Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX or FSPGX or VTSAX
FNCMX vs FSPGX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs FSPGX vs VTSAX
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$270.90
Change-$2.22 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.92B
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Idx
Price$43.25
Change-$0.35 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.83B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$153.84
Change-$0.99 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
FNCMX vs FSPGX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. FSPGX (39.8B) and FNCMX (20.9B). VTSAX pays higher dividends than FNCMX and FSPGX: VTSAX (1.16) vs FNCMX (0.54) and FSPGX (0.33). FNCMX was incepted earlier than FSPGX and VTSAX: FNCMX (22 years) vs FSPGX (9 years) and VTSAX (25 years). FNCMX (0.30) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04) and FSPGX (0.04). FSPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FNCMX (2.00) and VTSAX (2.00). FNCMX and FSPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: FNCMX (0) and FSPGX (0) vs VTSAX (3000). FSPGX and FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.54 and 21.86 vs. VTSAX (14.36). FSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 103.73 vs. FNCMX (95.08) and VTSAX (82.55).
| FNCMX | FSPGX | VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | 25 years |
| Gain YTD | 11.582 | 11.310 | 9.836 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 3000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 20.9B | 39.8B | 1.91T |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.33 | 1.16 |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.86 | 22.54 | 14.36 |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.26 | 97.60 | 62.17 |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.08 | 103.73 | 82.55 |
| Returns for 10 years | 355.58 | N/A | 231.39 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement