FAS
Price
$173.92
Change
+$5.18 (+3.07%)
Updated
Jul 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IFED
Price
$46.90
Change
-$7.88 (-14.38%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Net Assets
73.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QULL
Price
$80.22
Change
+$15.12 (+23.23%)
Updated
Jul 2, 11:51 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
40.87M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAS or IFED or QULL

FAS vs IFED vs QULL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 24, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) vs. ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) vs. ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL)

Key Takeaways

  • FAS delivers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the financial sector through a swap-based structure, resulting in higher volatility and expense ratio compared to the other two ETFs.
  • IFED employs a rules-based strategy that adjusts large-cap equity exposure according to Federal Reserve monetary policy signals and firm-specific metrics, functioning as an actively tilted smart-beta ETN with a lower expense ratio of 0.45%.
  • QULL provides 2x leveraged exposure to a quality-factor index, emphasizing companies with strong profitability, earnings stability, and low debt, offering a different risk profile from sector-specific or policy-driven approaches.
  • Structural differences include FAS as a leveraged mutual fund, while IFED and QULL are exchange-traded notes (ETNs) issued by UBS, introducing counterparty risk not present in FAS.
  • Expense ratios vary significantly: FAS at approximately 0.88%, IFED at 0.45%, and QULL near 0.95%, influencing long-term cost efficiency across different market environments.
  • Diversification depth differs, with FAS concentrated in financials, IFED spanning broad large-cap equities with dynamic weighting, and QULL focused on quality characteristics across sectors.

Introduction

These three ETFs represent distinct approaches to equity exposure in the current market environment. FAS targets leveraged performance in the financial sector, IFED incorporates Federal Reserve policy dynamics into large-cap selection, and QULL applies leverage to a quality-factor strategy. They do not track similar indexes but instead offer tiered risk exposures and thematic tilts that appeal to investors seeking amplified returns, policy-responsive positioning, or factor-based resilience. This comparison highlights how structural variations influence their suitability across different economic cycles.

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) Overview

The Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It achieves this through a combination of swaps and other derivatives rather than direct stock ownership, resulting in a leveraged structure designed for short-term trading horizons. The fund typically holds a modest number of securities supplemented by derivatives to replicate the target exposure. Sector allocation is concentrated entirely in financials, including banks, insurance, and capital markets firms. Its expense ratio stands at approximately 0.88%. As a leveraged ETF from Direxion, it resets daily and exhibits compounding effects that can lead to significant divergence from 3x index returns over longer periods.

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) Overview

The ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index Total Return, a composite designed to maximize exposure to large-cap U.S. equities best positioned to benefit from prevailing monetary policy conditions. The index applies a rules-based methodology combining Federal Reserve developments with twelve firm-specific metrics for selection and weighting. As an ETN issued by UBS, it carries issuer credit risk. Holdings reflect a dynamic large-cap universe with fundamental weighting rather than pure market-cap. The expense ratio is 0.45%. This structure positions IFED as a smart-beta product that adjusts based on macroeconomic signals rather than remaining strictly passive.

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) Overview

The ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN seeks to deliver two times the compounded quarterly performance of the MSCI USA Quality Index before fees and expenses. The underlying index selects companies based on quality characteristics such as high return on equity, stable earnings growth, and low financial leverage. Like IFED, QULL is structured as an ETN from UBS, exposing investors to counterparty risk. Holdings emphasize quality leaders across multiple sectors rather than a single industry. The expense ratio is approximately 0.95%. Its leveraged factor approach aims to amplify returns from fundamentally strong companies while resetting exposure periodically.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The broader equity market continues to navigate shifting Federal Reserve policy, interest rate trajectories, and sector rotation between growth and value styles. Financials face sensitivity to rate changes and regulatory developments, while quality factors have attracted flows seeking defensive characteristics amid economic uncertainty. Capital allocation patterns reflect investor preference for resilience in earnings and balance sheets. Macro drivers include inflation trends, employment data, and geopolitical developments that influence monetary decisions. These elements create an environment where policy-responsive, leveraged, and factor-based strategies each encounter distinct headwinds and tailwinds depending on the prevailing cycle.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, performance differences stem primarily from leverage levels, sector concentration, and factor or policy tilts. FAS exhibits elevated volatility due to its 3x financials exposure, leading to sharper drawdowns during sector-specific stress and amplified gains in favorable rate environments. IFED's dynamic weighting tied to Federal Reserve signals has shown varying responsiveness across easing and tightening phases, potentially offering smoother trend consistency than pure sector leverage. QULL's 2x quality focus tends to demonstrate lower relative volatility than sector-leveraged products while maintaining sensitivity to overall market momentum and earnings quality trends. Concentration risk is highest in FAS given its narrow focus, whereas IFED and QULL provide broader diversification that may moderate extreme outcomes over multiple quarters.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural strength, diversification profile, cost efficiency, momentum stability, and risk-adjusted positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to IFED. Its lower expense ratio, rules-based integration of monetary policy signals, and broad large-cap exposure provide a balanced combination of adaptability and efficiency relative to the higher-cost leveraged structures of FAS and QULL. This assessment reflects comparative characteristics rather than guaranteed outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAS has more net assets: 2.36B vs. IFED (73.1M) and QULL (40.9M). QULL has a higher annual dividend yield than IFED and FAS: QULL (14.572) vs IFED (1.181) and FAS (1.112). FAS was incepted earlier than IFED and QULL: FAS (18 years) vs IFED (5 years) and QULL (5 years).
FASIFEDQULL
Gain YTD1.1121.18114.572
Net Assets2.36B73.1M40.9M
Total Expense Ratio0.88N/AN/A
Turnover66.00N/AN/A
Yield9.500.000.00
Fund Existence18 years5 years5 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FASIFEDQULL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IFED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QULL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
T24.131.17
+5.10%
AT&T
YELP25.100.60
+2.45%
YELP
RYN21.580.27
+1.27%
Rayonier
FKWL2.34-0.02
-0.85%
Franklin Wireless Corp
TSSI9.70-0.77
-7.35%
TSS.Inc

FAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAS has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAS jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAS
1D Price
Change %
FAS100%
+2.50%
SF - FAS
79%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
BAC - FAS
79%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
COF - FAS
75%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
JPM - FAS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
AXP - FAS
75%
Closely correlated
-4.30%
More