Advertisement
FIX or MTZ or PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Comfort Systems USA (FIX) vs. MasTec (MTZ) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Comfort Systems USA (FIX) leads with explosive YTD gains over 110%, driven by data center demand and Q1 revenue up 56% year-over-year (YoY).
- MasTec (MTZ) shows robust momentum with ~100% YTD returns, record Q1 revenue of $3.8B (up 34% YoY), and a $20.3B backlog.
- Quanta Services (PWR) delivers steady growth at ~83% YTD, with Q1 revenue of $7.9B (up 26% YoY) and a massive $48.5B backlog.
- All three benefit from infrastructure tailwinds like electrification and AI data centers, but FIX exhibits the strongest recent relative performance.
- Recent earnings beats across the board have fueled sentiment shifts, with backlogs signaling sustained demand.
- Comparative 1-year returns: FIX ~350%, MTZ ~200%, PWR ~140%.
Introduction
Comfort Systems USA (FIX), MasTec (MTZ), and Quanta Services (PWR) are key players in the infrastructure construction sector, specializing in mechanical, electrical, and energy projects amid surging demand for data centers, renewables, and grid upgrades. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business drivers, and market positioning, offering insights for traders eyeing momentum plays and investors focused on long-term infrastructure growth. With U.S. electrification and AI-driven power needs accelerating, these stocks highlight relative strengths in a high-growth environment.
FIX Overview and Recent Performance
Comfort Systems USA (FIX), headquartered in Houston, Texas, provides mechanical and electrical contracting services, including HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning), plumbing, piping, controls, and fire protection for commercial, industrial, and institutional clients. In recent market activity, FIX shares have surged over 110% year-to-date (YTD), outperforming broader indices, with 1-year returns exceeding 350%. This momentum stems from strong Q1 results, where revenue jumped 56.5% YoY to $2.87 billion, beating estimates, and EPS reached $10.51, far above expectations, fueled by data center builds. A record backlog and positive analyst sentiment have bolstered performance, though high valuations reflect elevated growth expectations.
MTZ Overview and Recent Performance
MasTec (MTZ), based in Coral Gables, Florida, is an infrastructure engineering and construction firm operating in communications, clean energy, power delivery, and pipeline segments. Recent weeks have seen MTZ deliver approximately 100% YTD gains and over 200% in the past year, driven by robust demand. Q1 revenue hit a record $3.83 billion, up 34% YoY and surpassing forecasts, with adjusted EPS of $1.39 topping estimates by 40%. An 18-month backlog reached $20.3 billion, up 28% YoY, signaling strong visibility, particularly in clean energy and communications, enhancing investor confidence.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services (PWR), also Houston-based, delivers infrastructure solutions for electric power, pipeline, renewables, and communications, serving utilities and energy firms. PWR has advanced about 83% YTD and 140% over the past year, supported by sector tailwinds. Q1 revenue grew 26% YoY to $7.9 billion, exceeding expectations, with adjusted EPS of $2.68 beating consensus. A record $48.5 billion backlog underscores multi-year demand from grid modernization and data centers, contributing to stable sentiment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. These bots leverage advanced financial learning models for pattern recognition, achieving annualized returns up to 279%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors exceeding 3.0 in sectors like tech, energy, and industrials. For instance, top agents have delivered 127% average returns, with standouts like 192% in aerospace and 236% in leveraged ETFs. Only the most suitable for current conditions—based on backtested performance, low drawdowns, and market adaptability—earn a spot here. Explore these bots to align with your risk profile and enhance trading efficiency.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models overlap in infrastructure but diverge: FIX focuses on mechanical/electrical for buildings and data centers; MTZ emphasizes communications, clean energy, and pipelines; PWR leads in broad electric power and renewables with greater scale ($114B market cap vs. $69B for FIX, $33B for MTZ). Growth drivers include AI data centers and grid upgrades, with all reporting record backlogs—PWR's $48.5B dwarfs others. Recent momentum favors FIX (42% monthly gain) over MTZ (35%) and PWR. Risks involve project delays and labor shortages, heightened for smaller peers; PWR offers diversification. Valuation sensitivity is elevated across the board (P/E ratios 50-100+), with sector exposure tilting FIX toward data centers. Market sentiment reflects earnings beats, positioning all for upside amid infrastructure spending.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors FIX among the trio, owing to superior trend consistency, explosive recent momentum (110%+ YTD, 350% 1-year), and data center catalysts amid relative stability. While MTZ shows agile backlog growth and PWR provides scale, FIX's outperformance suggests higher near-term probability in bullish infrastructure conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and PWR’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- FIX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and PWR’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FIX (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +2.11% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.15% , and PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated +3.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIX is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-2.94% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| FIX | MTZ | PWR | |
| Capitalization | 70.1B | 32.8B | 116B |
| EBITDA | 1.72B | 1.22B | 2.71B |
| Gain YTD | 113.712 | 90.873 | 82.520 |
| P/E Ratio | 57.53 | 72.66 | 105.62 |
| Revenue | 10.1B | 15.3B | 30.1B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 274M | 365M |
| Total Debt | 339M | 3.02B | 6.32B |
FIX | MTZ | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 83 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 5 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 58 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 36 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 25 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FIX's Valuation (87) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (91) and is in the same range as PWR (93). This means that FIX's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
FIX's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (3) and is in the same range as MTZ (5). This means that FIX's stock grew similarly to PWR’s and similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
FIX's SMR Rating (19) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (58) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (60). This means that FIX's stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s and somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FIX (35) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (36). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to FIX’s and somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
FIX's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (10) and is in the same range as MTZ (25). This means that FIX's stock grew similarly to PWR’s and similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| FIX | MTZ | PWR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 65% | 10 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CBXL | 20.74 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos Ladrd Bitcoin 90 Str Alt Prt ETF | |||
| ABCS | 31.46 | -0.31 | -0.98% |
| Alpha Blue Capital US Sm-Md Cp Dyn ETF | |||
| IZRL | 30.16 | -0.37 | -1.21% |
| ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF | |||
| OEF | 369.36 | -4.55 | -1.22% |
| iShares S&P 100 ETF | |||
| BBSC | 83.17 | -1.60 | -1.89% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF | |||
FIX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIX has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FIX jumps, then EME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIX | 100% | -2.39% | ||
| EME - FIX | 79% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| PWR - FIX | 75% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| MTZ - FIX | 74% Closely correlated | -4.57% | ||
| IESC - FIX | 73% Closely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| MYRG - FIX | 68% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | -4.57% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| MYRG - MTZ | 74% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 73% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| DY - MTZ | 68% Closely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| IESC - MTZ | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | -1.29% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | -4.57% | ||
| MYRG - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| FIX - PWR | 76% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| IESC - PWR | 67% Closely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| EME - PWR | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||