles, benefiting from lower relative volatility in certain periods. iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has demonstrated resilience or drawdowns linked to global semiconductor demand and supply-chain dynamics. Performance differences stem from sector tilts and geographic focus, with EWH generally offering more balanced positioning across cycles compared to the technology-centric profiles of the other two.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to enhance your research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic preference to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) at present. Its lowest expense ratio supports cost efficiency, while the diversified single-country approach across financials and real estate offers a differentiated risk profile relative to the more concentrated technology exposures in the other two ETFs. This positioning may provide relatively stable momentum characteristics and balanced diversification within the group, though outcomes remain dependent on evolving market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 11.2B vs. CQQQ (3.22B) and EWH (1.16B). EWT has a higher annual dividend yield than EWH and CQQQ: EWT (54.384) vs EWH (2.682) and CQQQ (-1.712). CQQQ was incepted earlier than EWH and EWT: CQQQ (17 years) vs EWH (30 years) and EWT (26 years). EWH (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EWT (0.59) and CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ and EWT has a higher turnover EWH (10.00) vs EWH (10.00).
CQQQEWHEWT
Gain YTD-1.7122.68254.384
Net Assets3.22B1.16B11.2B
Total Expense Ratio0.650.500.59
Turnover37.0010.0036.00
Yield2.124.780.97
Fund Existence17 years30 years26 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQQQEWHEWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EWH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EWT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRCVX20.96N/A
N/A
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income A
ADJEX18.27N/A
N/A
Azzad Ethical
RIDCX27.43N/A
N/A
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R3
PMFPX26.10N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index R5
STLYX44.32N/A
N/A
SEI Tax-Managed Large Cap Y (SIMT)

CQQQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQQQ
1D Price
Change %
CQQQ100%
-5.05%
BILI - CQQQ
79%
Closely correlated
-3.08%
BIDU - CQQQ
75%
Closely correlated
-9.75%
GDS - CQQQ
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.13%
TME - CQQQ
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
KC - CQQQ
61%
Loosely correlated
-6.70%
More

EWH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWH has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWH jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWH
1D Price
Change %
EWH100%
-3.11%
FUTU - EWH
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.53%