Advertisement
MTR vs TEAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTR is a Hold and TEAM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MTR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MTR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TEAM’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 8 bearish.
Price Growth
MTR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.59% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.54%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
MTR is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (+3.86% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
@Packaged Software (+1.80% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| MTR | TEAM | MTR / TEAM | |
| Capitalization | 20.5M | 50.2B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 3.59M | -154.53M | -2% |
| Gain YTD | -13.650 | -17.208 | 79% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.58 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.13M | 3.89B | 0% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.61B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.27B | - |
MTR | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTR's Valuation (47) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
MTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TEAM (94) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MTR’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
MTR's SMR Rating (57) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (94) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MTR (84) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to MTR’s over the last 12 months.
MTR's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TEAM (16) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MTR’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
| MTR | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 66% |
Advertisement
MTR and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MTR and STR have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTR and STR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTR | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| STR - MTR | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.66% | ||
| VTLE - MTR | 28% Poorly correlated | +4.20% | ||
| TALO - MTR | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.97% | ||
| CKX - MTR | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.36% | ||
| CTRA - MTR | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
TEAM and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | -5.42% | ||
| HUBS - TEAM | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| CRM - TEAM | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| NOW - TEAM | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| COIN - TEAM | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| PCOR - TEAM | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.68% | ||
More | ||||