GLD
Price
$406.77
Change
-$3.45 (-0.84%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
149.29B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IAU
Price
$83.39
Change
-$0.71 (-0.84%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
65.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLV
Price
$59.82
Change
-$0.73 (-1.21%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
32.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLD or IAU or SLV

GLD vs IAU vs SLV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) vs. iShares Gold Trust (IAU) vs. iShares Silver Trust (SLV)

Key Takeaways

  • GLD, IAU, and SLV are all physically backed grantor trusts that provide direct exposure to precious metals prices without futures contracts or leverage.
  • IAU offers the lowest expense ratio at 0.25%, followed by GLD at 0.40% and SLV at 0.50%, creating meaningful long-term cost differences for buy-and-hold investors.
  • GLD and IAU deliver nearly identical gold price exposure while SLV provides silver exposure, resulting in distinct volatility and macroeconomic sensitivity profiles.
  • All three ETFs hold a single asset (physical bullion) and maintain 100% allocation to their respective metal with no sector diversification or active management.
  • Structural differences center on expense efficiency and metal type rather than index methodology or rebalancing, as each trust simply stores bullion and adjusts share creation or redemption accordingly.
  • Relative positioning favors lower-cost gold exposure (IAU) for broad precious metals allocation, while SLV introduces higher volatility tied to industrial demand for silver.

Introduction

Investors seeking precious metals exposure often compare GLD, IAU, and SLV because these exchange-traded products compete within the same commodity category yet differ in cost structure and underlying metal. GLD and IAU both track the price of gold bullion, while SLV tracks silver, allowing investors to evaluate tiered risk exposures within the precious metals theme. These ETFs represent straightforward, passive vehicles that hold physical bullion rather than derivatives, making them relevant for portfolio diversification during periods of inflation concerns, currency fluctuations, or geopolitical uncertainty. The comparison highlights structural efficiency, expense differentials, and the distinct demand drivers separating gold from silver.

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) Overview

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is a grantor trust sponsored by World Gold Trust Services, LLC that seeks to reflect the performance of the price of gold bullion, less expenses. The trust holds physical gold bars stored in secure vaults and issues or redeems shares in exchange for gold deposits or withdrawals. It tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM benchmark and maintains a single holding of gold bullion with no additional securities. The gross expense ratio stands at 0.40%. Distinguishing features include its status as one of the earliest U.S.-listed physically backed gold products and high trading volume that supports liquidity for institutional and retail investors alike.

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) Overview

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) is a grantor trust sponsored by iShares Delaware Trust Sponsor LLC that seeks to reflect generally the performance of the price of gold bullion, less expenses. The trust holds physical gold bars in allocated storage and adjusts share supply through creation and redemption baskets. It tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM benchmark and consists of one primary holding: physical gold. The expense ratio is 0.25%. Key characteristics include its lower cost structure relative to peers and straightforward design focused solely on gold price exposure without leverage or active strategies.

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) Overview

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) is a grantor trust sponsored by iShares Delaware Trust Sponsor LLC that seeks to reflect generally the performance of the price of silver bullion, less expenses. The trust holds physical silver bars in secure custody and manages share supply via authorized participant creation and redemption. It tracks the LBMA Silver Price benchmark and maintains a single holding of silver bullion. The expense ratio is 0.50%. Distinguishing features include its focus on silver, which carries both monetary and industrial demand characteristics, and its physically backed structure without derivatives or rebalancing beyond metal storage adjustments.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The precious metals sector responds primarily to macroeconomic drivers such as real interest rates, U.S. dollar movements, inflation expectations, and central bank purchasing activity. Gold benefits from safe-haven demand during equity market stress or geopolitical tensions, while silver experiences additional influence from industrial applications in electronics, solar energy, and automotive manufacturing. Capital flows into physically backed products have remained steady in recent market cycles as investors seek portfolio hedges. Regulatory oversight for these grantor trusts emphasizes custody standards and transparency of bullion holdings, with no material shifts in recent periods. Sector risks include storage costs, potential changes in tax treatment of collectibles, and fluctuations in mining supply that can affect price discovery for both metals.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months and market cycles, GLD and IAU have exhibited closely aligned price behavior driven by gold spot movements, with minor divergences attributable to expense ratios and minor tracking differences. SLV has shown greater volatility, reflecting silver's dual exposure to investment and industrial demand factors. Drawdowns in precious metals products have generally been shallower than equity markets during risk-off periods, yet silver has experienced wider swings tied to economic growth sentiment. Concentration risk remains uniform across all three as single-asset vehicles, while momentum stability favors the lower-cost gold trusts during prolonged uptrends in bullion prices. Structural differences in expense ratios and metal type explain most observed performance variations rather than differences in rebalancing or active management.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor iShares Gold Trust (IAU) on the basis of its lowest expense ratio among the three, combined with identical gold exposure to GLD and superior cost efficiency over SLV. The structural profile supports better risk-adjusted positioning for long-term precious metals allocation, particularly in environments where holding costs compound over extended periods. Probabilistic assessment indicates IAU offers the strongest combination of diversification depth within gold and overall expense competitiveness, while GLD provides comparable exposure at a modest premium and SLV introduces higher volatility through its silver mandate.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLD has more net assets: 149B vs. IAU (65.4B) and SLV (33B). IAU and GLD has a higher annual dividend yield than SLV: IAU (2.735) and GLD (2.639) vs SLV (-7.141). GLD was incepted earlier than IAU and SLV: GLD (22 years) vs IAU (22 years) and SLV (20 years). IAU (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than GLD (0.40) and SLV (0.50).
GLDIAUSLV
Gain YTD2.6392.735-7.141
Net Assets149B65.4B33B
Total Expense Ratio0.400.250.50
TurnoverN/AN/AN/A
Yield0.000.000.00
Fund Existence22 years22 years20 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLDIAUSLV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IAU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIDG8.040.59
+7.88%
Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF
ZJUN27.740.01
+0.04%
Innovator Equity Dfnd Prot ETF -1 YrJune
REET27.40-0.13
-0.47%
iShares Global REIT ETF
SFYF63.74-0.54
-0.84%
SoFi Social 50 ETF
SPYU35.35-0.59
-1.64%
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN