FAS
Price
$168.74
Change
+$4.11 (+2.50%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Net Assets
2.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPXL
Price
$260.40
Change
+$0.35 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Net Assets
6.52B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSO
Price
$65.67
Change
+$0.06 (+0.09%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Net Assets
7.71B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAS or SPXL or SSO

FAS vs SPXL vs SSO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 24, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) vs. Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) vs. ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO)

Key Takeaways

  • FAS delivers 3x daily exposure to the Financial Select Sector Index, concentrating risk in financial stocks, while SPXL and SSO provide leveraged exposure to the broader S&P 500 Index.
  • SSO offers 2x daily leverage on the S&P 500, striking a balance between amplified returns and lower volatility compared with the 3x products SPXL and FAS.
  • All three ETFs use derivatives and daily rebalancing to achieve targets, leading to compounding effects over longer periods and potential tracking divergence from underlying indexes.
  • FAS exhibits the highest sector concentration and sensitivity to interest rates and banking regulations, whereas SPXL and SSO benefit from broad diversification across 500 large-cap holdings.
  • Expense ratios for these leveraged ETFs cluster near 0.9%, reflecting the higher costs of derivatives-based strategies relative to unleveraged equity funds.
  • Structural differences position SSO for investors seeking moderated leverage on broad market exposure, SPXL for aggressive broad-market amplification, and FAS for targeted financial-sector conviction.

Introduction

Investors comparing leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) often evaluate products that amplify daily index returns but differ in scope and risk. FAS, SPXL, and SSO all seek to deliver multiples of daily index performance through derivatives, yet they target distinct benchmarks. FAS focuses exclusively on the financial sector, while SPXL and SSO track the S&P 500 Index with different leverage ratios. This comparison highlights how sector-specific versus broad-market exposure, combined with 3x versus 2x amplification, creates varied risk-return profiles suitable for different market environments and investor objectives.

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) Overview

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to 300% of the daily performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. The fund typically holds a basket of financial stocks and uses swaps to achieve its leverage target. It maintains exposure to approximately 70-80 holdings, with top positions often including JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Wells Fargo (WFC), Goldman Sachs (GS), and Citigroup (C). Sector allocation is nearly 100% financials. The expense ratio stands at approximately 0.95%. As a daily-reset leveraged product, FAS requires active monitoring and is designed for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) Overview

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) aims to deliver 300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index before fees and expenses. It employs a combination of swaps, futures, and equity securities to achieve the target leverage across roughly 500 large-cap U.S. stocks. Top holdings mirror the S&P 500 leaders such as Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), NVIDIA (NVDA), Amazon (AMZN), and Meta Platforms (META). Sector allocation reflects the broad S&P 500 composition, with technology, financials, and healthcare typically prominent. The expense ratio is approximately 0.95%. Like other daily leveraged ETFs, SPXL resets exposure each trading day, making it sensitive to volatility and compounding effects over multiple periods.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to 200% of the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund uses swaps and other derivatives to provide 2x exposure across the same approximately 500 holdings as the underlying index. Top positions align with S&P 500 constituents, including Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), NVIDIA (NVDA), Amazon (AMZN), and Alphabet (GOOGL). Sector weights follow the broad market distribution. The expense ratio is approximately 0.89%. SSO’s lower leverage ratio relative to 3x products generally results in reduced daily volatility while still amplifying broad-market movements.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The broader equity market remains influenced by monetary policy shifts, corporate earnings growth in technology and financial services, and evolving regulatory frameworks for banks. Capital continues to flow toward large-cap growth names within the S&P 500, while financial institutions face ongoing scrutiny around capital requirements and interest-rate sensitivity. Macroeconomic drivers such as inflation trends and geopolitical developments can affect both broad-market indexes and the financial sector specifically. Regulatory changes and earnings momentum among major holdings continue to shape sector dynamics across leveraged and unleveraged products alike.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the 3x products FAS and SPXL have exhibited greater daily volatility and larger drawdowns during downturns compared with the 2x SSO. FAS’s financial-sector focus introduces additional sensitivity to banking-specific factors such as net interest margins and regulatory announcements, potentially amplifying or dampening returns relative to the broad-market leveraged ETFs. SPXL’s 3x broad exposure delivers higher amplification during sustained uptrends but magnifies losses in corrections. SSO’s 2x structure tends to provide more moderate swings while still capturing directional moves in the S&P 500. Differences arise primarily from leverage ratios and the concentration inherent in FAS versus the diversified holdings of SPXL and SSO.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Its 2x leverage on the diversified S&P 500 Index offers a favorable combination of amplification, cost efficiency relative to peers, and lower concentration risk compared with the sector-specific 3x exposure of Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). While Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) provides stronger upside in strong bull markets, the moderated risk profile of SSO supports more consistent positioning across varying market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 7.71B vs. SPXL (6.52B) and FAS (2.36B). SPXL has a higher annual dividend yield than SSO and FAS: SPXL (18.545) vs SSO (13.850) and FAS (1.112). FAS was incepted earlier than SPXL and SSO: FAS (18 years) vs SPXL (18 years) and SSO (20 years). SPXL (0.84), SSO (0.87) and FAS (0.88) have comparable expense ratios . SPXL has a higher turnover FAS (66.00) and SSO (4.00) vs FAS (66.00) and SSO (4.00).
FASSPXLSSO
Gain YTD1.11218.54513.850
Net Assets2.36B6.52B7.71B
Total Expense Ratio0.880.840.87
Turnover66.0071.004.00
Yield9.500.530.67
Fund Existence18 years18 years20 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FASSPXLSSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JUCY21.990.01
+0.05%
Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF
SPBO28.450.01
+0.04%
State Street® SPDR® Port Corp Bd ETF
BFJL17.37N/A
N/A
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July
HBTA30.83-0.54
-1.73%
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF
MEMX44.97-0.98
-2.13%
Matthews Emerging Markets Ex Chn Act ETF

SPXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPXL has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPXL jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXL
1D Price
Change %
SPXL100%
+0.13%
MSFT - SPXL
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
AAPL - SPXL
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.53%
AMZN - SPXL
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
META - SPXL
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
NVDA - SPXL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
More

SSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSO has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSO jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSO
1D Price
Change %
SSO100%
+0.09%
MSFT - SSO
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
AAPL - SSO
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.53%
AMZN - SSO
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
NVDA - SSO
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%