FTXO
Price
$41.61
Change
-$0.20 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
307.21M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IXG
Price
$123.97
Change
+$0.03 (+0.02%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
588.49M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLF
Price
$53.57
Change
+$0.12 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
50.57B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTXO or IXG or XLF

FTXO vs IXG vs XLF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) vs. iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) vs. Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF)

Key Takeaways

  • FTXO offers targeted exposure to ~50 U.S. banks via a smart beta index emphasizing liquidity, volatility, value, and growth factors, with a higher expense ratio of 0.60%.
  • IXG provides broad global financials coverage across 219 holdings, blending U.S. and international firms at a 0.41% expense ratio, adding geographic diversification.
  • XLF delivers low-cost (0.08% expense ratio) passive access to 76 large-cap U.S. financial stocks from the S&P 500, prioritizing mega-caps like Berkshire Hathaway.
  • FTXO exhibits higher concentration risk (top 10 ~58%) focused solely on banks, contrasting XLF's diversified financial services tilt and IXG's international balance.
  • All three emphasize financial services (nearly 100% allocation), but FTXO limits to banks, heightening sensitivity to banking cycles versus broader sector buffers in XLF and IXG.
  • XLF stands out for cost efficiency and liquidity, ideal for core U.S. financials exposure, while FTXO suits tactical bank bets and IXG global plays.

Introduction

Investors navigating the financial sector face choices between targeted U.S. banking exposure, broad domestic large-cap coverage, and global diversification. FTXO, IXG, and XLF represent distinct strategic approaches within financials: FTXO hones in on U.S. banks using a smart beta methodology (a rules-based indexing incorporating factors beyond market cap), IXG spans international financial equities for worldwide sector access, and XLF tracks S&P 500 financial giants for efficient, low-cost U.S. benchmark replication. These ETFs compete in a sector influenced by interest rates, regulatory changes, and economic cycles, offering tiered risk profiles from concentrated banking (FTXO) to diversified global (IXG) and mega-cap U.S. (XLF). Comparing them aids portfolio positioning amid volatile monetary environments and capital flow shifts.

First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) Overview

The First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) is a passively managed smart beta fund tracking the Nasdaq US Smart Banks Index, selecting the most liquid U.S. banking companies and weighting them by volatility, value, and growth factors. It holds approximately 50 stocks, with top holdings including C (Citigroup ~8.7%), BAC (Bank of America ~8.0%), TFC (Truist ~7.8%), JPM (JPMorgan Chase ~7.8%), and WFC (Wells Fargo ~7.6%), comprising ~58% of assets. Sector allocation is 100% financial services, purely U.S. banks. The expense ratio is 0.60%. Launched in 2016, FTXO features quarterly rebalancing to maintain factor tilts, distinguishing it as a non-market-cap approach for banking purity and potential alpha from factor premiums.

iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) Overview

The iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) passively tracks the S&P Global 1200 Financials (Sector) Capped Index, offering exposure to global financial equities. It maintains 219 holdings, with top positions like BRK.B (Berkshire Hathaway ~6.0%), JPM (~5.6%), V (Visa ~3.7%), MA (Mastercard ~2.8%), and BAC (~2.4%), totaling ~30%. Sector breakdown: banks ~46%, financial services ~37%, insurance ~17%. The expense ratio is 0.41%. Inception in 2001, it caps individual holdings for diversification, blending U.S. (~70%) with developed and emerging international markets for broader risk dispersion versus U.S.-only peers.

Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) Overview

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) passively replicates the Financial Select Sector Index, a subset of S&P 500 financial companies. It includes 76 holdings, led by BRK.B (~12.0%), JPM (~11.1%), V (~7.4%), MA (~5.5%), and BAC (~4.6%), accounting for ~56%. Allocations: financial services ~28%, banks ~27%, capital markets ~27%, insurance ~13%, consumer finance ~4%. Expense ratio: 0.08%. Dating to 1998, XLF uses market-cap weighting with quarterly rebalancing, emphasizing liquidity and mega-cap dominance for benchmark-like U.S. financials exposure.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The financial sector grapples with interest rate trajectories, regulatory scrutiny on capital requirements (like CET1, or Common Equity Tier 1 ratios measuring bank resilience), and geopolitical tensions impacting cross-border lending. Capital flows favor resilient mega-banks amid M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity and NII (net interest income) growth from wider spreads, though NCOs (net charge-offs, or loan losses) rise in downturns. Macro drivers include inflation moderation boosting ROTCE (return on tangible common equity, a profitability gauge) and housing market strains on mortgage REITs. Sector risks encompass credit cycles, policy shifts like Basel III, and cyber threats, with banks most vulnerable to recessions versus diversified insurers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, XLF has shown trend consistency tied to S&P 500 mega-caps, exhibiting lower relative volatility due to its scale and diversification across financial sub-industries. FTXO, with its bank concentration, displays higher drawdowns during regional banking stresses but captures upswings in liquidity-favored names. IXG lags in U.S.-bullish cycles from international drags yet offers stability via global dispersion. Differences stem from FTXO's factor tilts amplifying bank beta, XLF's cap-weighting muting extremes, and IXG's currency/geopolitical sensitivities. Concentration risks peak in FTXO (top 10 ~58%), moderate in XLF (~56%), and dilute in IXG (~30%). All correlate to rates but vary in macro sensitivity: FTXO to U.S. lending, IXG to FX, XLF to broad equity flows.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (total value of outstanding shares), technical indicators like RSI (Relative Strength Index, measuring momentum), price patterns, and performance metrics. It identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes including sector ETFs like financials.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors XLF currently, given its superior cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), extensive liquidity, and balanced diversification across 76 S&P 500 financial leaders, promoting stable risk-adjusted positioning and momentum in U.S.-centric cycles. FTXO's smart beta bank focus adds alpha potential probabilistically (~60% edge in rising rate environments), but higher fees and concentration elevate volatility; IXG's global breadth (~40% suitability) hedges U.S. risks yet introduces currency drag. Structural edge tilts to XLF for most horizons.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLF has more net assets: 50.6B vs. IXG (588M) and FTXO (307M). FTXO has a higher annual dividend yield than IXG and XLF: FTXO (11.026) vs IXG (4.097) and XLF (-1.343). FTXO was incepted earlier than IXG and XLF: FTXO (10 years) vs IXG (25 years) and XLF (28 years). XLF (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IXG (0.41) and FTXO (0.60). FTXO has a higher turnover IXG (7.00) and XLF (6.00) vs IXG (7.00) and XLF (6.00).
FTXOIXGXLF
Gain YTD11.0264.097-1.343
Net Assets307M588M50.6B
Total Expense Ratio0.600.410.08
Turnover24.007.006.00
Yield1.772.021.54
Fund Existence10 years25 years28 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTXOIXGXLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTXO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IXG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIDVX15.730.12
+0.79%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val A
RGBCX41.900.05
+0.12%
American Funds Global Balanced R3
TMCIX15.54N/A
N/A
RBC SMID Cap Growth I
MLNIX27.61N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Instl Glbl Concntr I
LVOOX22.56N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities F3

FTXO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTXO has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTXO jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTXO
1D Price
Change %
FTXO100%
-0.48%
CFG - FTXO
92%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
FNB - FTXO
91%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
ZION - FTXO
90%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
USB - FTXO
89%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
RF - FTXO
89%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
More

IXG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXG has been closely correlated with JPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXG jumps, then JPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IXG
1D Price
Change %
IXG100%
+0.02%
JPM - IXG
73%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
C - IXG
73%
Closely correlated
-2.22%
GS - IXG
72%
Closely correlated
-4.27%
BAC - IXG
71%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
USB - IXG
71%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
More

XLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLF has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLF jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLF
1D Price
Change %
XLF100%
+0.22%
BAC - XLF
79%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
JPM - XLF
78%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
COF - XLF
78%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
AXP - XLF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
C - XLF
75%
Closely correlated
-2.22%
More